User login
The Rash That Outlasts
A 63-year-old man says the 20-year-old rash on his face first appeared one summer. Although it slackens a bit each winter, it flares up again when the weather warms—despite a bevy of OTC and prescription topical treatments.
The patient has consulted many providers, including several dermatologists, who have diagnosed the butterfly rash of lupus. But blood tests failed to bear out that theory, and no one has ever biopsied it.
The patient spent many years working in the sun with minimal to no protection. He denies fever, malaise, joint pain, or other illness. He denies having a similar rash elsewhere on his body.
EXAMINATION
A symmetrical, strikingly red, extensive rash covers most of both sides of the patient’s face. There is epidermal scaling and roughness and large areas of obvious follicular enlargement, atrophy, and telangiectasias.
Punch biopsy shows a multitude of changes: atrophic epithelium, basal vacuolar changes, an intense dermal lymphocytic infiltrate, liquefaction degeneration, and apoptotic keratinocytes. Compact orthokeratosis is noted on the surface, and increased mucin formation in the dermis.
What is the diagnosis?
DISCUSSION
These skin changes, in conjunction with the biopsy findings, are consistent with a diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). The vast majority of affected patients do not have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although nearly 17% eventually progress to it. This patient’s seronegative status had puzzled his previous providers—a common mistake that frequently delays diagnosis and treatment.
DLE is the most common type of chronic cutaneous lupus, occurring in about 17 to 48 of every 100,000 people in the general population. It affects far more women than men, mostly those ages 20 to 40. More blacks than whites are affected by DLE, which is thought to be a polygenic autoimmune disease linked to various human leukocyte antigen groups.
DLE affects sun-exposed areas, including the scalp (where it often goes undiagnosed, leading to scarring alopecia). It can also occur in the mouth, manifesting as annular eroded areas. In this patient’s case, the combination of UV exposure and apparent genetic predisposition caused his malady.
Following workup to rule out systemic disease, the patient was started on hydroxychloroquine HCL (200 mg bid) and given strict instructions to protect himself from the sun. This should yield considerable improvement, although the scarring on large sections of his face (eg, the posterior cheeks) will be permanent. He will also be monitored for possible progression to SLE.
TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS
- Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a form of chronic cutaneous lupus caused by overexposure to the sun in a genetically susceptible individual.
- Most DLE patients never develop systemic lupus, though it’s far from unknown (17%).
- DLE, an autoimmune disease, is far more common in women (ages 20 – 40) than in men.
- Diagnosis is often made clinically, but biopsy reveals characteristic findings that confirm the disease.
- Besides sun protection, DLE is treated with the oral antimalarial hydroxychloroquine HCL (200 mg bid) and topical steroids as needed.
A 63-year-old man says the 20-year-old rash on his face first appeared one summer. Although it slackens a bit each winter, it flares up again when the weather warms—despite a bevy of OTC and prescription topical treatments.
The patient has consulted many providers, including several dermatologists, who have diagnosed the butterfly rash of lupus. But blood tests failed to bear out that theory, and no one has ever biopsied it.
The patient spent many years working in the sun with minimal to no protection. He denies fever, malaise, joint pain, or other illness. He denies having a similar rash elsewhere on his body.
EXAMINATION
A symmetrical, strikingly red, extensive rash covers most of both sides of the patient’s face. There is epidermal scaling and roughness and large areas of obvious follicular enlargement, atrophy, and telangiectasias.
Punch biopsy shows a multitude of changes: atrophic epithelium, basal vacuolar changes, an intense dermal lymphocytic infiltrate, liquefaction degeneration, and apoptotic keratinocytes. Compact orthokeratosis is noted on the surface, and increased mucin formation in the dermis.
What is the diagnosis?
DISCUSSION
These skin changes, in conjunction with the biopsy findings, are consistent with a diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). The vast majority of affected patients do not have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although nearly 17% eventually progress to it. This patient’s seronegative status had puzzled his previous providers—a common mistake that frequently delays diagnosis and treatment.
DLE is the most common type of chronic cutaneous lupus, occurring in about 17 to 48 of every 100,000 people in the general population. It affects far more women than men, mostly those ages 20 to 40. More blacks than whites are affected by DLE, which is thought to be a polygenic autoimmune disease linked to various human leukocyte antigen groups.
DLE affects sun-exposed areas, including the scalp (where it often goes undiagnosed, leading to scarring alopecia). It can also occur in the mouth, manifesting as annular eroded areas. In this patient’s case, the combination of UV exposure and apparent genetic predisposition caused his malady.
Following workup to rule out systemic disease, the patient was started on hydroxychloroquine HCL (200 mg bid) and given strict instructions to protect himself from the sun. This should yield considerable improvement, although the scarring on large sections of his face (eg, the posterior cheeks) will be permanent. He will also be monitored for possible progression to SLE.
TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS
- Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a form of chronic cutaneous lupus caused by overexposure to the sun in a genetically susceptible individual.
- Most DLE patients never develop systemic lupus, though it’s far from unknown (17%).
- DLE, an autoimmune disease, is far more common in women (ages 20 – 40) than in men.
- Diagnosis is often made clinically, but biopsy reveals characteristic findings that confirm the disease.
- Besides sun protection, DLE is treated with the oral antimalarial hydroxychloroquine HCL (200 mg bid) and topical steroids as needed.
A 63-year-old man says the 20-year-old rash on his face first appeared one summer. Although it slackens a bit each winter, it flares up again when the weather warms—despite a bevy of OTC and prescription topical treatments.
The patient has consulted many providers, including several dermatologists, who have diagnosed the butterfly rash of lupus. But blood tests failed to bear out that theory, and no one has ever biopsied it.
The patient spent many years working in the sun with minimal to no protection. He denies fever, malaise, joint pain, or other illness. He denies having a similar rash elsewhere on his body.
EXAMINATION
A symmetrical, strikingly red, extensive rash covers most of both sides of the patient’s face. There is epidermal scaling and roughness and large areas of obvious follicular enlargement, atrophy, and telangiectasias.
Punch biopsy shows a multitude of changes: atrophic epithelium, basal vacuolar changes, an intense dermal lymphocytic infiltrate, liquefaction degeneration, and apoptotic keratinocytes. Compact orthokeratosis is noted on the surface, and increased mucin formation in the dermis.
What is the diagnosis?
DISCUSSION
These skin changes, in conjunction with the biopsy findings, are consistent with a diagnosis of discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). The vast majority of affected patients do not have systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although nearly 17% eventually progress to it. This patient’s seronegative status had puzzled his previous providers—a common mistake that frequently delays diagnosis and treatment.
DLE is the most common type of chronic cutaneous lupus, occurring in about 17 to 48 of every 100,000 people in the general population. It affects far more women than men, mostly those ages 20 to 40. More blacks than whites are affected by DLE, which is thought to be a polygenic autoimmune disease linked to various human leukocyte antigen groups.
DLE affects sun-exposed areas, including the scalp (where it often goes undiagnosed, leading to scarring alopecia). It can also occur in the mouth, manifesting as annular eroded areas. In this patient’s case, the combination of UV exposure and apparent genetic predisposition caused his malady.
Following workup to rule out systemic disease, the patient was started on hydroxychloroquine HCL (200 mg bid) and given strict instructions to protect himself from the sun. This should yield considerable improvement, although the scarring on large sections of his face (eg, the posterior cheeks) will be permanent. He will also be monitored for possible progression to SLE.
TAKE-HOME LEARNING POINTS
- Discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) is a form of chronic cutaneous lupus caused by overexposure to the sun in a genetically susceptible individual.
- Most DLE patients never develop systemic lupus, though it’s far from unknown (17%).
- DLE, an autoimmune disease, is far more common in women (ages 20 – 40) than in men.
- Diagnosis is often made clinically, but biopsy reveals characteristic findings that confirm the disease.
- Besides sun protection, DLE is treated with the oral antimalarial hydroxychloroquine HCL (200 mg bid) and topical steroids as needed.
Blinatumomab triggers complete MRD response in ALL
After treatment with blinatumomab, most patients with minimal residual disease–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) achieved complete MRD response, according to results of a single-arm phase 2 study.
Achieving complete MRD response was associated with significantly longer relapse-free and overall survival in the patients, who were already in hematologic complete remission, researchers reported in the journal Blood.
“Our results suggest that targeted treatment in early stages of MRD is a viable therapeutic strategy for patients with B-cell precursor ALL and that it should also be evaluated in other hematologic malignancies,” Nicola Gökbuget, MD, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany, and her coauthors wrote.
This is the first international multicenter study to specifically enroll MRD-positive ALL patients and evaluate them for an MRD-based primary outcome in a cohort of MRD-positive ALL patients, according to the authors.
Preemptively treating low but measurable disease in ALL in remission, instead of waiting for overt relapse, is a strategy that may prolong overall survival, Dr. Gökbuget and her colleagues said in describing the rationale for their study. While there is no standard therapy yet for ALL patients with detectable MRD after intensive chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended, based on data that it may improve outcomes in patients with persistent MRD. However, other studies suggest detectable MRD before HSCT is associated with higher relapse rates, and many patients relapse while waiting for HSCT, the researchers noted.
To test an MRD-directed treatment strategy, Dr. Gökbuget and colleagues at 46 centers in Europe and Russia conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study including 116 patients with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission. Patients in the study received up to four cycles of blinatumomab, a bispecific, T cell–engager antibody construct that enables T cells to recognize and eliminate CD19-positive cells.
Of 113 evaluable patients, 88 (78%) achieved complete MRD response after one cycle, the primary end point of the study. Relapse-free survival at 18 months was estimated at 54% and median overall survival was 36.5 months in the subset of 110 patients with Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL in hematologic remission.
Complete MRD responders had improved relapse-free survival versus MRD nonresponders (23.6 vs. 5.7 months; P = .002), they reported. Likewise, overall survival was improved for MRD responders (38.9 vs. 12.5 months; P = .002).
Adverse events were consistent with what was previously reported for blinatumomab and included grade 3 and 4 neurologic events in 12 patients (10%) and 3 patients (3%), respectively. Cytokine-release syndrome was seen in four patients, with grade 1 and grade 3 cases.
The study was not designed to assess the impact of HSCT, which most patients (n = 76) underwent. However, a number of patients with complete MRD response but no HSCT remained in long-term remission, confirming results of an earlier blinatumomab pilot study, according to the researchers.
“This observation might be of relevance for the development of future treatment strategies, particularly for less fit and elderly patients,” Dr. Gökbuget and her coauthors wrote.
Additional studies are needed to clarify the role and indications for HSCT in this setting, they added.
The study was designed by Amgen Research in collaboration with the researchers. Dr. Gökbuget reported financial relationships with Amgen and Pfizer. Other authors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Gökbuget N et al. Blood. 2018 Apr 5;131(14):1522-31.
The study by Dr. Gökbuget and her colleagues provides “strong evidence” that blinatumomab immunotherapy eliminates residual B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, thereby preventing relapse and improving survival, according to Patrick Brown, MD.
“This addresses the most important unsolved clinical problem in adults with B-ALL: the development of chemotherapy-resistant relapsed disease,” Dr. Brown wrote in an editorial.
Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) is the strongest independent predictor of outcomes in B-cell ALL, and is seen in up to 50% of adult patients after chemotherapy, according to Dr. Brown.
The “well-designed and well-executed” multicenter phase 2 study demonstrated an MRD clearance rate of 78% after one cycle of blinatumomab with modest adverse effects, according to Dr. Brown. Moreover, the results show a doubling of overall survival and tripling of relapse-free survival in MRD responders versus nonresponders, he said.
“An important caveat, however, is that, although the MRD clearance rate was no lower in the 35% of patients who had already relapsed once before enrolling, these patients had a substantially inferior RFS [relapse-free survival] and OS [overall survival], compared with those treated in first remission,” he added. “The clear lesson is that the impact of immunotherapeutic clearance of MRD on survival is greatest when applied early in the disease course.
The “most pressing question” not answered by this study is the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after complete MRD response, since the study allowed optional HSCT.
Patrick A. Brown, MD, is with Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. These comments are adapted from his editorial in Blood (2018;131:1497-8). Dr. Brown reported having no competing financial interests related to his editorial.
The study by Dr. Gökbuget and her colleagues provides “strong evidence” that blinatumomab immunotherapy eliminates residual B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, thereby preventing relapse and improving survival, according to Patrick Brown, MD.
“This addresses the most important unsolved clinical problem in adults with B-ALL: the development of chemotherapy-resistant relapsed disease,” Dr. Brown wrote in an editorial.
Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) is the strongest independent predictor of outcomes in B-cell ALL, and is seen in up to 50% of adult patients after chemotherapy, according to Dr. Brown.
The “well-designed and well-executed” multicenter phase 2 study demonstrated an MRD clearance rate of 78% after one cycle of blinatumomab with modest adverse effects, according to Dr. Brown. Moreover, the results show a doubling of overall survival and tripling of relapse-free survival in MRD responders versus nonresponders, he said.
“An important caveat, however, is that, although the MRD clearance rate was no lower in the 35% of patients who had already relapsed once before enrolling, these patients had a substantially inferior RFS [relapse-free survival] and OS [overall survival], compared with those treated in first remission,” he added. “The clear lesson is that the impact of immunotherapeutic clearance of MRD on survival is greatest when applied early in the disease course.
The “most pressing question” not answered by this study is the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after complete MRD response, since the study allowed optional HSCT.
Patrick A. Brown, MD, is with Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. These comments are adapted from his editorial in Blood (2018;131:1497-8). Dr. Brown reported having no competing financial interests related to his editorial.
The study by Dr. Gökbuget and her colleagues provides “strong evidence” that blinatumomab immunotherapy eliminates residual B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cells, thereby preventing relapse and improving survival, according to Patrick Brown, MD.
“This addresses the most important unsolved clinical problem in adults with B-ALL: the development of chemotherapy-resistant relapsed disease,” Dr. Brown wrote in an editorial.
Persistence of minimal residual disease (MRD) is the strongest independent predictor of outcomes in B-cell ALL, and is seen in up to 50% of adult patients after chemotherapy, according to Dr. Brown.
The “well-designed and well-executed” multicenter phase 2 study demonstrated an MRD clearance rate of 78% after one cycle of blinatumomab with modest adverse effects, according to Dr. Brown. Moreover, the results show a doubling of overall survival and tripling of relapse-free survival in MRD responders versus nonresponders, he said.
“An important caveat, however, is that, although the MRD clearance rate was no lower in the 35% of patients who had already relapsed once before enrolling, these patients had a substantially inferior RFS [relapse-free survival] and OS [overall survival], compared with those treated in first remission,” he added. “The clear lesson is that the impact of immunotherapeutic clearance of MRD on survival is greatest when applied early in the disease course.
The “most pressing question” not answered by this study is the impact of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation after complete MRD response, since the study allowed optional HSCT.
Patrick A. Brown, MD, is with Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. These comments are adapted from his editorial in Blood (2018;131:1497-8). Dr. Brown reported having no competing financial interests related to his editorial.
After treatment with blinatumomab, most patients with minimal residual disease–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) achieved complete MRD response, according to results of a single-arm phase 2 study.
Achieving complete MRD response was associated with significantly longer relapse-free and overall survival in the patients, who were already in hematologic complete remission, researchers reported in the journal Blood.
“Our results suggest that targeted treatment in early stages of MRD is a viable therapeutic strategy for patients with B-cell precursor ALL and that it should also be evaluated in other hematologic malignancies,” Nicola Gökbuget, MD, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany, and her coauthors wrote.
This is the first international multicenter study to specifically enroll MRD-positive ALL patients and evaluate them for an MRD-based primary outcome in a cohort of MRD-positive ALL patients, according to the authors.
Preemptively treating low but measurable disease in ALL in remission, instead of waiting for overt relapse, is a strategy that may prolong overall survival, Dr. Gökbuget and her colleagues said in describing the rationale for their study. While there is no standard therapy yet for ALL patients with detectable MRD after intensive chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended, based on data that it may improve outcomes in patients with persistent MRD. However, other studies suggest detectable MRD before HSCT is associated with higher relapse rates, and many patients relapse while waiting for HSCT, the researchers noted.
To test an MRD-directed treatment strategy, Dr. Gökbuget and colleagues at 46 centers in Europe and Russia conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study including 116 patients with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission. Patients in the study received up to four cycles of blinatumomab, a bispecific, T cell–engager antibody construct that enables T cells to recognize and eliminate CD19-positive cells.
Of 113 evaluable patients, 88 (78%) achieved complete MRD response after one cycle, the primary end point of the study. Relapse-free survival at 18 months was estimated at 54% and median overall survival was 36.5 months in the subset of 110 patients with Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL in hematologic remission.
Complete MRD responders had improved relapse-free survival versus MRD nonresponders (23.6 vs. 5.7 months; P = .002), they reported. Likewise, overall survival was improved for MRD responders (38.9 vs. 12.5 months; P = .002).
Adverse events were consistent with what was previously reported for blinatumomab and included grade 3 and 4 neurologic events in 12 patients (10%) and 3 patients (3%), respectively. Cytokine-release syndrome was seen in four patients, with grade 1 and grade 3 cases.
The study was not designed to assess the impact of HSCT, which most patients (n = 76) underwent. However, a number of patients with complete MRD response but no HSCT remained in long-term remission, confirming results of an earlier blinatumomab pilot study, according to the researchers.
“This observation might be of relevance for the development of future treatment strategies, particularly for less fit and elderly patients,” Dr. Gökbuget and her coauthors wrote.
Additional studies are needed to clarify the role and indications for HSCT in this setting, they added.
The study was designed by Amgen Research in collaboration with the researchers. Dr. Gökbuget reported financial relationships with Amgen and Pfizer. Other authors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Gökbuget N et al. Blood. 2018 Apr 5;131(14):1522-31.
After treatment with blinatumomab, most patients with minimal residual disease–positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) achieved complete MRD response, according to results of a single-arm phase 2 study.
Achieving complete MRD response was associated with significantly longer relapse-free and overall survival in the patients, who were already in hematologic complete remission, researchers reported in the journal Blood.
“Our results suggest that targeted treatment in early stages of MRD is a viable therapeutic strategy for patients with B-cell precursor ALL and that it should also be evaluated in other hematologic malignancies,” Nicola Gökbuget, MD, University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany, and her coauthors wrote.
This is the first international multicenter study to specifically enroll MRD-positive ALL patients and evaluate them for an MRD-based primary outcome in a cohort of MRD-positive ALL patients, according to the authors.
Preemptively treating low but measurable disease in ALL in remission, instead of waiting for overt relapse, is a strategy that may prolong overall survival, Dr. Gökbuget and her colleagues said in describing the rationale for their study. While there is no standard therapy yet for ALL patients with detectable MRD after intensive chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is recommended, based on data that it may improve outcomes in patients with persistent MRD. However, other studies suggest detectable MRD before HSCT is associated with higher relapse rates, and many patients relapse while waiting for HSCT, the researchers noted.
To test an MRD-directed treatment strategy, Dr. Gökbuget and colleagues at 46 centers in Europe and Russia conducted an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study including 116 patients with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission. Patients in the study received up to four cycles of blinatumomab, a bispecific, T cell–engager antibody construct that enables T cells to recognize and eliminate CD19-positive cells.
Of 113 evaluable patients, 88 (78%) achieved complete MRD response after one cycle, the primary end point of the study. Relapse-free survival at 18 months was estimated at 54% and median overall survival was 36.5 months in the subset of 110 patients with Philadelphia chromosome–negative ALL in hematologic remission.
Complete MRD responders had improved relapse-free survival versus MRD nonresponders (23.6 vs. 5.7 months; P = .002), they reported. Likewise, overall survival was improved for MRD responders (38.9 vs. 12.5 months; P = .002).
Adverse events were consistent with what was previously reported for blinatumomab and included grade 3 and 4 neurologic events in 12 patients (10%) and 3 patients (3%), respectively. Cytokine-release syndrome was seen in four patients, with grade 1 and grade 3 cases.
The study was not designed to assess the impact of HSCT, which most patients (n = 76) underwent. However, a number of patients with complete MRD response but no HSCT remained in long-term remission, confirming results of an earlier blinatumomab pilot study, according to the researchers.
“This observation might be of relevance for the development of future treatment strategies, particularly for less fit and elderly patients,” Dr. Gökbuget and her coauthors wrote.
Additional studies are needed to clarify the role and indications for HSCT in this setting, they added.
The study was designed by Amgen Research in collaboration with the researchers. Dr. Gökbuget reported financial relationships with Amgen and Pfizer. Other authors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.
SOURCE: Gökbuget N et al. Blood. 2018 Apr 5;131(14):1522-31.
FROM BLOOD
Key clinical point:
Major finding: Complete MRD response, seen in 78% of blinatumomab-treated patients, was associated with improved relapse-free and overall survival.
Study details: An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study including 116 patients with B-cell precursor ALL in hematologic complete remission, conducted at 46 centers in Europe and Russia.
Disclosures: The study was designed by Amgen Research in collaboration with the researchers. Dr. Gökbuget reported financial relationships with Amgen and Pfizer. Other authors reported ties to various pharmaceutical companies.
Source: Gökbuget N et al. Blood. 2018 Apr 5;131(14):1522-31.
MDedge Daily News: Is rosacea a red flag for deeper dangers?
MedPAC wants to curb low-value care. Statins cut sepsis patients’ risk of death. And why reading aloud to kids can cut hyperactivity.
Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
MedPAC wants to curb low-value care. Statins cut sepsis patients’ risk of death. And why reading aloud to kids can cut hyperactivity.
Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
MedPAC wants to curb low-value care. Statins cut sepsis patients’ risk of death. And why reading aloud to kids can cut hyperactivity.
Listen to the MDedge Daily News podcast for all the details on today’s top news.
Studies Look at Monoclonal Antibodies for Resistant Infection
As more hospitalized patients develop infections that are immune to antibiotics, researchers are looking into new preventive therapies. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious-supported researchers are studying monoclonal antibodies and their effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P aeruginosa) and Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus), which are among the antibiotic-resistant bacteria that the World Health Organization says pose the greatest risk to human health.
The monoclonal antibodies can be administered along with standard antibiotic therapy. Monoclonal antibodies have been used in cancer, Ebola, and respiratory syncytial virus but rarely have been used to target bacterial pathogens, National Institute of Health says.
One trial, EVADE, will evaluate the safety of the investigational medicine MEDI3902 and whether it can prevent pneumonia caused by P aeruginosa. The other study, SAATELLITE, will test the safety and efficacy of another investigational medicine, suvratoxumab, against S aureus. The researchers hope to enroll 30 patients from 15 intensive care units.
As more hospitalized patients develop infections that are immune to antibiotics, researchers are looking into new preventive therapies. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious-supported researchers are studying monoclonal antibodies and their effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P aeruginosa) and Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus), which are among the antibiotic-resistant bacteria that the World Health Organization says pose the greatest risk to human health.
The monoclonal antibodies can be administered along with standard antibiotic therapy. Monoclonal antibodies have been used in cancer, Ebola, and respiratory syncytial virus but rarely have been used to target bacterial pathogens, National Institute of Health says.
One trial, EVADE, will evaluate the safety of the investigational medicine MEDI3902 and whether it can prevent pneumonia caused by P aeruginosa. The other study, SAATELLITE, will test the safety and efficacy of another investigational medicine, suvratoxumab, against S aureus. The researchers hope to enroll 30 patients from 15 intensive care units.
As more hospitalized patients develop infections that are immune to antibiotics, researchers are looking into new preventive therapies. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious-supported researchers are studying monoclonal antibodies and their effects on Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P aeruginosa) and Staphylococcus aureus (S aureus), which are among the antibiotic-resistant bacteria that the World Health Organization says pose the greatest risk to human health.
The monoclonal antibodies can be administered along with standard antibiotic therapy. Monoclonal antibodies have been used in cancer, Ebola, and respiratory syncytial virus but rarely have been used to target bacterial pathogens, National Institute of Health says.
One trial, EVADE, will evaluate the safety of the investigational medicine MEDI3902 and whether it can prevent pneumonia caused by P aeruginosa. The other study, SAATELLITE, will test the safety and efficacy of another investigational medicine, suvratoxumab, against S aureus. The researchers hope to enroll 30 patients from 15 intensive care units.
Research reveals new subtypes of DLBCL
New research helps explain why some patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) respond well to immunochemotherapy and others do not.
Researchers analyzed samples from nearly 600 DLBCL patients and identified 4 new genetic subtypes of the disease.
Patients with 2 of these subtypes had overall survival (OS) rates that were roughly twice as high as OS rates in patients with the other 2 subtypes.
Louis M. Staudt, MD, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, and his colleagues described these findings in NEJM.
The researchers noted that the current subtypes of DLBCL—germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL—are associated with OS after treatment with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).
Patients with ABC DLBCL have a much lower OS rate, on average, than patients with GCB DLBCL. However, even in the GCB subgroup, many patients relapse after treatment.
“The first question we wanted to tackle was whether there were other molecular features of the tumors that could help us explain why some people were well-served by chemotherapy,” Dr Staudt said.
“And the second, related question was, if we could understand who was not responding well to treatment, could we understand the genetics of these tumors to suggest new potential therapies beyond chemotherapy? The answer to both questions was ‘yes.’”
Dr Staudt and his colleagues analyzed tumor samples from 574 patients with DLBCL, performing exome and transcriptome sequencing, array-based DNA copy-number analysis, and targeted amplicon resequencing of 372 genes to find recurrent aberrations.
The team also developed an algorithm to discover genetic subtypes based on the co-occurrence of genetic alterations.
In this way, they identified 4 genetic subtypes:
- MCD, which was named based on the co-occurrence of MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations
- BN2, whose name was based on the presence of BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations
- N1, named for NOTCH1 mutations
- EZB, named for EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations.
The researchers said aberrations in multiple genes distinguished each of these subtypes from other DLBCLs, and the subtypes differed phenotypically.
Patients with BN2 or EZB subtypes had much higher OS rates after receiving R-CHOP than patients with MCD or N1 subtypes. The predicted 5-year OS rates were 26% for MCD patients, 36% for N1 patients, 65% for BN2 patients, and 68% for EZB patients.
The researchers said they found evidence to suggest that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on chronic active B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition.
The team also noted that some of the subtypes they identified can be found in both ABC and GCB DLBCLs. For example, a patient could have ABC DLBCL, which is associated with a lower OS rate after R-CHOP, but also have the BN2 genetic subtype that responds well to R-CHOP.
“This shows we’ve gone beyond where we were,” Dr Staudt said. “Before, even with our most advanced molecular diagnosis, we would have said all ABC tumors are the ‘bad’ type, and they need to be treated aggressively.”
“Now, we can implement this kind of classification and say that, even if a patient has the ‘bad’ ABC type, they have the ‘good’ genetic type, BN2. So there’s a much better chance of chemotherapy curing the disease.”
Data from this study will be shared through the National Cancer Institute’s Genomic Data Commons to make it available for future research.
Dr Staudt said he and his colleagues hope their new molecular classification will be used in clinical trials so that DLBCL treatment can move toward more targeted therapies.
“The goal is to find the right drug for the right person at the right time,” Dr Staudt said. “And we feel this genetic understanding of diffuse lymphoma is a step forward in precision therapy.”
New research helps explain why some patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) respond well to immunochemotherapy and others do not.
Researchers analyzed samples from nearly 600 DLBCL patients and identified 4 new genetic subtypes of the disease.
Patients with 2 of these subtypes had overall survival (OS) rates that were roughly twice as high as OS rates in patients with the other 2 subtypes.
Louis M. Staudt, MD, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, and his colleagues described these findings in NEJM.
The researchers noted that the current subtypes of DLBCL—germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL—are associated with OS after treatment with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).
Patients with ABC DLBCL have a much lower OS rate, on average, than patients with GCB DLBCL. However, even in the GCB subgroup, many patients relapse after treatment.
“The first question we wanted to tackle was whether there were other molecular features of the tumors that could help us explain why some people were well-served by chemotherapy,” Dr Staudt said.
“And the second, related question was, if we could understand who was not responding well to treatment, could we understand the genetics of these tumors to suggest new potential therapies beyond chemotherapy? The answer to both questions was ‘yes.’”
Dr Staudt and his colleagues analyzed tumor samples from 574 patients with DLBCL, performing exome and transcriptome sequencing, array-based DNA copy-number analysis, and targeted amplicon resequencing of 372 genes to find recurrent aberrations.
The team also developed an algorithm to discover genetic subtypes based on the co-occurrence of genetic alterations.
In this way, they identified 4 genetic subtypes:
- MCD, which was named based on the co-occurrence of MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations
- BN2, whose name was based on the presence of BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations
- N1, named for NOTCH1 mutations
- EZB, named for EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations.
The researchers said aberrations in multiple genes distinguished each of these subtypes from other DLBCLs, and the subtypes differed phenotypically.
Patients with BN2 or EZB subtypes had much higher OS rates after receiving R-CHOP than patients with MCD or N1 subtypes. The predicted 5-year OS rates were 26% for MCD patients, 36% for N1 patients, 65% for BN2 patients, and 68% for EZB patients.
The researchers said they found evidence to suggest that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on chronic active B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition.
The team also noted that some of the subtypes they identified can be found in both ABC and GCB DLBCLs. For example, a patient could have ABC DLBCL, which is associated with a lower OS rate after R-CHOP, but also have the BN2 genetic subtype that responds well to R-CHOP.
“This shows we’ve gone beyond where we were,” Dr Staudt said. “Before, even with our most advanced molecular diagnosis, we would have said all ABC tumors are the ‘bad’ type, and they need to be treated aggressively.”
“Now, we can implement this kind of classification and say that, even if a patient has the ‘bad’ ABC type, they have the ‘good’ genetic type, BN2. So there’s a much better chance of chemotherapy curing the disease.”
Data from this study will be shared through the National Cancer Institute’s Genomic Data Commons to make it available for future research.
Dr Staudt said he and his colleagues hope their new molecular classification will be used in clinical trials so that DLBCL treatment can move toward more targeted therapies.
“The goal is to find the right drug for the right person at the right time,” Dr Staudt said. “And we feel this genetic understanding of diffuse lymphoma is a step forward in precision therapy.”
New research helps explain why some patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) respond well to immunochemotherapy and others do not.
Researchers analyzed samples from nearly 600 DLBCL patients and identified 4 new genetic subtypes of the disease.
Patients with 2 of these subtypes had overall survival (OS) rates that were roughly twice as high as OS rates in patients with the other 2 subtypes.
Louis M. Staudt, MD, PhD, of the National Cancer Institute in Bethesda, Maryland, and his colleagues described these findings in NEJM.
The researchers noted that the current subtypes of DLBCL—germinal center B-cell-like (GCB) and activated B-cell-like (ABC) DLBCL—are associated with OS after treatment with R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone).
Patients with ABC DLBCL have a much lower OS rate, on average, than patients with GCB DLBCL. However, even in the GCB subgroup, many patients relapse after treatment.
“The first question we wanted to tackle was whether there were other molecular features of the tumors that could help us explain why some people were well-served by chemotherapy,” Dr Staudt said.
“And the second, related question was, if we could understand who was not responding well to treatment, could we understand the genetics of these tumors to suggest new potential therapies beyond chemotherapy? The answer to both questions was ‘yes.’”
Dr Staudt and his colleagues analyzed tumor samples from 574 patients with DLBCL, performing exome and transcriptome sequencing, array-based DNA copy-number analysis, and targeted amplicon resequencing of 372 genes to find recurrent aberrations.
The team also developed an algorithm to discover genetic subtypes based on the co-occurrence of genetic alterations.
In this way, they identified 4 genetic subtypes:
- MCD, which was named based on the co-occurrence of MYD88L265P and CD79B mutations
- BN2, whose name was based on the presence of BCL6 fusions and NOTCH2 mutations
- N1, named for NOTCH1 mutations
- EZB, named for EZH2 mutations and BCL2 translocations.
The researchers said aberrations in multiple genes distinguished each of these subtypes from other DLBCLs, and the subtypes differed phenotypically.
Patients with BN2 or EZB subtypes had much higher OS rates after receiving R-CHOP than patients with MCD or N1 subtypes. The predicted 5-year OS rates were 26% for MCD patients, 36% for N1 patients, 65% for BN2 patients, and 68% for EZB patients.
The researchers said they found evidence to suggest that MCD and BN2 DLBCLs rely on chronic active B-cell receptor signaling that is amenable to therapeutic inhibition.
The team also noted that some of the subtypes they identified can be found in both ABC and GCB DLBCLs. For example, a patient could have ABC DLBCL, which is associated with a lower OS rate after R-CHOP, but also have the BN2 genetic subtype that responds well to R-CHOP.
“This shows we’ve gone beyond where we were,” Dr Staudt said. “Before, even with our most advanced molecular diagnosis, we would have said all ABC tumors are the ‘bad’ type, and they need to be treated aggressively.”
“Now, we can implement this kind of classification and say that, even if a patient has the ‘bad’ ABC type, they have the ‘good’ genetic type, BN2. So there’s a much better chance of chemotherapy curing the disease.”
Data from this study will be shared through the National Cancer Institute’s Genomic Data Commons to make it available for future research.
Dr Staudt said he and his colleagues hope their new molecular classification will be used in clinical trials so that DLBCL treatment can move toward more targeted therapies.
“The goal is to find the right drug for the right person at the right time,” Dr Staudt said. “And we feel this genetic understanding of diffuse lymphoma is a step forward in precision therapy.”
Drug shows promise for treating AML, MDS
Preclinical results support clinical testing of an experimental agent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to researchers.
The agent, ALRN-6924, was shown to combat AML and MDS by restoring activity of the tumor-suppressing protein p53.
ALRN-6924 exhibited antileukemic activity in AML cells and mouse models of the disease, as well as in a patient with MDS and excess leukemic blasts who received the drug on a compassionate-use basis.
These results, published in Science Translational Medicine, have led to a phase 1 trial of ALRN-6924 in patients with AML or MDS.
ALRN-6924 was developed by Aileron Therapeutics Inc., to target p53 by inhibiting 2 naturally occurring proteins, MDMX and MDM2. Overexpression of these proteins inactivates p53, allowing cancer cells to multiply unchecked.
In the current study, researchers set out to confirm ALRN-6924’s mechanism of action and determine the efficacy of the drug in AML/MDS. This work was supported, in part, by grants from Aileron Therapeutics Inc., and the National Institutes of Health.
The researchers did find that ALRN-6924 targets both MDMX and MDM2, blocking their interaction with p53 in AML cells.
The team said ALRN-6924 inhibited proliferation by inducing cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in AML cell lines and AML patient cells, including leukemic stem cell-enriched populations.
“This is important because AML is driven by stem cells, and, if you don’t target stem cells, the disease will come back very quickly,” said study author Ulrich Steidl, MD, PhD, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York.
The researchers also found that ALRN-6924 greatly increased survival in a mouse model of AML. The median survival was 34 days in vehicle-treated control mice, 83 days in mice that received ALRN-6924 at 20 mg/kg twice a week, and 151 days in mice that received ALRN-6924 at 20 mg/kg three times a week.
“This is a very striking response,” Dr Steidl said. “Most experimental drugs for leukemia achieve an increase in survival of only a few days in these preclinical models. Even more importantly, ALRN-6924 effectively cured about 40% of the treated mice, meaning they were disease-free more than 1 year after treatment, essentially a lifetime for a mouse.”
Finally, the researchers assessed the effects of ALRN-6924 in a patient who had high-risk MDS with excess leukemic blasts.
The team found the p53 protein “was rapidly induced” in CD34+ leukemic blasts but not in healthy lymphocytes. And ALRN-6924 reduced the number of malignant cells circulating in the blood.
“This test was not designed to assess the efficacy of the drug in humans,” Dr Steidl noted. “That has to be done in a proper clinical trial. Our goal was to determine whether it can hit the desired target in human cells in a clinical setting, which it did in this individual.”
ALRN-6924 is a stapled alpha-helical peptide, a class of drugs whose helical structure is stabilized using hydrocarbon “staples.” The stapling prevents the peptides from being degraded by enzymes before reaching their intended target. ALRN-6924 is the first stapled peptide therapeutic to be tested in patients.
In the phase 1 trial (NCT02909972), researchers are testing ALRN-6924 in patients with relapsed/refractory AML or advanced MDS.
Preclinical results support clinical testing of an experimental agent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to researchers.
The agent, ALRN-6924, was shown to combat AML and MDS by restoring activity of the tumor-suppressing protein p53.
ALRN-6924 exhibited antileukemic activity in AML cells and mouse models of the disease, as well as in a patient with MDS and excess leukemic blasts who received the drug on a compassionate-use basis.
These results, published in Science Translational Medicine, have led to a phase 1 trial of ALRN-6924 in patients with AML or MDS.
ALRN-6924 was developed by Aileron Therapeutics Inc., to target p53 by inhibiting 2 naturally occurring proteins, MDMX and MDM2. Overexpression of these proteins inactivates p53, allowing cancer cells to multiply unchecked.
In the current study, researchers set out to confirm ALRN-6924’s mechanism of action and determine the efficacy of the drug in AML/MDS. This work was supported, in part, by grants from Aileron Therapeutics Inc., and the National Institutes of Health.
The researchers did find that ALRN-6924 targets both MDMX and MDM2, blocking their interaction with p53 in AML cells.
The team said ALRN-6924 inhibited proliferation by inducing cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in AML cell lines and AML patient cells, including leukemic stem cell-enriched populations.
“This is important because AML is driven by stem cells, and, if you don’t target stem cells, the disease will come back very quickly,” said study author Ulrich Steidl, MD, PhD, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York.
The researchers also found that ALRN-6924 greatly increased survival in a mouse model of AML. The median survival was 34 days in vehicle-treated control mice, 83 days in mice that received ALRN-6924 at 20 mg/kg twice a week, and 151 days in mice that received ALRN-6924 at 20 mg/kg three times a week.
“This is a very striking response,” Dr Steidl said. “Most experimental drugs for leukemia achieve an increase in survival of only a few days in these preclinical models. Even more importantly, ALRN-6924 effectively cured about 40% of the treated mice, meaning they were disease-free more than 1 year after treatment, essentially a lifetime for a mouse.”
Finally, the researchers assessed the effects of ALRN-6924 in a patient who had high-risk MDS with excess leukemic blasts.
The team found the p53 protein “was rapidly induced” in CD34+ leukemic blasts but not in healthy lymphocytes. And ALRN-6924 reduced the number of malignant cells circulating in the blood.
“This test was not designed to assess the efficacy of the drug in humans,” Dr Steidl noted. “That has to be done in a proper clinical trial. Our goal was to determine whether it can hit the desired target in human cells in a clinical setting, which it did in this individual.”
ALRN-6924 is a stapled alpha-helical peptide, a class of drugs whose helical structure is stabilized using hydrocarbon “staples.” The stapling prevents the peptides from being degraded by enzymes before reaching their intended target. ALRN-6924 is the first stapled peptide therapeutic to be tested in patients.
In the phase 1 trial (NCT02909972), researchers are testing ALRN-6924 in patients with relapsed/refractory AML or advanced MDS.
Preclinical results support clinical testing of an experimental agent in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), according to researchers.
The agent, ALRN-6924, was shown to combat AML and MDS by restoring activity of the tumor-suppressing protein p53.
ALRN-6924 exhibited antileukemic activity in AML cells and mouse models of the disease, as well as in a patient with MDS and excess leukemic blasts who received the drug on a compassionate-use basis.
These results, published in Science Translational Medicine, have led to a phase 1 trial of ALRN-6924 in patients with AML or MDS.
ALRN-6924 was developed by Aileron Therapeutics Inc., to target p53 by inhibiting 2 naturally occurring proteins, MDMX and MDM2. Overexpression of these proteins inactivates p53, allowing cancer cells to multiply unchecked.
In the current study, researchers set out to confirm ALRN-6924’s mechanism of action and determine the efficacy of the drug in AML/MDS. This work was supported, in part, by grants from Aileron Therapeutics Inc., and the National Institutes of Health.
The researchers did find that ALRN-6924 targets both MDMX and MDM2, blocking their interaction with p53 in AML cells.
The team said ALRN-6924 inhibited proliferation by inducing cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in AML cell lines and AML patient cells, including leukemic stem cell-enriched populations.
“This is important because AML is driven by stem cells, and, if you don’t target stem cells, the disease will come back very quickly,” said study author Ulrich Steidl, MD, PhD, of Albert Einstein College of Medicine in Bronx, New York.
The researchers also found that ALRN-6924 greatly increased survival in a mouse model of AML. The median survival was 34 days in vehicle-treated control mice, 83 days in mice that received ALRN-6924 at 20 mg/kg twice a week, and 151 days in mice that received ALRN-6924 at 20 mg/kg three times a week.
“This is a very striking response,” Dr Steidl said. “Most experimental drugs for leukemia achieve an increase in survival of only a few days in these preclinical models. Even more importantly, ALRN-6924 effectively cured about 40% of the treated mice, meaning they were disease-free more than 1 year after treatment, essentially a lifetime for a mouse.”
Finally, the researchers assessed the effects of ALRN-6924 in a patient who had high-risk MDS with excess leukemic blasts.
The team found the p53 protein “was rapidly induced” in CD34+ leukemic blasts but not in healthy lymphocytes. And ALRN-6924 reduced the number of malignant cells circulating in the blood.
“This test was not designed to assess the efficacy of the drug in humans,” Dr Steidl noted. “That has to be done in a proper clinical trial. Our goal was to determine whether it can hit the desired target in human cells in a clinical setting, which it did in this individual.”
ALRN-6924 is a stapled alpha-helical peptide, a class of drugs whose helical structure is stabilized using hydrocarbon “staples.” The stapling prevents the peptides from being degraded by enzymes before reaching their intended target. ALRN-6924 is the first stapled peptide therapeutic to be tested in patients.
In the phase 1 trial (NCT02909972), researchers are testing ALRN-6924 in patients with relapsed/refractory AML or advanced MDS.
Group identifies novel genes involved in MM development
Researchers have identified novel genes involved in the development of multiple myeloma (MM), according to a paper published in Leukemia.
The team’s analyses revealed regions of coding and non-coding DNA that appear to drive MM development.
The researchers analyzed whole-exome sequencing data from 804 MM patients and whole-genome sequencing data from 765 MM patients.
This revealed 16 novel genes that were disrupted in coding regions of DNA and 15 novel genes disrupted in non-coding regions.
There were 5 genes disrupted by structural variants in coding regions—CD96, PRDM1, FBXW7, MAP3K14, and CCND2.
There were also 11 genes disrupted by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels in coding regions—BAX, C8orf86, FAM154B, FTL, HIST1H4H, LEMD2, PABPC1, RPN1, RPS3A, SGPP1, and TBC1D29.
Among the novel genes disrupted by mutations in non-coding regions was NBPF1, a promoter disrupted by SNVs. The researchers noted that NBPF1 is directly regulated by NF-κB, and the NF-κB pathway is recurrently affected in MM.
The team also identified 7 cis-regulatory elements (CREs) disrupted by SNVs—CALCB, COBLL1, HOXB3, ST6GAL1, PAX5, ATP13A2, and TPRG1.
The researchers said the SNVs in PAX5 and HOXB3 reduced gene expression, suggesting PAX5 and HOXB3 function as tumor suppressors in MM. On the other hand, the SNVs in ST6GAL1 increased gene expression, which may contribute to the aberrant immunoglobulin-G glycosylation seen in MM.
Finally, there were 7 CREs disrupted by copy number variations—MYC, PLD4, KDM3B, SP110, RAB36, PACS2, and TEX22.
The researchers noted that, with the exception of MYC, these genes reside close to regions of common structural variation, so their relevance in MM is not clear.
The team also said it’s well known that MYC is upregulated in MM through gene amplification or translocation, but this research shows that MYC can be dysregulated by alternative mechanisms.
“We need smarter, kinder treatments for myeloma that are more tailored to each person’s cancer,” said study author Richard Houlston, MD, PhD, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK.
“Exhaustive genetic research like this is helping us to make that possible. Our findings should now open up new avenues for discovering treatments that target the genes driving myeloma.”
Researchers have identified novel genes involved in the development of multiple myeloma (MM), according to a paper published in Leukemia.
The team’s analyses revealed regions of coding and non-coding DNA that appear to drive MM development.
The researchers analyzed whole-exome sequencing data from 804 MM patients and whole-genome sequencing data from 765 MM patients.
This revealed 16 novel genes that were disrupted in coding regions of DNA and 15 novel genes disrupted in non-coding regions.
There were 5 genes disrupted by structural variants in coding regions—CD96, PRDM1, FBXW7, MAP3K14, and CCND2.
There were also 11 genes disrupted by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels in coding regions—BAX, C8orf86, FAM154B, FTL, HIST1H4H, LEMD2, PABPC1, RPN1, RPS3A, SGPP1, and TBC1D29.
Among the novel genes disrupted by mutations in non-coding regions was NBPF1, a promoter disrupted by SNVs. The researchers noted that NBPF1 is directly regulated by NF-κB, and the NF-κB pathway is recurrently affected in MM.
The team also identified 7 cis-regulatory elements (CREs) disrupted by SNVs—CALCB, COBLL1, HOXB3, ST6GAL1, PAX5, ATP13A2, and TPRG1.
The researchers said the SNVs in PAX5 and HOXB3 reduced gene expression, suggesting PAX5 and HOXB3 function as tumor suppressors in MM. On the other hand, the SNVs in ST6GAL1 increased gene expression, which may contribute to the aberrant immunoglobulin-G glycosylation seen in MM.
Finally, there were 7 CREs disrupted by copy number variations—MYC, PLD4, KDM3B, SP110, RAB36, PACS2, and TEX22.
The researchers noted that, with the exception of MYC, these genes reside close to regions of common structural variation, so their relevance in MM is not clear.
The team also said it’s well known that MYC is upregulated in MM through gene amplification or translocation, but this research shows that MYC can be dysregulated by alternative mechanisms.
“We need smarter, kinder treatments for myeloma that are more tailored to each person’s cancer,” said study author Richard Houlston, MD, PhD, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK.
“Exhaustive genetic research like this is helping us to make that possible. Our findings should now open up new avenues for discovering treatments that target the genes driving myeloma.”
Researchers have identified novel genes involved in the development of multiple myeloma (MM), according to a paper published in Leukemia.
The team’s analyses revealed regions of coding and non-coding DNA that appear to drive MM development.
The researchers analyzed whole-exome sequencing data from 804 MM patients and whole-genome sequencing data from 765 MM patients.
This revealed 16 novel genes that were disrupted in coding regions of DNA and 15 novel genes disrupted in non-coding regions.
There were 5 genes disrupted by structural variants in coding regions—CD96, PRDM1, FBXW7, MAP3K14, and CCND2.
There were also 11 genes disrupted by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels in coding regions—BAX, C8orf86, FAM154B, FTL, HIST1H4H, LEMD2, PABPC1, RPN1, RPS3A, SGPP1, and TBC1D29.
Among the novel genes disrupted by mutations in non-coding regions was NBPF1, a promoter disrupted by SNVs. The researchers noted that NBPF1 is directly regulated by NF-κB, and the NF-κB pathway is recurrently affected in MM.
The team also identified 7 cis-regulatory elements (CREs) disrupted by SNVs—CALCB, COBLL1, HOXB3, ST6GAL1, PAX5, ATP13A2, and TPRG1.
The researchers said the SNVs in PAX5 and HOXB3 reduced gene expression, suggesting PAX5 and HOXB3 function as tumor suppressors in MM. On the other hand, the SNVs in ST6GAL1 increased gene expression, which may contribute to the aberrant immunoglobulin-G glycosylation seen in MM.
Finally, there were 7 CREs disrupted by copy number variations—MYC, PLD4, KDM3B, SP110, RAB36, PACS2, and TEX22.
The researchers noted that, with the exception of MYC, these genes reside close to regions of common structural variation, so their relevance in MM is not clear.
The team also said it’s well known that MYC is upregulated in MM through gene amplification or translocation, but this research shows that MYC can be dysregulated by alternative mechanisms.
“We need smarter, kinder treatments for myeloma that are more tailored to each person’s cancer,” said study author Richard Houlston, MD, PhD, of The Institute of Cancer Research in London, UK.
“Exhaustive genetic research like this is helping us to make that possible. Our findings should now open up new avenues for discovering treatments that target the genes driving myeloma.”
Generic antiemetic now available in US
Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection, a generic alternative to Aloxi®, is now available in the US.
Fresenius Kabi’s Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor that is approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in certain adults.
Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is available in a single-dose vial (0.25 mg per 5 mL).
In the US, Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
The drug is also approved for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
And Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting for up to 24 hours after surgery. Efficacy beyond 24 hours has not been demonstrated.
The full prescribing information for Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection can be found on the Fresenius Kabi website.
Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection, a generic alternative to Aloxi®, is now available in the US.
Fresenius Kabi’s Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor that is approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in certain adults.
Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is available in a single-dose vial (0.25 mg per 5 mL).
In the US, Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
The drug is also approved for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
And Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting for up to 24 hours after surgery. Efficacy beyond 24 hours has not been demonstrated.
The full prescribing information for Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection can be found on the Fresenius Kabi website.
Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection, a generic alternative to Aloxi®, is now available in the US.
Fresenius Kabi’s Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is a 5-HT3 serotonin receptor that is approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in certain adults.
Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is available in a single-dose vial (0.25 mg per 5 mL).
In the US, Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of moderately emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
The drug is also approved for the prevention of acute nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy.
And Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection is approved for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting for up to 24 hours after surgery. Efficacy beyond 24 hours has not been demonstrated.
The full prescribing information for Palonosetron Hydrochloride Injection can be found on the Fresenius Kabi website.
Lighter skin on left cheek
The FP made the diagnosis of nevus depigmentosus.
Nevus depigmentosus is usually present at birth or develops in early childhood. There is a decreased number of melanosomes within a normal number of melanocytes. The hypopigmented area typically has a serrated or jagged edge and has been compared to the appearance of a continent.
Nevus depigmentosus presents no danger or increased malignant potential. Excision, which is not an advisable option, is the only available treatment. Patients who want to camouflage the appearance of the hypopigmentation can use cover-up makeup.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M, Usatine R. Benign nevi. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:945-952.
To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.
You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.
The FP made the diagnosis of nevus depigmentosus.
Nevus depigmentosus is usually present at birth or develops in early childhood. There is a decreased number of melanosomes within a normal number of melanocytes. The hypopigmented area typically has a serrated or jagged edge and has been compared to the appearance of a continent.
Nevus depigmentosus presents no danger or increased malignant potential. Excision, which is not an advisable option, is the only available treatment. Patients who want to camouflage the appearance of the hypopigmentation can use cover-up makeup.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M, Usatine R. Benign nevi. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:945-952.
To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.
You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.
The FP made the diagnosis of nevus depigmentosus.
Nevus depigmentosus is usually present at birth or develops in early childhood. There is a decreased number of melanosomes within a normal number of melanocytes. The hypopigmented area typically has a serrated or jagged edge and has been compared to the appearance of a continent.
Nevus depigmentosus presents no danger or increased malignant potential. Excision, which is not an advisable option, is the only available treatment. Patients who want to camouflage the appearance of the hypopigmentation can use cover-up makeup.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Smith M, Usatine R. Benign nevi. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. Color Atlas of Family Medicine. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2013:945-952.
To learn more about the Color Atlas of Family Medicine, see: www.amazon.com/Color-Family-Medicine-Richard-Usatine/dp/0071769641/.
You can now get the second edition of the Color Atlas of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: usatinemedia.com.
Rare, serious alemtuzumab adverse events emerge
according to three new case reports and series in Neurology.
The complications include acute coronary syndrome in one patient, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in two patients, and acute acalculous cholecystitis in eight patients.
Postmarketing surveillance aims to identify rare and late adverse events that may not be discovered during clinical trials.
The cardiac arrest incident occurred in a 24-year old woman with spinal-onset relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) during alemtuzumab infusion. She had experienced two clinical relapses and a significant increase in cerebral and spinal MRI lesion load, despite previous treatment with natalizumab (Tysabri). The only striking thing about her medical history was allergic asthma.
On the third day of treatment, she developed severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (HR, 38 beats per minute), which resolved with treatment, and clinicians continued the regimen. The following morning, she experienced acute coronary syndrome, which later resolved.
The authors recommend that clinicians treating RRMS patients with alemtuzumab consider a baseline preinfusion ECG and monitoring heart rate at least hourly while infusion is being carried out.
The HLH cases occurred in a man and a woman with RRMS, both in their 20s. The woman was switched from natalizumab to alemtuzumab because of a high anti-JC virus antibody index. Both cases presented in the time frame typical of secondary autoimmunity. The female patient had an acalculous gallbladder with thickened walls and pericholecystic fluid and responded to intravenous antibiotics, but 3 weeks later she developed thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and anemia with abnormal liver enzymes. Treatment failed and she succumbed to the condition.
The man received alemtuzumab as first-line therapy for RRMS during the Keratinocyte Growth Factor to Prevent Autoimmunity After Alemtuzumab Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (CAM-THY) clinical trial. He received boluses of either placebo or palifermin (Kepivance) before and after each alemtuzumab dose in order to reduce secondary autoimmunity. At 30 months after his initial cycle of alemtuzumab, he was admitted to the hospital with HLH and also developed acquired factor VIII hemophilia. He responded positively to 4 months of corticosteroid treatment combined with two doses of rituximab (Rituxan) and ultimately returned to work. However, he experienced a relapse of acquired hemophilia during later doses of corticosteroids and rituximab.
A search of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) revealed eight cases of acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) – four assessed as possibly caused by alemtuzumab, and four assessed as probable – that occurred in patients with RRMS. Seven of the cases involved presentation during treatment or soon afterward, which suggests that acute cytokine release syndrome (ACRS) may be the cause. The cases did not share all of the manifestations of typical ACRS, but the researchers noted that coadministration of methylprednisolone in the RRMS dosing schedule may have masked some of the features.
Unlike typical AAC, these cases occurred primarily in females (six of eight) and were not associated with concurrent critical illnesses. Other risk factors were not consistently present. Historically, AAC is associated with treatment of older male patients in the ICU. Three of the patients underwent surgical treatment, and five received conservative treatment of antibiotics or an unspecified treatment. Seven patients recovered. The outcome in the eighth patient was not reported.
Despite these good outcomes, the authors of the report note that longer-term outcomes in this AAC population are not yet understood.
The findings led to the addition of AAC to the Warnings and Precautions section of the alemtuzumab label in October 2017.
None of the reports received funding. Some of the authors had financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
SOURCES: Croteau D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005422. Saarela M et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005420. Ferraro D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005417.
Clinical trials find most adverse events for a new drug, but postmarketing surveillance is essential to find rare events, even though they may underestimate the frequency of these events because of underreporting.
Other reports suggest the emergence of uncommon infectious complications associated with alemtuzumab, especially Listeria meningitis. Listeria infection can occur within days of alemtuzumab treatment, and the use of preventive sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim treatment is now advocated in the United Kingdom.
Overall, these adverse events remind clinicians that they must balance the benefits of alemtuzumab, which is highly effective, against its potential risks.
Paolo A. Muraro, MD, PhD is a professor of neurology, neuroimmunology, and immunotherapy at Imperial College London. Neil J. Scolding MD, PhD, is director of the Bristol Institute of Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Bristol (England). Robert J. Fox, MD, is a neurologist at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio. All of the authors reported financial relationships with companies marketing MS drugs. Their comments are derived from an editorial accompanying the adverse event reports (Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005409).
Clinical trials find most adverse events for a new drug, but postmarketing surveillance is essential to find rare events, even though they may underestimate the frequency of these events because of underreporting.
Other reports suggest the emergence of uncommon infectious complications associated with alemtuzumab, especially Listeria meningitis. Listeria infection can occur within days of alemtuzumab treatment, and the use of preventive sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim treatment is now advocated in the United Kingdom.
Overall, these adverse events remind clinicians that they must balance the benefits of alemtuzumab, which is highly effective, against its potential risks.
Paolo A. Muraro, MD, PhD is a professor of neurology, neuroimmunology, and immunotherapy at Imperial College London. Neil J. Scolding MD, PhD, is director of the Bristol Institute of Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Bristol (England). Robert J. Fox, MD, is a neurologist at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio. All of the authors reported financial relationships with companies marketing MS drugs. Their comments are derived from an editorial accompanying the adverse event reports (Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005409).
Clinical trials find most adverse events for a new drug, but postmarketing surveillance is essential to find rare events, even though they may underestimate the frequency of these events because of underreporting.
Other reports suggest the emergence of uncommon infectious complications associated with alemtuzumab, especially Listeria meningitis. Listeria infection can occur within days of alemtuzumab treatment, and the use of preventive sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim treatment is now advocated in the United Kingdom.
Overall, these adverse events remind clinicians that they must balance the benefits of alemtuzumab, which is highly effective, against its potential risks.
Paolo A. Muraro, MD, PhD is a professor of neurology, neuroimmunology, and immunotherapy at Imperial College London. Neil J. Scolding MD, PhD, is director of the Bristol Institute of Clinical Neurosciences at the University of Bristol (England). Robert J. Fox, MD, is a neurologist at the Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio. All of the authors reported financial relationships with companies marketing MS drugs. Their comments are derived from an editorial accompanying the adverse event reports (Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005409).
according to three new case reports and series in Neurology.
The complications include acute coronary syndrome in one patient, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in two patients, and acute acalculous cholecystitis in eight patients.
Postmarketing surveillance aims to identify rare and late adverse events that may not be discovered during clinical trials.
The cardiac arrest incident occurred in a 24-year old woman with spinal-onset relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) during alemtuzumab infusion. She had experienced two clinical relapses and a significant increase in cerebral and spinal MRI lesion load, despite previous treatment with natalizumab (Tysabri). The only striking thing about her medical history was allergic asthma.
On the third day of treatment, she developed severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (HR, 38 beats per minute), which resolved with treatment, and clinicians continued the regimen. The following morning, she experienced acute coronary syndrome, which later resolved.
The authors recommend that clinicians treating RRMS patients with alemtuzumab consider a baseline preinfusion ECG and monitoring heart rate at least hourly while infusion is being carried out.
The HLH cases occurred in a man and a woman with RRMS, both in their 20s. The woman was switched from natalizumab to alemtuzumab because of a high anti-JC virus antibody index. Both cases presented in the time frame typical of secondary autoimmunity. The female patient had an acalculous gallbladder with thickened walls and pericholecystic fluid and responded to intravenous antibiotics, but 3 weeks later she developed thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and anemia with abnormal liver enzymes. Treatment failed and she succumbed to the condition.
The man received alemtuzumab as first-line therapy for RRMS during the Keratinocyte Growth Factor to Prevent Autoimmunity After Alemtuzumab Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (CAM-THY) clinical trial. He received boluses of either placebo or palifermin (Kepivance) before and after each alemtuzumab dose in order to reduce secondary autoimmunity. At 30 months after his initial cycle of alemtuzumab, he was admitted to the hospital with HLH and also developed acquired factor VIII hemophilia. He responded positively to 4 months of corticosteroid treatment combined with two doses of rituximab (Rituxan) and ultimately returned to work. However, he experienced a relapse of acquired hemophilia during later doses of corticosteroids and rituximab.
A search of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) revealed eight cases of acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) – four assessed as possibly caused by alemtuzumab, and four assessed as probable – that occurred in patients with RRMS. Seven of the cases involved presentation during treatment or soon afterward, which suggests that acute cytokine release syndrome (ACRS) may be the cause. The cases did not share all of the manifestations of typical ACRS, but the researchers noted that coadministration of methylprednisolone in the RRMS dosing schedule may have masked some of the features.
Unlike typical AAC, these cases occurred primarily in females (six of eight) and were not associated with concurrent critical illnesses. Other risk factors were not consistently present. Historically, AAC is associated with treatment of older male patients in the ICU. Three of the patients underwent surgical treatment, and five received conservative treatment of antibiotics or an unspecified treatment. Seven patients recovered. The outcome in the eighth patient was not reported.
Despite these good outcomes, the authors of the report note that longer-term outcomes in this AAC population are not yet understood.
The findings led to the addition of AAC to the Warnings and Precautions section of the alemtuzumab label in October 2017.
None of the reports received funding. Some of the authors had financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
SOURCES: Croteau D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005422. Saarela M et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005420. Ferraro D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005417.
according to three new case reports and series in Neurology.
The complications include acute coronary syndrome in one patient, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in two patients, and acute acalculous cholecystitis in eight patients.
Postmarketing surveillance aims to identify rare and late adverse events that may not be discovered during clinical trials.
The cardiac arrest incident occurred in a 24-year old woman with spinal-onset relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) during alemtuzumab infusion. She had experienced two clinical relapses and a significant increase in cerebral and spinal MRI lesion load, despite previous treatment with natalizumab (Tysabri). The only striking thing about her medical history was allergic asthma.
On the third day of treatment, she developed severe asymptomatic sinus bradycardia (HR, 38 beats per minute), which resolved with treatment, and clinicians continued the regimen. The following morning, she experienced acute coronary syndrome, which later resolved.
The authors recommend that clinicians treating RRMS patients with alemtuzumab consider a baseline preinfusion ECG and monitoring heart rate at least hourly while infusion is being carried out.
The HLH cases occurred in a man and a woman with RRMS, both in their 20s. The woman was switched from natalizumab to alemtuzumab because of a high anti-JC virus antibody index. Both cases presented in the time frame typical of secondary autoimmunity. The female patient had an acalculous gallbladder with thickened walls and pericholecystic fluid and responded to intravenous antibiotics, but 3 weeks later she developed thrombocytopenia, coagulopathy, and anemia with abnormal liver enzymes. Treatment failed and she succumbed to the condition.
The man received alemtuzumab as first-line therapy for RRMS during the Keratinocyte Growth Factor to Prevent Autoimmunity After Alemtuzumab Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis (CAM-THY) clinical trial. He received boluses of either placebo or palifermin (Kepivance) before and after each alemtuzumab dose in order to reduce secondary autoimmunity. At 30 months after his initial cycle of alemtuzumab, he was admitted to the hospital with HLH and also developed acquired factor VIII hemophilia. He responded positively to 4 months of corticosteroid treatment combined with two doses of rituximab (Rituxan) and ultimately returned to work. However, he experienced a relapse of acquired hemophilia during later doses of corticosteroids and rituximab.
A search of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) revealed eight cases of acute acalculous cholecystitis (AAC) – four assessed as possibly caused by alemtuzumab, and four assessed as probable – that occurred in patients with RRMS. Seven of the cases involved presentation during treatment or soon afterward, which suggests that acute cytokine release syndrome (ACRS) may be the cause. The cases did not share all of the manifestations of typical ACRS, but the researchers noted that coadministration of methylprednisolone in the RRMS dosing schedule may have masked some of the features.
Unlike typical AAC, these cases occurred primarily in females (six of eight) and were not associated with concurrent critical illnesses. Other risk factors were not consistently present. Historically, AAC is associated with treatment of older male patients in the ICU. Three of the patients underwent surgical treatment, and five received conservative treatment of antibiotics or an unspecified treatment. Seven patients recovered. The outcome in the eighth patient was not reported.
Despite these good outcomes, the authors of the report note that longer-term outcomes in this AAC population are not yet understood.
The findings led to the addition of AAC to the Warnings and Precautions section of the alemtuzumab label in October 2017.
None of the reports received funding. Some of the authors had financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
SOURCES: Croteau D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005422. Saarela M et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005420. Ferraro D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005417.
FROM NEUROLOGY
Key clinical point: Rare events associated with alemtuzumab are emerging that were not uncovered during clinical trials.
Major finding: Eight cases of acute acalculous cholecystitis formed the basis for its addition to the Warnings and Precautions section of the alemtuzumab label in October 2017.
Study details: Case reports of acute coronary syndrome in one patient, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in two patients, and acute acalculous cholecystitis in eight patients.
Disclosures: None of the reports received funding. Some of the authors had financial ties to the pharmaceutical industry.
Sources: Croteau D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005422; Saarela M et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005420; Ferraro D et al. Neurology. 2018 Mar 30. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005417.