The number of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures has significantly increased over the past 2 to 3 decades. As life expectancy in the U.S. increases and medical advances allow patients with preexisting conditions to successfully undergo joint replacements, the demand for these procedures is expected to grow.¹ In 2010, the CDC estimated that 719,000 patients underwent TKA procedures and 332,000 patients underwent THA procedures in the U.S.² Kurtz and colleagues have projected that by 2030 the annual number of TKA procedures will increase to 3.5 million and the number of THA procedures will increase to 572,000.¹

Although becoming more prevalent, these procedures are still associated with considerable intra- and postoperative blood loss that may lead to complications and blood transfusions.³ Previous studies have shown that perioperative anemia and red blood cell transfusions are associated with negative outcomes, including increased health care resource utilization; length of hospitalization; pulmonary, septic, wound, or thromboembolic complications; and mortality.^4,5

In order to prevent excessive blood loss during TKA and THA procedures, antifibrinolytic agents, such as tranexamic acid, have been used. Tranexamic acid is a synthetic form of lysine that binds to the lysine-binding sites on plasminogen and slows the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. This interaction inhibits fibrinolysis and theoretically decreases bleeding.⁶ Because tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic, its mechanism of action has raised concerns that it could increase the risk of clotting complications, such as venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction.⁷

Several published meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown that tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Despite positive results, many study authors have acknowledged limitations in their analyses, such as heterogeneity of study results, small trial size, and varied dosing strategies.^3,7-12 There is no FDA-approved tranexamic acid dosing strategy for orthopedic procedures; therefore, its use in TKA and THA procedures is off label. This lack of guidance results in the medication being used at varied doses, timing of doses, and routes of administration with no clear dosing strategy showing the best outcomes.

Tranexamic acid was first used in TKA and THA surgical procedures at the Sioux Falls VA Health Care System (SFVAHCS) in South Dakota in October 2012. The dose used during these procedures was 1 g IV at first surgical incision and 1 g IV at incision closure. The objective of this study was to determine whether this tranexamic acid dosing strategy utilized at SFVAHCS safely improved outcomes related to blood loss.

Methods

A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent TKA and THA procedures by 4 orthopedic surgeons between January 2010 and August 2015 at SFVAHCS. This study received approval by the local institutional review board and research and development committee in September 2015.

Patients were included in the study if they were aged ≥ 18 years and underwent primary unilateral TKA or THA procedures during the study time frame. Patients were excluded if they underwent bilateral or revision TKA or THA procedures, did not have recorded blood loss measurements during and/or after the procedure, or did not receive tranexamic acid between October 2012 and August 2015 at the standard dosing strategy utilized at SFVAHCS.

Patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and October 2012 and did not receive tranexamic acid were included in the control groups. The treatment groups contained patients who underwent surgery between October 2012 and August 2015 and received tranexamic acid at the standard SFVAHCS dosing strategy. Patients in the control and treatment groups were divided and compared with patients who underwent the same type of surgery.

The primary endpoint of this study was total blood loss, which included intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. Intraoperative blood loss was measured by a suctioning device that the surgical physician’s assistant used to keep the surgical site clear of bodily fluids. The suctioning device collected blood as well as irrigation fluids used throughout the surgical procedure. The volume of irrigation fluids used during the procedure was subtracted from the total volume collected by the suctioning device to estimate the total blood volume lost during surgery. Sponges and other surgical materials that may have collected blood were not included in the intraoperative blood loss calculation. Postoperative blood loss was collected by a drain that was placed in the surgical site prior to incision closure. The drain collected postoperative blood loss until it was removed 1 day after surgery.

The secondary endpoints for the study were changes in hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) from before surgery to after surgery. These changes were calculated by subtracting the lowest measured postoperative Hgb or Hct level within 21 days postsurgery from the closest measured Hgb or Hct level obtained presurgery.

Follow-up appointments were routinely conducted 2 weeks after surgery, so the 21-day time frame would include any laboratory results drawn at these appointments. Other secondary endpoints included the number of patients receiving at least 1 blood transfusion during hospitalization and the number of patients experiencing clotting complications within 30 days of surgery. Postoperative and progress notes were reviewed by a single study investigator in order to record blood transfusions and clotting complications.

All patients who underwent TKA or THA procedures were instructed to stop taking antiplatelet agents 7 days prior to surgery and warfarin 5 days prior to surgery. If patients were determined to be at high risk for thromboembolic complications following warfarin discontinuation, therapeutic doses of low-molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin were used as a bridging therapy pre- and postsurgery. Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily was started the day after surgery in all patients not previously on warfarin therapy prior to surgery to prevent clotting complications. If a patient was on warfarin therapy prior to the procedure but not considered to be at high risk of thromboembolic complications by the surgeon, warfarin was restarted after surgery, and enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily was used until therapeutic international normalized ratio values were obtained. If the patient had ongoing bleeding after the procedure or was determined to be at high risk for bleeding complications, the provider may have delayed anticoagulant use.

Some patients who underwent TKA or THA procedures during the study time frame received periarticular pain injections during surgery. These pain injections included a combination of ropivacaine 200 mg, ketorolac 30 mg, epinephrine 0.5 mg, and clonidine 0.08 mg and were compounded in a sterile mixture with normal saline. Several injections of this mixture were administered into the surgical site to reduce postoperative pain. These periarticular pain injections were first implemented into TKA and THA procedures in August 2012 and were used in patients at the surgeon’s discretion.

Baseline characteristics were analyzed using a chi-square test for categoric variables and an unpaired t test for continuous variables to determine whether any differences were present. Total blood loss, change in Hgb, and change in Hct were analyzed using an unpaired t test. Patients receiving at least 1 blood transfusion during hospitalization and patients experiencing a clotting complication were analyzed using a chi-square test. P values < .05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA), and GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Initially, a total of 443 TKA patients and 111 THA patients were reviewed. Of these patients, 418 TKA patients and 100 THA patients met the inclusion criteria. Due to the retrospective design of this study, not all of the baseline characteristics were equal between groups (Table 1). Most notably, the number of patients who received the periarticular pain injection and the distribution of surgeons performing the procedures were different between groups in both the TKA and THA procedures.

Baseline Hgb levels were not found to be different between groups in either type of procedure; however, the baseline Hct levels of patients undergoing TKA who received tranexamic acid were found to be statistically higher when compared with those who did not receive tranexamic acid. Other baseline characteristics with statistically higher values included average weight and BMI in patients who received tranexamic acid and underwent THA and serum creatinine in patients who did not receive tranexamic acid and underwent TKA.

In the primary analysis (Tables 2 and 3), the mean estimated total blood loss in TKA patients was lower in patients who received tranexamic acid than it was in the control group (339.4 mL vs 457.4 mL, P < .001). Patients who underwent THA receiving tranexamic acid similarly had significantly less total blood loss than that of the control group (419.7 mL vs 585.7 mL, P < .001). Consistent with previous studies, patients undergoing TKA procedures in the treatment group when compared to the control group, respectively, were likely to have more blood loss postoperatively (275.9 mL vs 399.7 mL) than intraoperatively (63.5 mL vs 57.7 mL) regardless of tranexamic acid administration.⁶ On the other hand, patients who had undergone THA were more likely to experience more intraoperative blood loss (281.6 mL in treatment group vs 328.9 mL in control group) than postoperative blood loss (138.1 mL in treatment group vs 256.8 mL in control group) regardless of tranexamic acid administration.

In the secondary analysis, the change between preoperative and postoperative Hgb and Hct had results consistent with the total blood loss results. Patients receiving tranexamic acid in TKA procedures had a lower decrease in Hgb compared with the control group (3.3 mg/dL vs 4.0 mg/dL, P < .001). Similarly, patients undergoing TKA who received tranexamic acid had a smaller decrease in Hct than that of the control group (9.4% vs 11.1%, P < .001). Consistent with the TKA procedure results, patients undergoing THA who received tranexamic acid had a smaller decrease in Hgb (3.6 mg/dL vs 4.7 mg/dL, P < .001) and Hct (10.5% vs 13.0%, P = .0012) than that of the control group.

Patients who did not receive tranexamic acid were more likely to require at least 1 blood transfusion than were patients who received tranexamic acid in TKA (14 patients vs 0 patients, P = .0005) and THA procedures (8 patients vs 2 patients, P = .019). Despite the theoretically increased likelihood of clotting complications with tranexamic acid, no significant differences were observed between the treatment and control groups in either TKA (0 vs 4, P = .065) or THA (1 vs 0, P = .363) procedures.

Discussion

Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty are at risk for significant blood loss with a potential need for postoperative blood transfusions.^6,13 The use of tranexamic acid during these procedures offers a possible solution to decrease blood loss and minimize blood transfusions. This study retrospectively evaluated whether tranexamic acid safely decreased blood loss and the need for blood transfusions at SFVAHCS with the dosing strategy of 1 g IV at first incision and 1 g IV at incision closure.

Patients who received tranexamic acid in TKA and THA procedures had significantly less blood loss than did patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. Patients receiving tranexamic acid also had a significantly lower change from preoperative to postoperative Hgb and Hct levels than did patients who did not receive tranexamic acid in TKA and THA procedures. In addition to decreasing blood loss, the tranexamic acid groups had significantly fewer patients who required blood transfusions than that of the control groups.

This reduction in blood transfusions should be considered clinically significant. Blood transfusions require substantial health care resource utilization and may cause complications in recipients.³ There was no clear association between tranexamic acid and clotting complications in this study, which may suggest that this risk is theoretical. However, larger prospective studies would be needed to further examine this potential risk.

Even though baseline Hct levels were found to be significantly different between the tranexamic acid group and the control group for patients who underwent TKA, medical record documentation indicated that the determination whether postoperative blood transfusions were needed was based primarily on Hgb levels. Baseline Hgb levels were found not to be significantly different between the tranexamic acid and control groups for either TKA or THA procedures. This suggests that at baseline the tranexamic acid and control groups had the same risk of reaching the Hgb threshold where blood transfusions would be required.

There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving the periarticular pain injection of ropivacaine, ketorolac, epinephrine, and clonidine between the groups who received tranexamic acid and those who did not. Originally, this baseline characteristic was theorized to be a major confounder in the primary and secondary analyses because epinephrine is a vasoconstrictor and ketorolac is a reversible antiplatelet agent. However, Vendittoli and colleagues showed that patients receiving these periarticular pain injections during surgery actually had greater total blood loss than did patients who did not receive the injections, although this comparison did not reach statistical significance.¹⁴ The Vendittoli and colleagues results suggest that the pain injections did not confound the primary and secondary analyses by aiding in the process of reducing blood loss in these procedures.

Limitations

There are several limitations for extrapolating the results from this study to the general population. Due to the retrospective study design, there was no way to actively control potentially confounding variables during the TKA and THA procedures. Surgeons and surgery teams likely had slightly different techniques and protocols during and after surgery. Several baseline characteristics were not equal between patients who received tranexamic acid and those who did not. Therefore, it is unknown whether these baseline characteristics affected the results of this study. Postoperative anticoagulant use was not recorded and may have differed between study groups, depending on the patient’s risk of thromboembolic complications; however, the drains that collected blood loss were removed prior to the first dose of enoxaparin, which was administered the day after surgery.

Another limitation is that the method of measuring blood loss during and after the procedure was imprecise. Blood not suctioned through the suctioning device during surgery or not collected in the drain after surgery was not measured and may have increased the total blood loss. Hemoglobin and Hct levels also are sensitive to intravascular volume changes. If a patient required more IV fluids during or after a procedure, the fluids may have lowered the Hgb and/or Hct levels by dilution.

Conclusion

This study suggests that using tranexamic acid at a dose of 1 g IV at first incision and 1 g IV at incision closure safely and effectively reduced blood loss and the need for transfusions in patients undergoing TKA and THA procedures at SFVAHCS. Further prospective studies are needed to compare different tranexamic dosing strategies to minimize blood loss during these procedures. ˜

Acknowledgments
This study is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Sioux Falls VA Health Care System in South Dakota.

The number of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures has significantly increased over the past 2 to 3 decades. As life expectancy in the U.S. increases and medical advances allow patients with preexisting conditions to successfully undergo joint replacements, the demand for these procedures is expected to grow.¹ In 2010, the CDC estimated that 719,000 patients underwent TKA procedures and 332,000 patients underwent THA procedures in the U.S.² Kurtz and colleagues have projected that by 2030 the annual number of TKA procedures will increase to 3.5 million and the number of THA procedures will increase to 572,000.¹

Although becoming more prevalent, these procedures are still associated with considerable intra- and postoperative blood loss that may lead to complications and blood transfusions.³ Previous studies have shown that perioperative anemia and red blood cell transfusions are associated with negative outcomes, including increased health care resource utilization; length of hospitalization; pulmonary, septic, wound, or thromboembolic complications; and mortality.^4,5

In order to prevent excessive blood loss during TKA and THA procedures, antifibrinolytic agents, such as tranexamic acid, have been used. Tranexamic acid is a synthetic form of lysine that binds to the lysine-binding sites on plasminogen and slows the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. This interaction inhibits fibrinolysis and theoretically decreases bleeding.⁶ Because tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic, its mechanism of action has raised concerns that it could increase the risk of clotting complications, such as venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction.⁷

Several published meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown that tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Despite positive results, many study authors have acknowledged limitations in their analyses, such as heterogeneity of study results, small trial size, and varied dosing strategies.^3,7-12 There is no FDA-approved tranexamic acid dosing strategy for orthopedic procedures; therefore, its use in TKA and THA procedures is off label. This lack of guidance results in the medication being used at varied doses, timing of doses, and routes of administration with no clear dosing strategy showing the best outcomes.

Tranexamic acid was first used in TKA and THA surgical procedures at the Sioux Falls VA Health Care System (SFVAHCS) in South Dakota in October 2012. The dose used during these procedures was 1 g IV at first surgical incision and 1 g IV at incision closure. The objective of this study was to determine whether this tranexamic acid dosing strategy utilized at SFVAHCS safely improved outcomes related to blood loss.

Methods

A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent TKA and THA procedures by 4 orthopedic surgeons between January 2010 and August 2015 at SFVAHCS. This study received approval by the local institutional review board and research and development committee in September 2015.

Patients were included in the study if they were aged ≥ 18 years and underwent primary unilateral TKA or THA procedures during the study time frame. Patients were excluded if they underwent bilateral or revision TKA or THA procedures, did not have recorded blood loss measurements during and/or after the procedure, or did not receive tranexamic acid between October 2012 and August 2015 at the standard dosing strategy utilized at SFVAHCS.

Patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and October 2012 and did not receive tranexamic acid were included in the control groups. The treatment groups contained patients who underwent surgery between October 2012 and August 2015 and received tranexamic acid at the standard SFVAHCS dosing strategy. Patients in the control and treatment groups were divided and compared with patients who underwent the same type of surgery.

The primary endpoint of this study was total blood loss, which included intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. Intraoperative blood loss was measured by a suctioning device that the surgical physician’s assistant used to keep the surgical site clear of bodily fluids. The suctioning device collected blood as well as irrigation fluids used throughout the surgical procedure. The volume of irrigation fluids used during the procedure was subtracted from the total volume collected by the suctioning device to estimate the total blood volume lost during surgery. Sponges and other surgical materials that may have collected blood were not included in the intraoperative blood loss calculation. Postoperative blood loss was collected by a drain that was placed in the surgical site prior to incision closure. The drain collected postoperative blood loss until it was removed 1 day after surgery.

The secondary endpoints for the study were changes in hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) from before surgery to after surgery. These changes were calculated by subtracting the lowest measured postoperative Hgb or Hct level within 21 days postsurgery from the closest measured Hgb or Hct level obtained presurgery.

Follow-up appointments were routinely conducted 2 weeks after surgery, so the 21-day time frame would include any laboratory results drawn at these appointments. Other secondary endpoints included the number of patients receiving at least 1 blood transfusion during hospitalization and the number of patients experiencing clotting complications within 30 days of surgery. Postoperative and progress notes were reviewed by a single study investigator in order to record blood transfusions and clotting complications.

All patients who underwent TKA or THA procedures were instructed to stop taking antiplatelet agents 7 days prior to surgery and warfarin 5 days prior to surgery. If patients were determined to be at high risk for thromboembolic complications following warfarin discontinuation, therapeutic doses of low-molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin were used as a bridging therapy pre- and postsurgery. Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily was started the day after surgery in all patients not previously on warfarin therapy prior to surgery to prevent clotting complications. If a patient was on warfarin therapy prior to the procedure but not considered to be at high risk of thromboembolic complications by the surgeon, warfarin was restarted after surgery, and enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily was used until therapeutic international normalized ratio values were obtained. If the patient had ongoing bleeding after the procedure or was determined to be at high risk for bleeding complications, the provider may have delayed anticoagulant use.

Some patients who underwent TKA or THA procedures during the study time frame received periarticular pain injections during surgery. These pain injections included a combination of ropivacaine 200 mg, ketorolac 30 mg, epinephrine 0.5 mg, and clonidine 0.08 mg and were compounded in a sterile mixture with normal saline. Several injections of this mixture were administered into the surgical site to reduce postoperative pain. These periarticular pain injections were first implemented into TKA and THA procedures in August 2012 and were used in patients at the surgeon’s discretion.

Baseline characteristics were analyzed using a chi-square test for categoric variables and an unpaired t test for continuous variables to determine whether any differences were present. Total blood loss, change in Hgb, and change in Hct were analyzed using an unpaired t test. Patients receiving at least 1 blood transfusion during hospitalization and patients experiencing a clotting complication were analyzed using a chi-square test. P values < .05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA), and GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Initially, a total of 443 TKA patients and 111 THA patients were reviewed. Of these patients, 418 TKA patients and 100 THA patients met the inclusion criteria. Due to the retrospective design of this study, not all of the baseline characteristics were equal between groups (Table 1). Most notably, the number of patients who received the periarticular pain injection and the distribution of surgeons performing the procedures were different between groups in both the TKA and THA procedures.

Baseline Hgb levels were not found to be different between groups in either type of procedure; however, the baseline Hct levels of patients undergoing TKA who received tranexamic acid were found to be statistically higher when compared with those who did not receive tranexamic acid. Other baseline characteristics with statistically higher values included average weight and BMI in patients who received tranexamic acid and underwent THA and serum creatinine in patients who did not receive tranexamic acid and underwent TKA.

In the primary analysis (Tables 2 and 3), the mean estimated total blood loss in TKA patients was lower in patients who received tranexamic acid than it was in the control group (339.4 mL vs 457.4 mL, P < .001). Patients who underwent THA receiving tranexamic acid similarly had significantly less total blood loss than that of the control group (419.7 mL vs 585.7 mL, P < .001). Consistent with previous studies, patients undergoing TKA procedures in the treatment group when compared to the control group, respectively, were likely to have more blood loss postoperatively (275.9 mL vs 399.7 mL) than intraoperatively (63.5 mL vs 57.7 mL) regardless of tranexamic acid administration.⁶ On the other hand, patients who had undergone THA were more likely to experience more intraoperative blood loss (281.6 mL in treatment group vs 328.9 mL in control group) than postoperative blood loss (138.1 mL in treatment group vs 256.8 mL in control group) regardless of tranexamic acid administration.

In the secondary analysis, the change between preoperative and postoperative Hgb and Hct had results consistent with the total blood loss results. Patients receiving tranexamic acid in TKA procedures had a lower decrease in Hgb compared with the control group (3.3 mg/dL vs 4.0 mg/dL, P < .001). Similarly, patients undergoing TKA who received tranexamic acid had a smaller decrease in Hct than that of the control group (9.4% vs 11.1%, P < .001). Consistent with the TKA procedure results, patients undergoing THA who received tranexamic acid had a smaller decrease in Hgb (3.6 mg/dL vs 4.7 mg/dL, P < .001) and Hct (10.5% vs 13.0%, P = .0012) than that of the control group.

Patients who did not receive tranexamic acid were more likely to require at least 1 blood transfusion than were patients who received tranexamic acid in TKA (14 patients vs 0 patients, P = .0005) and THA procedures (8 patients vs 2 patients, P = .019). Despite the theoretically increased likelihood of clotting complications with tranexamic acid, no significant differences were observed between the treatment and control groups in either TKA (0 vs 4, P = .065) or THA (1 vs 0, P = .363) procedures.

Discussion

Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty are at risk for significant blood loss with a potential need for postoperative blood transfusions.^6,13 The use of tranexamic acid during these procedures offers a possible solution to decrease blood loss and minimize blood transfusions. This study retrospectively evaluated whether tranexamic acid safely decreased blood loss and the need for blood transfusions at SFVAHCS with the dosing strategy of 1 g IV at first incision and 1 g IV at incision closure.

Patients who received tranexamic acid in TKA and THA procedures had significantly less blood loss than did patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. Patients receiving tranexamic acid also had a significantly lower change from preoperative to postoperative Hgb and Hct levels than did patients who did not receive tranexamic acid in TKA and THA procedures. In addition to decreasing blood loss, the tranexamic acid groups had significantly fewer patients who required blood transfusions than that of the control groups.

This reduction in blood transfusions should be considered clinically significant. Blood transfusions require substantial health care resource utilization and may cause complications in recipients.³ There was no clear association between tranexamic acid and clotting complications in this study, which may suggest that this risk is theoretical. However, larger prospective studies would be needed to further examine this potential risk.

Even though baseline Hct levels were found to be significantly different between the tranexamic acid group and the control group for patients who underwent TKA, medical record documentation indicated that the determination whether postoperative blood transfusions were needed was based primarily on Hgb levels. Baseline Hgb levels were found not to be significantly different between the tranexamic acid and control groups for either TKA or THA procedures. This suggests that at baseline the tranexamic acid and control groups had the same risk of reaching the Hgb threshold where blood transfusions would be required.

There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving the periarticular pain injection of ropivacaine, ketorolac, epinephrine, and clonidine between the groups who received tranexamic acid and those who did not. Originally, this baseline characteristic was theorized to be a major confounder in the primary and secondary analyses because epinephrine is a vasoconstrictor and ketorolac is a reversible antiplatelet agent. However, Vendittoli and colleagues showed that patients receiving these periarticular pain injections during surgery actually had greater total blood loss than did patients who did not receive the injections, although this comparison did not reach statistical significance.¹⁴ The Vendittoli and colleagues results suggest that the pain injections did not confound the primary and secondary analyses by aiding in the process of reducing blood loss in these procedures.

Limitations

There are several limitations for extrapolating the results from this study to the general population. Due to the retrospective study design, there was no way to actively control potentially confounding variables during the TKA and THA procedures. Surgeons and surgery teams likely had slightly different techniques and protocols during and after surgery. Several baseline characteristics were not equal between patients who received tranexamic acid and those who did not. Therefore, it is unknown whether these baseline characteristics affected the results of this study. Postoperative anticoagulant use was not recorded and may have differed between study groups, depending on the patient’s risk of thromboembolic complications; however, the drains that collected blood loss were removed prior to the first dose of enoxaparin, which was administered the day after surgery.

Another limitation is that the method of measuring blood loss during and after the procedure was imprecise. Blood not suctioned through the suctioning device during surgery or not collected in the drain after surgery was not measured and may have increased the total blood loss. Hemoglobin and Hct levels also are sensitive to intravascular volume changes. If a patient required more IV fluids during or after a procedure, the fluids may have lowered the Hgb and/or Hct levels by dilution.

Conclusion

This study suggests that using tranexamic acid at a dose of 1 g IV at first incision and 1 g IV at incision closure safely and effectively reduced blood loss and the need for transfusions in patients undergoing TKA and THA procedures at SFVAHCS. Further prospective studies are needed to compare different tranexamic dosing strategies to minimize blood loss during these procedures. ˜

Acknowledgments
This study is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Sioux Falls VA Health Care System in South Dakota.

The number of patients who undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures has significantly increased over the past 2 to 3 decades. As life expectancy in the U.S. increases and medical advances allow patients with preexisting conditions to successfully undergo joint replacements, the demand for these procedures is expected to grow.¹ In 2010, the CDC estimated that 719,000 patients underwent TKA procedures and 332,000 patients underwent THA procedures in the U.S.² Kurtz and colleagues have projected that by 2030 the annual number of TKA procedures will increase to 3.5 million and the number of THA procedures will increase to 572,000.¹

Although becoming more prevalent, these procedures are still associated with considerable intra- and postoperative blood loss that may lead to complications and blood transfusions.³ Previous studies have shown that perioperative anemia and red blood cell transfusions are associated with negative outcomes, including increased health care resource utilization; length of hospitalization; pulmonary, septic, wound, or thromboembolic complications; and mortality.^4,5

In order to prevent excessive blood loss during TKA and THA procedures, antifibrinolytic agents, such as tranexamic acid, have been used. Tranexamic acid is a synthetic form of lysine that binds to the lysine-binding sites on plasminogen and slows the conversion of plasminogen to plasmin. This interaction inhibits fibrinolysis and theoretically decreases bleeding.⁶ Because tranexamic acid is an antifibrinolytic, its mechanism of action has raised concerns that it could increase the risk of clotting complications, such as venous thromboembolism and myocardial infarction.⁷

Several published meta-analyses and systematic reviews have shown that tranexamic acid reduces blood loss in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. Despite positive results, many study authors have acknowledged limitations in their analyses, such as heterogeneity of study results, small trial size, and varied dosing strategies.^3,7-12 There is no FDA-approved tranexamic acid dosing strategy for orthopedic procedures; therefore, its use in TKA and THA procedures is off label. This lack of guidance results in the medication being used at varied doses, timing of doses, and routes of administration with no clear dosing strategy showing the best outcomes.

Tranexamic acid was first used in TKA and THA surgical procedures at the Sioux Falls VA Health Care System (SFVAHCS) in South Dakota in October 2012. The dose used during these procedures was 1 g IV at first surgical incision and 1 g IV at incision closure. The objective of this study was to determine whether this tranexamic acid dosing strategy utilized at SFVAHCS safely improved outcomes related to blood loss.

Methods

A single-center retrospective chart review was performed on all patients who underwent TKA and THA procedures by 4 orthopedic surgeons between January 2010 and August 2015 at SFVAHCS. This study received approval by the local institutional review board and research and development committee in September 2015.

Patients were included in the study if they were aged ≥ 18 years and underwent primary unilateral TKA or THA procedures during the study time frame. Patients were excluded if they underwent bilateral or revision TKA or THA procedures, did not have recorded blood loss measurements during and/or after the procedure, or did not receive tranexamic acid between October 2012 and August 2015 at the standard dosing strategy utilized at SFVAHCS.

Patients who underwent surgery between January 2010 and October 2012 and did not receive tranexamic acid were included in the control groups. The treatment groups contained patients who underwent surgery between October 2012 and August 2015 and received tranexamic acid at the standard SFVAHCS dosing strategy. Patients in the control and treatment groups were divided and compared with patients who underwent the same type of surgery.

The primary endpoint of this study was total blood loss, which included intraoperative and postoperative blood loss. Intraoperative blood loss was measured by a suctioning device that the surgical physician’s assistant used to keep the surgical site clear of bodily fluids. The suctioning device collected blood as well as irrigation fluids used throughout the surgical procedure. The volume of irrigation fluids used during the procedure was subtracted from the total volume collected by the suctioning device to estimate the total blood volume lost during surgery. Sponges and other surgical materials that may have collected blood were not included in the intraoperative blood loss calculation. Postoperative blood loss was collected by a drain that was placed in the surgical site prior to incision closure. The drain collected postoperative blood loss until it was removed 1 day after surgery.

The secondary endpoints for the study were changes in hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) from before surgery to after surgery. These changes were calculated by subtracting the lowest measured postoperative Hgb or Hct level within 21 days postsurgery from the closest measured Hgb or Hct level obtained presurgery.

Follow-up appointments were routinely conducted 2 weeks after surgery, so the 21-day time frame would include any laboratory results drawn at these appointments. Other secondary endpoints included the number of patients receiving at least 1 blood transfusion during hospitalization and the number of patients experiencing clotting complications within 30 days of surgery. Postoperative and progress notes were reviewed by a single study investigator in order to record blood transfusions and clotting complications.

All patients who underwent TKA or THA procedures were instructed to stop taking antiplatelet agents 7 days prior to surgery and warfarin 5 days prior to surgery. If patients were determined to be at high risk for thromboembolic complications following warfarin discontinuation, therapeutic doses of low-molecular weight heparin or unfractionated heparin were used as a bridging therapy pre- and postsurgery. Enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily was started the day after surgery in all patients not previously on warfarin therapy prior to surgery to prevent clotting complications. If a patient was on warfarin therapy prior to the procedure but not considered to be at high risk of thromboembolic complications by the surgeon, warfarin was restarted after surgery, and enoxaparin 30 mg twice daily was used until therapeutic international normalized ratio values were obtained. If the patient had ongoing bleeding after the procedure or was determined to be at high risk for bleeding complications, the provider may have delayed anticoagulant use.

Some patients who underwent TKA or THA procedures during the study time frame received periarticular pain injections during surgery. These pain injections included a combination of ropivacaine 200 mg, ketorolac 30 mg, epinephrine 0.5 mg, and clonidine 0.08 mg and were compounded in a sterile mixture with normal saline. Several injections of this mixture were administered into the surgical site to reduce postoperative pain. These periarticular pain injections were first implemented into TKA and THA procedures in August 2012 and were used in patients at the surgeon’s discretion.

Baseline characteristics were analyzed using a chi-square test for categoric variables and an unpaired t test for continuous variables to determine whether any differences were present. Total blood loss, change in Hgb, and change in Hct were analyzed using an unpaired t test. Patients receiving at least 1 blood transfusion during hospitalization and patients experiencing a clotting complication were analyzed using a chi-square test. P values < .05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. Descriptive statistics were calculated using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA), and GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Initially, a total of 443 TKA patients and 111 THA patients were reviewed. Of these patients, 418 TKA patients and 100 THA patients met the inclusion criteria. Due to the retrospective design of this study, not all of the baseline characteristics were equal between groups (Table 1). Most notably, the number of patients who received the periarticular pain injection and the distribution of surgeons performing the procedures were different between groups in both the TKA and THA procedures.

Baseline Hgb levels were not found to be different between groups in either type of procedure; however, the baseline Hct levels of patients undergoing TKA who received tranexamic acid were found to be statistically higher when compared with those who did not receive tranexamic acid. Other baseline characteristics with statistically higher values included average weight and BMI in patients who received tranexamic acid and underwent THA and serum creatinine in patients who did not receive tranexamic acid and underwent TKA.

In the primary analysis (Tables 2 and 3), the mean estimated total blood loss in TKA patients was lower in patients who received tranexamic acid than it was in the control group (339.4 mL vs 457.4 mL, P < .001). Patients who underwent THA receiving tranexamic acid similarly had significantly less total blood loss than that of the control group (419.7 mL vs 585.7 mL, P < .001). Consistent with previous studies, patients undergoing TKA procedures in the treatment group when compared to the control group, respectively, were likely to have more blood loss postoperatively (275.9 mL vs 399.7 mL) than intraoperatively (63.5 mL vs 57.7 mL) regardless of tranexamic acid administration.⁶ On the other hand, patients who had undergone THA were more likely to experience more intraoperative blood loss (281.6 mL in treatment group vs 328.9 mL in control group) than postoperative blood loss (138.1 mL in treatment group vs 256.8 mL in control group) regardless of tranexamic acid administration.

In the secondary analysis, the change between preoperative and postoperative Hgb and Hct had results consistent with the total blood loss results. Patients receiving tranexamic acid in TKA procedures had a lower decrease in Hgb compared with the control group (3.3 mg/dL vs 4.0 mg/dL, P < .001). Similarly, patients undergoing TKA who received tranexamic acid had a smaller decrease in Hct than that of the control group (9.4% vs 11.1%, P < .001). Consistent with the TKA procedure results, patients undergoing THA who received tranexamic acid had a smaller decrease in Hgb (3.6 mg/dL vs 4.7 mg/dL, P < .001) and Hct (10.5% vs 13.0%, P = .0012) than that of the control group.

Patients who did not receive tranexamic acid were more likely to require at least 1 blood transfusion than were patients who received tranexamic acid in TKA (14 patients vs 0 patients, P = .0005) and THA procedures (8 patients vs 2 patients, P = .019). Despite the theoretically increased likelihood of clotting complications with tranexamic acid, no significant differences were observed between the treatment and control groups in either TKA (0 vs 4, P = .065) or THA (1 vs 0, P = .363) procedures.

Discussion

Patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty are at risk for significant blood loss with a potential need for postoperative blood transfusions.^6,13 The use of tranexamic acid during these procedures offers a possible solution to decrease blood loss and minimize blood transfusions. This study retrospectively evaluated whether tranexamic acid safely decreased blood loss and the need for blood transfusions at SFVAHCS with the dosing strategy of 1 g IV at first incision and 1 g IV at incision closure.

Patients who received tranexamic acid in TKA and THA procedures had significantly less blood loss than did patients who did not receive tranexamic acid. Patients receiving tranexamic acid also had a significantly lower change from preoperative to postoperative Hgb and Hct levels than did patients who did not receive tranexamic acid in TKA and THA procedures. In addition to decreasing blood loss, the tranexamic acid groups had significantly fewer patients who required blood transfusions than that of the control groups.

This reduction in blood transfusions should be considered clinically significant. Blood transfusions require substantial health care resource utilization and may cause complications in recipients.³ There was no clear association between tranexamic acid and clotting complications in this study, which may suggest that this risk is theoretical. However, larger prospective studies would be needed to further examine this potential risk.

Even though baseline Hct levels were found to be significantly different between the tranexamic acid group and the control group for patients who underwent TKA, medical record documentation indicated that the determination whether postoperative blood transfusions were needed was based primarily on Hgb levels. Baseline Hgb levels were found not to be significantly different between the tranexamic acid and control groups for either TKA or THA procedures. This suggests that at baseline the tranexamic acid and control groups had the same risk of reaching the Hgb threshold where blood transfusions would be required.

There was a significant difference in the proportion of patients receiving the periarticular pain injection of ropivacaine, ketorolac, epinephrine, and clonidine between the groups who received tranexamic acid and those who did not. Originally, this baseline characteristic was theorized to be a major confounder in the primary and secondary analyses because epinephrine is a vasoconstrictor and ketorolac is a reversible antiplatelet agent. However, Vendittoli and colleagues showed that patients receiving these periarticular pain injections during surgery actually had greater total blood loss than did patients who did not receive the injections, although this comparison did not reach statistical significance.¹⁴ The Vendittoli and colleagues results suggest that the pain injections did not confound the primary and secondary analyses by aiding in the process of reducing blood loss in these procedures.

Limitations

There are several limitations for extrapolating the results from this study to the general population. Due to the retrospective study design, there was no way to actively control potentially confounding variables during the TKA and THA procedures. Surgeons and surgery teams likely had slightly different techniques and protocols during and after surgery. Several baseline characteristics were not equal between patients who received tranexamic acid and those who did not. Therefore, it is unknown whether these baseline characteristics affected the results of this study. Postoperative anticoagulant use was not recorded and may have differed between study groups, depending on the patient’s risk of thromboembolic complications; however, the drains that collected blood loss were removed prior to the first dose of enoxaparin, which was administered the day after surgery.

Another limitation is that the method of measuring blood loss during and after the procedure was imprecise. Blood not suctioned through the suctioning device during surgery or not collected in the drain after surgery was not measured and may have increased the total blood loss. Hemoglobin and Hct levels also are sensitive to intravascular volume changes. If a patient required more IV fluids during or after a procedure, the fluids may have lowered the Hgb and/or Hct levels by dilution.

Conclusion

This study suggests that using tranexamic acid at a dose of 1 g IV at first incision and 1 g IV at incision closure safely and effectively reduced blood loss and the need for transfusions in patients undergoing TKA and THA procedures at SFVAHCS. Further prospective studies are needed to compare different tranexamic dosing strategies to minimize blood loss during these procedures. ˜

Acknowledgments
This study is the result of work supported with resources and the use of facilities at the Sioux Falls VA Health Care System in South Dakota.

Practicing at the top of your license, billing and reimbursement, recruiting and orientation – Those were some of the hot topics discussed by more than 50 attendees of HM17’s Special Interest Forum for nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).

“Every year, we are seeing more and more HM groups integrating NPs and PAs into their practice,” said forum moderator Emilie Thornhill, PA-C, a certified PA, who works for Oschner Health in New Orleans, La.

Ms. Thornhill emphasized that a common issue among attendees is restrictive HM policies in dictating the scope of practice for NP/PAs in hospitalist groups.

“That seems to be the thing that is holding us back the most,” she said. “SHM is really going to be the home for these individuals to find the resources they need to address these issues.”

Practicing at the top of your license, billing and reimbursement, recruiting and orientation – Those were some of the hot topics discussed by more than 50 attendees of HM17’s Special Interest Forum for nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).

“Every year, we are seeing more and more HM groups integrating NPs and PAs into their practice,” said forum moderator Emilie Thornhill, PA-C, a certified PA, who works for Oschner Health in New Orleans, La.

Ms. Thornhill emphasized that a common issue among attendees is restrictive HM policies in dictating the scope of practice for NP/PAs in hospitalist groups.

“That seems to be the thing that is holding us back the most,” she said. “SHM is really going to be the home for these individuals to find the resources they need to address these issues.”

Practicing at the top of your license, billing and reimbursement, recruiting and orientation – Those were some of the hot topics discussed by more than 50 attendees of HM17’s Special Interest Forum for nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs).

“Every year, we are seeing more and more HM groups integrating NPs and PAs into their practice,” said forum moderator Emilie Thornhill, PA-C, a certified PA, who works for Oschner Health in New Orleans, La.

Ms. Thornhill emphasized that a common issue among attendees is restrictive HM policies in dictating the scope of practice for NP/PAs in hospitalist groups.

“That seems to be the thing that is holding us back the most,” she said. “SHM is really going to be the home for these individuals to find the resources they need to address these issues.”

Coping with disjointed administrative goals, demonstrating value to hospital leadership, and strengthening support networks for one another were hot-button topics during the Special Interest Group for Community Hospitalists at this year’s HM17.

A mix of hospitalists from rural, urban, and suburban facilities with an average 200-500 beds joined in the discussion, moderated by Stephen Behnke, MD, an internist and president of MedOne in Columbus, Ohio, and Jason Robertson, MD, an internist with HealthPartners in Bloomington, Minn.

Burnout was seen by several in the crowd of about two dozen physicians as being related in part to poor staffing and scheduling decisions at the administrative level, and not allocating clerical work to other staff, often forcing hospitalists to perform tasks not at the top of their license. One solution offered was to amortize the cost of physicians doing paperwork according to their salaries, and to bring those numbers to the attention of hospital leadership.

The group called on the Society of Hospital Medicine to create and disseminate evidence-based resources to help demonstrate their value to hospital administration. Many in the group expressed interest in learning how to communicate their value effectively to their respective C-suites to underscore the essential nature HM has to the core business. In an interview directly after the session, Dr. Behnke explained that hospital leaders often underfund HM programs, only to find that the decision ends up costing them more in the long run.

Lots of upset was vented by session attendees over patient discharge protocols that often resulted in higher lengths of stay or increased readmissions, which then reflected poorly on the hospitalist. The group agreed that since there was no one-size-fits-all approach to this, it would be helpful to start a listserv of community hospitalists in the SHM that was organized by hospital size, location, and types of staffing, so it would be easier to find solutions by connecting with others with similar concerns.

Many in the group also shared how their respective facilities promoted wellness through togetherness activities: staff retreats, movie nights, book clubs, group family outings, and forming alliances with hospitalists at other local hospitals. The general consensus was that this helped improve staff morale.

Coping with disjointed administrative goals, demonstrating value to hospital leadership, and strengthening support networks for one another were hot-button topics during the Special Interest Group for Community Hospitalists at this year’s HM17.

A mix of hospitalists from rural, urban, and suburban facilities with an average 200-500 beds joined in the discussion, moderated by Stephen Behnke, MD, an internist and president of MedOne in Columbus, Ohio, and Jason Robertson, MD, an internist with HealthPartners in Bloomington, Minn.

Burnout was seen by several in the crowd of about two dozen physicians as being related in part to poor staffing and scheduling decisions at the administrative level, and not allocating clerical work to other staff, often forcing hospitalists to perform tasks not at the top of their license. One solution offered was to amortize the cost of physicians doing paperwork according to their salaries, and to bring those numbers to the attention of hospital leadership.

The group called on the Society of Hospital Medicine to create and disseminate evidence-based resources to help demonstrate their value to hospital administration. Many in the group expressed interest in learning how to communicate their value effectively to their respective C-suites to underscore the essential nature HM has to the core business. In an interview directly after the session, Dr. Behnke explained that hospital leaders often underfund HM programs, only to find that the decision ends up costing them more in the long run.

Lots of upset was vented by session attendees over patient discharge protocols that often resulted in higher lengths of stay or increased readmissions, which then reflected poorly on the hospitalist. The group agreed that since there was no one-size-fits-all approach to this, it would be helpful to start a listserv of community hospitalists in the SHM that was organized by hospital size, location, and types of staffing, so it would be easier to find solutions by connecting with others with similar concerns.

Many in the group also shared how their respective facilities promoted wellness through togetherness activities: staff retreats, movie nights, book clubs, group family outings, and forming alliances with hospitalists at other local hospitals. The general consensus was that this helped improve staff morale.

Coping with disjointed administrative goals, demonstrating value to hospital leadership, and strengthening support networks for one another were hot-button topics during the Special Interest Group for Community Hospitalists at this year’s HM17.

A mix of hospitalists from rural, urban, and suburban facilities with an average 200-500 beds joined in the discussion, moderated by Stephen Behnke, MD, an internist and president of MedOne in Columbus, Ohio, and Jason Robertson, MD, an internist with HealthPartners in Bloomington, Minn.

Burnout was seen by several in the crowd of about two dozen physicians as being related in part to poor staffing and scheduling decisions at the administrative level, and not allocating clerical work to other staff, often forcing hospitalists to perform tasks not at the top of their license. One solution offered was to amortize the cost of physicians doing paperwork according to their salaries, and to bring those numbers to the attention of hospital leadership.

The group called on the Society of Hospital Medicine to create and disseminate evidence-based resources to help demonstrate their value to hospital administration. Many in the group expressed interest in learning how to communicate their value effectively to their respective C-suites to underscore the essential nature HM has to the core business. In an interview directly after the session, Dr. Behnke explained that hospital leaders often underfund HM programs, only to find that the decision ends up costing them more in the long run.

Lots of upset was vented by session attendees over patient discharge protocols that often resulted in higher lengths of stay or increased readmissions, which then reflected poorly on the hospitalist. The group agreed that since there was no one-size-fits-all approach to this, it would be helpful to start a listserv of community hospitalists in the SHM that was organized by hospital size, location, and types of staffing, so it would be easier to find solutions by connecting with others with similar concerns.

Many in the group also shared how their respective facilities promoted wellness through togetherness activities: staff retreats, movie nights, book clubs, group family outings, and forming alliances with hospitalists at other local hospitals. The general consensus was that this helped improve staff morale.

Lentigo maligna (LM) and LM melanoma (LMM) represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their heterogeneous nature and location on cosmetically sensitive areas. Newer ancillary technologies such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have helped improve diagnosis and management of these challenging lesions.^1,2

Reflectance confocal microscopy is a noninvasive laser system that provides real-time imaging of the epidermis and dermis with cellular resolution and improves diagnostic accuracy of melanocytic lesions.^2,3 Normal melanocytes appear as round bright structures on RCM that are similar in size to surrounding keratinocytes located in the basal layer and regularly distributed around the dermal papillae (junctional nevi) or form regular dense nests in the dermis (intradermal nevi).^4,5 In LM/LMM, there may be widespread infiltration of atypical melanocytes invading hair follicles; large, round, pagetoid melanocytes (larger than surrounding keratinocytes); sheets of large atypical cells at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ); loss of contour in the dermal papillae; and atypical melanocytes invading the dermal papillae.² Indeed, RCM has good correlation with the degree of histologic atypia and is useful to distinguish between benign nevi, atypical nevi, and melanoma.⁶ By combining lateral mosaics with vertical stacks, RCM allows 3-dimensional approximation of tumor margins and monitoring of nonsurgical therapies.^7,8 The advent of handheld RCM (HRCM) has allowed assessment of large lesions as well as those presenting in difficult locations.⁹ Furthermore, the generation of videomosaics overcomes the limited field of view of traditional RCM and allows for accurate assessment of large lesions.¹⁰

Traditional and handheld RCM have been used to diagnose and map primary LM.^1,2,11 Guitera et al² developed an algorithm using traditional RCM to distinguish benign facial macules and LM. In their training set, they found that when their score resulted in 2 or more points, the sensitivity and specificity to diagnose LM was 85% and 76%, respectively, with an odds ratio of 18.6 for LM. They later applied the algorithm in a test set of 44 benign facial macules and 29 LM and obtained an odds ratio of 60.7 for LM, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 93% and 82%, respectively.² This algorithm also was tested by Menge et al11 using the HRCM. They found 100% sensitivity and 71% specificity for LM when evaluating 63 equivocal facial lesions. Although these results suggest that RCM can accurately distinguish LM from benign lesions in the primary setting, few reports have studied the impact of HRCM in the recurrent setting and its impact in monitoring treatment of LM.^12,13

Herein, we present 5 cases in which HRCM was used to manage complex facial LM/LMM, highlighting its versatility and potential for use in the clinical setting (eTable).

Case Series

Following institutional review board approval, cases of facial LM/LMM presenting for assessment and treatment from January 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Initially, the clinical margins of the lesions were determined using Wood lamp and/or dermoscopy. Using HRCM, vertical stacks were taken at the 12-, 3-, 6-, and 9-o'clock positions, and videos were captured along the peripheral margins at the DEJ. To create videomosaics, HRCM video frames were extracted and later stitched using a computer algorithm written in a fourth-generation programming language based on prior studies.^10,14 An example HRCM video that was captured and turned into a videomosaic accompanies this article online (http://bit.ly/2oDYS6k). Additional stacks were taken in suspicious areas. We considered an area positive for LM under HRCM when the LM score developed by Guitera et al² was 2 or more. The algorithm scoring includes 2 major criteria--nonedged papillae and round large pagetoid cells--which score 2 points, and 4 minor criteria, including 3 positive criteria--atypical cells at the DEJ, follicular invasion, nucleated cells in the papillae--which each score 1 point, and 1 negative criterion--broadened honeycomb pattern--which scores -1 point.²

RELATED VIDEO: RCM Videomosaic of Melanoma In Situ

Patient 1

An 82-year-old woman was referred to us for management of an LMM on the left side of the forehead (Figure 1A). Handheld RCM from the biopsy site showed large atypical cells in the epidermis, DEJ, and papillary dermis. Superiorly, HRCM showed large dendritic processes but did not reveal LM features in 3 additional clinically worrisome areas. Biopsies showed LMM at the prior biopsy site, LM superiorly, and actinic keratosis in the remaining 3 areas, supporting the HRCM findings. Due to upstaging, the patient was referred for head and neck surgery. To aid in resection, HRCM was performed intraoperatively in a multidisciplinary approach (Figure 1B). Due to the large size of the lesion, surgical margins were taken right outside the HRCM border. Pathology showed LMM extending focally into the margins that were reexcised, achieving clearance.

Patient 2

An 88-year-old woman presented with a slightly pigmented, 2.5×2.3-cm LMM on the left cheek. Because of her age and comorbidities (eg, osteoporosis, deep vein thrombosis in both lower legs requiring anticoagulation therapy, presence of an inferior vena cava filter, bilateral lymphedema of the legs, irritable bowel syndrome, hyperparathyroidism), she was treated with imiquimod cream 5% achieving partial response. The lesion was subsequently excised showing LMM extending to the margins. Not wanting to undergo further surgery, she opted for radiation therapy. Handheld RCM was performed to guide the radiation field, showing pagetoid cells within 1 cm of the scar and clear margins beyond 2 cm. She underwent radiation therapy followed by treatment with imiquimod. On 6-month follow-up, no clinical lesion was apparent, but HRCM showed atypical cells. Biopsies revealed an atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation, but due to patient's comorbidities, close observation was decided.

Patient 3

A 78-year-old man presented with an LMM on the right preauricular area. Handheld RCM demonstrated pleomorphic pagetoid cells along and beyond the clinical margins. Wide excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy was planned, and to aid surgery a confocal map was created (Figure 2). Margins were clear at 1 cm, except inferiorly where they extended to 1.5 cm. Using this preoperative HRCM map, all intraoperative sections were clear. Final pathology confirmed clear margins throughout.

Patient 4

A 62-year-old man presented with hyperpigmentation and bleeding on the left cheek where an LMM was previously removed 8 times over 18 years. Handheld RCM showed pleomorphic cells along the graft border and interestingly within the graft. Ten biopsies were taken, 8 at sites with confocal features that were worrisome for LM (Figures 3A and 3B) and 2 at clinically suspicious sites. The former revealed melanomas (2 that were invasive to 0.3 mm), and the latter revealed solar lentigines. The patient underwent staged excision guided by HRCM (Figure 3C), achieving clear histologic margins except for a focus in the helix. This area was RCM positive but was intentionally not resected due to reconstructive difficulties; imiquimod was indicated in this area.

Patient 5

An 85-year-old woman with 6 prior melanomas over 15 years presented with ill-defined light brown patches on the left cheek at the site where an LM was previously excised 15 years prior. Biopsies showed LM, and due to the patient's age, health, and personal preference to avoid extensive surgery, treatment with imiquimod cream 5% was decided. Over a period of 6 to 12 months, she developed multiple erythematous macules with 2 faintly pigmented areas. Handheld RCM demonstrated atypical cells within the papillae in previously biopsied sites that were rebiopsied, revealing LMM (Breslow depth, 0.2 mm). Staged excision achieved clear margins, but after 8 months HRCM showed LM features. Histology confirmed the diagnosis and imiquimod was reapplied.

Comment

Diagnosis and choice of treatment modality for cases of facial LM is a challenge, and there are a number of factors that may create even more of a clinical dilemma. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for LM/LMM, and better results are achieved when using histologically controlled surgical procedures such as Mohs micrographic surgery, staged excision, or the "spaghetti technique."^15-17 However, advanced patient age, multiple comorbidities (eg, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, other conditions requiring anticoagulation therapy), large lesion size in functionally or aesthetically sensitive areas, and indiscriminate borders on photodamaged skin may make surgical excision complicated or not feasible. Additionally, prior treatments to the affected area may further obscure clinical borders, complicating the diagnosis of recurrence/persistence when observed with the naked eye, dermoscopy, or Wood lamp. Because RCM can detect small amounts of melanin and has cellular resolution, it has been suggested as a great diagnostic tool to be combined with dermoscopy when evaluating lightly pigmented/amelanotic facial lesions arising on sun-damaged skin.^18,19 In this case series, we highlighted these difficulties and showed how HRCM can be useful in a variety of scenarios, both pretreatment and posttreatment in complex LM/LMM cases.

Pretreatment Evaluation

Blind mapping biopsies of LM are prone to sample bias and depend greatly on biopsy technique; however, HRCM can guide mapping biopsies by detecting features of LM in vivo with high sensitivity.¹¹ Due to the cosmetically sensitive nature of the lesions, many physicians are discouraged to do multiple mapping biopsies, making it difficult to assess the breadth of the lesion and occult invasion. Multiple studies have shown that occult invasion was not apparent until complete lesion excision was done.^15,20,21 Agarwal-Antal et al²⁰ reported 92 cases of LM, of which 16% (15/92) had unsuspected invasion on final excisional pathology. A long-standing disadvantage of treating LM with nonsurgical modalities has been the inability to detect occult invasion or multifocal invasion within the lesion. As described in patients 1, 4, and 5 in the current case series, utilizing real-time video imaging of the DEJ at the margins and within the lesion has allowed for the detection of deep atypical melanocytes suspicious for perifollicular infiltration and invasion. Knowing the depth of invasion before treatment is essential for not only counseling the patient about disease risk but also for choosing an appropriate treatment modality. Therefore, prospective studies evaluating the performance of RCM to identify invasion are crucial to improve sampling error and avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Surgical Treatment

Although surgery is the first-line treatment option for facial LM, it is not without associated morbidity, and LM is known to have histological subclinical extension, which makes margin assessment difficult. Wide surgical margins on the face are not always possible and become further complicated when trying to maintain adequate functional and cosmetic outcomes. Additionally, the margin for surgical clearance may not be straightforward for facial lesions. Hazan et al¹⁵ showed the mean total surgical margins required for excision of LM and LMM was 7.1 and 10.3 mm, respectively; of the 91 tumors initially diagnosed as LM on biopsy, 16% (15/91) had unsuspected invasion. Guitera et al² reported that the presence of atypical cells within the dermal papillae might be a sign of invasion, which occasionally is not detected histologically due to sampling bias. Handheld RCM offers the advantage of a rapid real-time assessment in areas that may not have been amenable to previous iterations of the device, and it also provides a larger field of view that would be time consuming if performed using conventional RCM. Compared to prior RCM devices that were not handheld, the use of the HRCM does not need to attach a ring to the skin and is less bulky, permitting its use at the bedside of the patient or even intraoperatively.13 In our experience, HRCM has helped to better characterize subclinical spread of LM during the initial consultation and better counsel patients about the extent of the lesion. Handheld RCM also has been used to guide the spaghetti technique in patients with LM/LMM with good correlation between HRCM and histology.²² In our case series, HRCM was used in complex LM/LMM to delineate surgical margins, though in some cases the histologic margins were too close or affected, suggesting HRCM underestimation. Lentigo maligna margin assessment with RCM uses an algorithm that evaluates confocal features in the center of the lesion.^1,2 Therefore, further studies using HRCM should evaluate minor confocal features in the margins as potential markers of positivity to accurately delineate surgical margins.

Nonsurgical Treatment Options

For patients unable or unwilling to pursue surgical treatment, therapies such as imiquimod or radiation have been suggested.^23,24 However, the lack of histological confirmation and possibility for invasive spread has limited these modalities. Lentigo malignas treated with radiation have a 5% recurrence rate, with a median follow-up time of 3 years.²³ Recurrence often can be difficult to detect clinically, as it may manifest as an amelanotic lesion, or postradiation changes can hinder detection. Handheld RCM allows for a cellular-level observation of the irradiated field and can identify radiation-induced changes in LM lesions, including superficial necrosis, apoptotic cells, dilated vessels, and increased inflammatory cells.²⁵ Handheld RCM has previously been used to assess LM treated with radiation and, as in patient 2, can help define the radiation field and detect treatment failure or recurrence.^12,25

Similarly, as described in patient 5, HRCM was utilized to monitor treatment with imiquimod. Many reports use imiquimod for treatment of LM, but application and response vary greatly. Reflectance confocal microscopy has been shown to be useful in monitoring LM treated with imiquimod,⁸ which is important because clinical findings such as inflammation and erythema do not correlate well with response to therapy. Thus, RCM is an appealing noninvasive modality to monitor response to treatment and assess the need for longer treatment duration. Moreover, similar to postradiation changes, treatment with imiquimod may cause an alteration of the clinically apparent pigment. Therefore, it is difficult to assess treatment success by clinical inspection alone. The use of RCM before, during, and after treatment provides a longitudinal assessment of the lesion and has augmented dermatologists' ability to determine treatment success or failure; however, prospective studies evaluating the usefulness of HRCM in the recurrent setting are needed to validate these results.

Limitations

Limitations of this technology include the time needed to image large areas; technology cost; and associated learning curve, which may take from 6 months to 1 year based on our experience. Others have reported the training required for accurate RCM interpretation to be less than that of dermoscopy.²⁶ It has been shown that key RCM diagnostic criteria for lesions including melanoma and basal cell carcinoma are reproducibly recognized among RCM users and that diagnostic accuracy increases with experience.²⁷ These limitations can be overcome with advances in videomosaicing that may streamline the imaging as well as an eventual decrease in cost with greater user adoption and the development of training platforms that enable a faster learning of RCM.²⁸

Conclusion

The use of HRCM can help in the diagnosis and management of facial LMs. Handheld RCM provides longitudinal assessment of LM/LMM that may help determine treatment success or failure and has proven to be useful in detecting the presence of recurrence/persistence in cases that were clinically poorly evident. Moreover, HRCM is a notable ancillary tool, as it can be performed at the bedside of the patient or even intraoperatively and provides a faster approach than conventional RCM in cases where large areas need to be mapped.

In summary, HRCM may eventually be a useful screening tool to guide scouting biopsies to diagnose de novo LM; guide surgical and nonsurgical therapies; and evaluate the presence of recurrence/persistence, especially in large, complex, amelanotic or poorly pigmented lesions. A more standardized use of HRCM in mapping surgical and nonsurgical approaches needs to be evaluated in further studies to provide a fast and reliable complement to histology in such complex cases; therefore, larger studies need to be performed to validate this technique in such complex cases.

Lentigo maligna (LM) and LM melanoma (LMM) represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their heterogeneous nature and location on cosmetically sensitive areas. Newer ancillary technologies such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have helped improve diagnosis and management of these challenging lesions.^1,2

Reflectance confocal microscopy is a noninvasive laser system that provides real-time imaging of the epidermis and dermis with cellular resolution and improves diagnostic accuracy of melanocytic lesions.^2,3 Normal melanocytes appear as round bright structures on RCM that are similar in size to surrounding keratinocytes located in the basal layer and regularly distributed around the dermal papillae (junctional nevi) or form regular dense nests in the dermis (intradermal nevi).^4,5 In LM/LMM, there may be widespread infiltration of atypical melanocytes invading hair follicles; large, round, pagetoid melanocytes (larger than surrounding keratinocytes); sheets of large atypical cells at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ); loss of contour in the dermal papillae; and atypical melanocytes invading the dermal papillae.² Indeed, RCM has good correlation with the degree of histologic atypia and is useful to distinguish between benign nevi, atypical nevi, and melanoma.⁶ By combining lateral mosaics with vertical stacks, RCM allows 3-dimensional approximation of tumor margins and monitoring of nonsurgical therapies.^7,8 The advent of handheld RCM (HRCM) has allowed assessment of large lesions as well as those presenting in difficult locations.⁹ Furthermore, the generation of videomosaics overcomes the limited field of view of traditional RCM and allows for accurate assessment of large lesions.¹⁰

Traditional and handheld RCM have been used to diagnose and map primary LM.^1,2,11 Guitera et al² developed an algorithm using traditional RCM to distinguish benign facial macules and LM. In their training set, they found that when their score resulted in 2 or more points, the sensitivity and specificity to diagnose LM was 85% and 76%, respectively, with an odds ratio of 18.6 for LM. They later applied the algorithm in a test set of 44 benign facial macules and 29 LM and obtained an odds ratio of 60.7 for LM, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 93% and 82%, respectively.² This algorithm also was tested by Menge et al11 using the HRCM. They found 100% sensitivity and 71% specificity for LM when evaluating 63 equivocal facial lesions. Although these results suggest that RCM can accurately distinguish LM from benign lesions in the primary setting, few reports have studied the impact of HRCM in the recurrent setting and its impact in monitoring treatment of LM.^12,13

Herein, we present 5 cases in which HRCM was used to manage complex facial LM/LMM, highlighting its versatility and potential for use in the clinical setting (eTable).

Case Series

Following institutional review board approval, cases of facial LM/LMM presenting for assessment and treatment from January 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Initially, the clinical margins of the lesions were determined using Wood lamp and/or dermoscopy. Using HRCM, vertical stacks were taken at the 12-, 3-, 6-, and 9-o'clock positions, and videos were captured along the peripheral margins at the DEJ. To create videomosaics, HRCM video frames were extracted and later stitched using a computer algorithm written in a fourth-generation programming language based on prior studies.^10,14 An example HRCM video that was captured and turned into a videomosaic accompanies this article online (http://bit.ly/2oDYS6k). Additional stacks were taken in suspicious areas. We considered an area positive for LM under HRCM when the LM score developed by Guitera et al² was 2 or more. The algorithm scoring includes 2 major criteria--nonedged papillae and round large pagetoid cells--which score 2 points, and 4 minor criteria, including 3 positive criteria--atypical cells at the DEJ, follicular invasion, nucleated cells in the papillae--which each score 1 point, and 1 negative criterion--broadened honeycomb pattern--which scores -1 point.²

RELATED VIDEO: RCM Videomosaic of Melanoma In Situ

Patient 1

An 82-year-old woman was referred to us for management of an LMM on the left side of the forehead (Figure 1A). Handheld RCM from the biopsy site showed large atypical cells in the epidermis, DEJ, and papillary dermis. Superiorly, HRCM showed large dendritic processes but did not reveal LM features in 3 additional clinically worrisome areas. Biopsies showed LMM at the prior biopsy site, LM superiorly, and actinic keratosis in the remaining 3 areas, supporting the HRCM findings. Due to upstaging, the patient was referred for head and neck surgery. To aid in resection, HRCM was performed intraoperatively in a multidisciplinary approach (Figure 1B). Due to the large size of the lesion, surgical margins were taken right outside the HRCM border. Pathology showed LMM extending focally into the margins that were reexcised, achieving clearance.

Patient 2

An 88-year-old woman presented with a slightly pigmented, 2.5×2.3-cm LMM on the left cheek. Because of her age and comorbidities (eg, osteoporosis, deep vein thrombosis in both lower legs requiring anticoagulation therapy, presence of an inferior vena cava filter, bilateral lymphedema of the legs, irritable bowel syndrome, hyperparathyroidism), she was treated with imiquimod cream 5% achieving partial response. The lesion was subsequently excised showing LMM extending to the margins. Not wanting to undergo further surgery, she opted for radiation therapy. Handheld RCM was performed to guide the radiation field, showing pagetoid cells within 1 cm of the scar and clear margins beyond 2 cm. She underwent radiation therapy followed by treatment with imiquimod. On 6-month follow-up, no clinical lesion was apparent, but HRCM showed atypical cells. Biopsies revealed an atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation, but due to patient's comorbidities, close observation was decided.

Patient 3

A 78-year-old man presented with an LMM on the right preauricular area. Handheld RCM demonstrated pleomorphic pagetoid cells along and beyond the clinical margins. Wide excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy was planned, and to aid surgery a confocal map was created (Figure 2). Margins were clear at 1 cm, except inferiorly where they extended to 1.5 cm. Using this preoperative HRCM map, all intraoperative sections were clear. Final pathology confirmed clear margins throughout.

Patient 4

A 62-year-old man presented with hyperpigmentation and bleeding on the left cheek where an LMM was previously removed 8 times over 18 years. Handheld RCM showed pleomorphic cells along the graft border and interestingly within the graft. Ten biopsies were taken, 8 at sites with confocal features that were worrisome for LM (Figures 3A and 3B) and 2 at clinically suspicious sites. The former revealed melanomas (2 that were invasive to 0.3 mm), and the latter revealed solar lentigines. The patient underwent staged excision guided by HRCM (Figure 3C), achieving clear histologic margins except for a focus in the helix. This area was RCM positive but was intentionally not resected due to reconstructive difficulties; imiquimod was indicated in this area.

Patient 5

An 85-year-old woman with 6 prior melanomas over 15 years presented with ill-defined light brown patches on the left cheek at the site where an LM was previously excised 15 years prior. Biopsies showed LM, and due to the patient's age, health, and personal preference to avoid extensive surgery, treatment with imiquimod cream 5% was decided. Over a period of 6 to 12 months, she developed multiple erythematous macules with 2 faintly pigmented areas. Handheld RCM demonstrated atypical cells within the papillae in previously biopsied sites that were rebiopsied, revealing LMM (Breslow depth, 0.2 mm). Staged excision achieved clear margins, but after 8 months HRCM showed LM features. Histology confirmed the diagnosis and imiquimod was reapplied.

Comment

Diagnosis and choice of treatment modality for cases of facial LM is a challenge, and there are a number of factors that may create even more of a clinical dilemma. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for LM/LMM, and better results are achieved when using histologically controlled surgical procedures such as Mohs micrographic surgery, staged excision, or the "spaghetti technique."^15-17 However, advanced patient age, multiple comorbidities (eg, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, other conditions requiring anticoagulation therapy), large lesion size in functionally or aesthetically sensitive areas, and indiscriminate borders on photodamaged skin may make surgical excision complicated or not feasible. Additionally, prior treatments to the affected area may further obscure clinical borders, complicating the diagnosis of recurrence/persistence when observed with the naked eye, dermoscopy, or Wood lamp. Because RCM can detect small amounts of melanin and has cellular resolution, it has been suggested as a great diagnostic tool to be combined with dermoscopy when evaluating lightly pigmented/amelanotic facial lesions arising on sun-damaged skin.^18,19 In this case series, we highlighted these difficulties and showed how HRCM can be useful in a variety of scenarios, both pretreatment and posttreatment in complex LM/LMM cases.

Pretreatment Evaluation

Blind mapping biopsies of LM are prone to sample bias and depend greatly on biopsy technique; however, HRCM can guide mapping biopsies by detecting features of LM in vivo with high sensitivity.¹¹ Due to the cosmetically sensitive nature of the lesions, many physicians are discouraged to do multiple mapping biopsies, making it difficult to assess the breadth of the lesion and occult invasion. Multiple studies have shown that occult invasion was not apparent until complete lesion excision was done.^15,20,21 Agarwal-Antal et al²⁰ reported 92 cases of LM, of which 16% (15/92) had unsuspected invasion on final excisional pathology. A long-standing disadvantage of treating LM with nonsurgical modalities has been the inability to detect occult invasion or multifocal invasion within the lesion. As described in patients 1, 4, and 5 in the current case series, utilizing real-time video imaging of the DEJ at the margins and within the lesion has allowed for the detection of deep atypical melanocytes suspicious for perifollicular infiltration and invasion. Knowing the depth of invasion before treatment is essential for not only counseling the patient about disease risk but also for choosing an appropriate treatment modality. Therefore, prospective studies evaluating the performance of RCM to identify invasion are crucial to improve sampling error and avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Surgical Treatment

Although surgery is the first-line treatment option for facial LM, it is not without associated morbidity, and LM is known to have histological subclinical extension, which makes margin assessment difficult. Wide surgical margins on the face are not always possible and become further complicated when trying to maintain adequate functional and cosmetic outcomes. Additionally, the margin for surgical clearance may not be straightforward for facial lesions. Hazan et al¹⁵ showed the mean total surgical margins required for excision of LM and LMM was 7.1 and 10.3 mm, respectively; of the 91 tumors initially diagnosed as LM on biopsy, 16% (15/91) had unsuspected invasion. Guitera et al² reported that the presence of atypical cells within the dermal papillae might be a sign of invasion, which occasionally is not detected histologically due to sampling bias. Handheld RCM offers the advantage of a rapid real-time assessment in areas that may not have been amenable to previous iterations of the device, and it also provides a larger field of view that would be time consuming if performed using conventional RCM. Compared to prior RCM devices that were not handheld, the use of the HRCM does not need to attach a ring to the skin and is less bulky, permitting its use at the bedside of the patient or even intraoperatively.13 In our experience, HRCM has helped to better characterize subclinical spread of LM during the initial consultation and better counsel patients about the extent of the lesion. Handheld RCM also has been used to guide the spaghetti technique in patients with LM/LMM with good correlation between HRCM and histology.²² In our case series, HRCM was used in complex LM/LMM to delineate surgical margins, though in some cases the histologic margins were too close or affected, suggesting HRCM underestimation. Lentigo maligna margin assessment with RCM uses an algorithm that evaluates confocal features in the center of the lesion.^1,2 Therefore, further studies using HRCM should evaluate minor confocal features in the margins as potential markers of positivity to accurately delineate surgical margins.

Nonsurgical Treatment Options

For patients unable or unwilling to pursue surgical treatment, therapies such as imiquimod or radiation have been suggested.^23,24 However, the lack of histological confirmation and possibility for invasive spread has limited these modalities. Lentigo malignas treated with radiation have a 5% recurrence rate, with a median follow-up time of 3 years.²³ Recurrence often can be difficult to detect clinically, as it may manifest as an amelanotic lesion, or postradiation changes can hinder detection. Handheld RCM allows for a cellular-level observation of the irradiated field and can identify radiation-induced changes in LM lesions, including superficial necrosis, apoptotic cells, dilated vessels, and increased inflammatory cells.²⁵ Handheld RCM has previously been used to assess LM treated with radiation and, as in patient 2, can help define the radiation field and detect treatment failure or recurrence.^12,25

Similarly, as described in patient 5, HRCM was utilized to monitor treatment with imiquimod. Many reports use imiquimod for treatment of LM, but application and response vary greatly. Reflectance confocal microscopy has been shown to be useful in monitoring LM treated with imiquimod,⁸ which is important because clinical findings such as inflammation and erythema do not correlate well with response to therapy. Thus, RCM is an appealing noninvasive modality to monitor response to treatment and assess the need for longer treatment duration. Moreover, similar to postradiation changes, treatment with imiquimod may cause an alteration of the clinically apparent pigment. Therefore, it is difficult to assess treatment success by clinical inspection alone. The use of RCM before, during, and after treatment provides a longitudinal assessment of the lesion and has augmented dermatologists' ability to determine treatment success or failure; however, prospective studies evaluating the usefulness of HRCM in the recurrent setting are needed to validate these results.

Limitations

Limitations of this technology include the time needed to image large areas; technology cost; and associated learning curve, which may take from 6 months to 1 year based on our experience. Others have reported the training required for accurate RCM interpretation to be less than that of dermoscopy.²⁶ It has been shown that key RCM diagnostic criteria for lesions including melanoma and basal cell carcinoma are reproducibly recognized among RCM users and that diagnostic accuracy increases with experience.²⁷ These limitations can be overcome with advances in videomosaicing that may streamline the imaging as well as an eventual decrease in cost with greater user adoption and the development of training platforms that enable a faster learning of RCM.²⁸

Conclusion

The use of HRCM can help in the diagnosis and management of facial LMs. Handheld RCM provides longitudinal assessment of LM/LMM that may help determine treatment success or failure and has proven to be useful in detecting the presence of recurrence/persistence in cases that were clinically poorly evident. Moreover, HRCM is a notable ancillary tool, as it can be performed at the bedside of the patient or even intraoperatively and provides a faster approach than conventional RCM in cases where large areas need to be mapped.

In summary, HRCM may eventually be a useful screening tool to guide scouting biopsies to diagnose de novo LM; guide surgical and nonsurgical therapies; and evaluate the presence of recurrence/persistence, especially in large, complex, amelanotic or poorly pigmented lesions. A more standardized use of HRCM in mapping surgical and nonsurgical approaches needs to be evaluated in further studies to provide a fast and reliable complement to histology in such complex cases; therefore, larger studies need to be performed to validate this technique in such complex cases.

Lentigo maligna (LM) and LM melanoma (LMM) represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to their heterogeneous nature and location on cosmetically sensitive areas. Newer ancillary technologies such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) have helped improve diagnosis and management of these challenging lesions.^1,2

Reflectance confocal microscopy is a noninvasive laser system that provides real-time imaging of the epidermis and dermis with cellular resolution and improves diagnostic accuracy of melanocytic lesions.^2,3 Normal melanocytes appear as round bright structures on RCM that are similar in size to surrounding keratinocytes located in the basal layer and regularly distributed around the dermal papillae (junctional nevi) or form regular dense nests in the dermis (intradermal nevi).^4,5 In LM/LMM, there may be widespread infiltration of atypical melanocytes invading hair follicles; large, round, pagetoid melanocytes (larger than surrounding keratinocytes); sheets of large atypical cells at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ); loss of contour in the dermal papillae; and atypical melanocytes invading the dermal papillae.² Indeed, RCM has good correlation with the degree of histologic atypia and is useful to distinguish between benign nevi, atypical nevi, and melanoma.⁶ By combining lateral mosaics with vertical stacks, RCM allows 3-dimensional approximation of tumor margins and monitoring of nonsurgical therapies.^7,8 The advent of handheld RCM (HRCM) has allowed assessment of large lesions as well as those presenting in difficult locations.⁹ Furthermore, the generation of videomosaics overcomes the limited field of view of traditional RCM and allows for accurate assessment of large lesions.¹⁰

Traditional and handheld RCM have been used to diagnose and map primary LM.^1,2,11 Guitera et al² developed an algorithm using traditional RCM to distinguish benign facial macules and LM. In their training set, they found that when their score resulted in 2 or more points, the sensitivity and specificity to diagnose LM was 85% and 76%, respectively, with an odds ratio of 18.6 for LM. They later applied the algorithm in a test set of 44 benign facial macules and 29 LM and obtained an odds ratio of 60.7 for LM, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 93% and 82%, respectively.² This algorithm also was tested by Menge et al11 using the HRCM. They found 100% sensitivity and 71% specificity for LM when evaluating 63 equivocal facial lesions. Although these results suggest that RCM can accurately distinguish LM from benign lesions in the primary setting, few reports have studied the impact of HRCM in the recurrent setting and its impact in monitoring treatment of LM.^12,13

Herein, we present 5 cases in which HRCM was used to manage complex facial LM/LMM, highlighting its versatility and potential for use in the clinical setting (eTable).

Case Series

Following institutional review board approval, cases of facial LM/LMM presenting for assessment and treatment from January 2014 to December 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Initially, the clinical margins of the lesions were determined using Wood lamp and/or dermoscopy. Using HRCM, vertical stacks were taken at the 12-, 3-, 6-, and 9-o'clock positions, and videos were captured along the peripheral margins at the DEJ. To create videomosaics, HRCM video frames were extracted and later stitched using a computer algorithm written in a fourth-generation programming language based on prior studies.^10,14 An example HRCM video that was captured and turned into a videomosaic accompanies this article online (http://bit.ly/2oDYS6k). Additional stacks were taken in suspicious areas. We considered an area positive for LM under HRCM when the LM score developed by Guitera et al² was 2 or more. The algorithm scoring includes 2 major criteria--nonedged papillae and round large pagetoid cells--which score 2 points, and 4 minor criteria, including 3 positive criteria--atypical cells at the DEJ, follicular invasion, nucleated cells in the papillae--which each score 1 point, and 1 negative criterion--broadened honeycomb pattern--which scores -1 point.²

RELATED VIDEO: RCM Videomosaic of Melanoma In Situ

Patient 1

An 82-year-old woman was referred to us for management of an LMM on the left side of the forehead (Figure 1A). Handheld RCM from the biopsy site showed large atypical cells in the epidermis, DEJ, and papillary dermis. Superiorly, HRCM showed large dendritic processes but did not reveal LM features in 3 additional clinically worrisome areas. Biopsies showed LMM at the prior biopsy site, LM superiorly, and actinic keratosis in the remaining 3 areas, supporting the HRCM findings. Due to upstaging, the patient was referred for head and neck surgery. To aid in resection, HRCM was performed intraoperatively in a multidisciplinary approach (Figure 1B). Due to the large size of the lesion, surgical margins were taken right outside the HRCM border. Pathology showed LMM extending focally into the margins that were reexcised, achieving clearance.

Patient 2

An 88-year-old woman presented with a slightly pigmented, 2.5×2.3-cm LMM on the left cheek. Because of her age and comorbidities (eg, osteoporosis, deep vein thrombosis in both lower legs requiring anticoagulation therapy, presence of an inferior vena cava filter, bilateral lymphedema of the legs, irritable bowel syndrome, hyperparathyroidism), she was treated with imiquimod cream 5% achieving partial response. The lesion was subsequently excised showing LMM extending to the margins. Not wanting to undergo further surgery, she opted for radiation therapy. Handheld RCM was performed to guide the radiation field, showing pagetoid cells within 1 cm of the scar and clear margins beyond 2 cm. She underwent radiation therapy followed by treatment with imiquimod. On 6-month follow-up, no clinical lesion was apparent, but HRCM showed atypical cells. Biopsies revealed an atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferation, but due to patient's comorbidities, close observation was decided.

Patient 3

A 78-year-old man presented with an LMM on the right preauricular area. Handheld RCM demonstrated pleomorphic pagetoid cells along and beyond the clinical margins. Wide excision with sentinel lymph node biopsy was planned, and to aid surgery a confocal map was created (Figure 2). Margins were clear at 1 cm, except inferiorly where they extended to 1.5 cm. Using this preoperative HRCM map, all intraoperative sections were clear. Final pathology confirmed clear margins throughout.

Patient 4

A 62-year-old man presented with hyperpigmentation and bleeding on the left cheek where an LMM was previously removed 8 times over 18 years. Handheld RCM showed pleomorphic cells along the graft border and interestingly within the graft. Ten biopsies were taken, 8 at sites with confocal features that were worrisome for LM (Figures 3A and 3B) and 2 at clinically suspicious sites. The former revealed melanomas (2 that were invasive to 0.3 mm), and the latter revealed solar lentigines. The patient underwent staged excision guided by HRCM (Figure 3C), achieving clear histologic margins except for a focus in the helix. This area was RCM positive but was intentionally not resected due to reconstructive difficulties; imiquimod was indicated in this area.

Patient 5

An 85-year-old woman with 6 prior melanomas over 15 years presented with ill-defined light brown patches on the left cheek at the site where an LM was previously excised 15 years prior. Biopsies showed LM, and due to the patient's age, health, and personal preference to avoid extensive surgery, treatment with imiquimod cream 5% was decided. Over a period of 6 to 12 months, she developed multiple erythematous macules with 2 faintly pigmented areas. Handheld RCM demonstrated atypical cells within the papillae in previously biopsied sites that were rebiopsied, revealing LMM (Breslow depth, 0.2 mm). Staged excision achieved clear margins, but after 8 months HRCM showed LM features. Histology confirmed the diagnosis and imiquimod was reapplied.

Comment

Diagnosis and choice of treatment modality for cases of facial LM is a challenge, and there are a number of factors that may create even more of a clinical dilemma. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice for LM/LMM, and better results are achieved when using histologically controlled surgical procedures such as Mohs micrographic surgery, staged excision, or the "spaghetti technique."^15-17 However, advanced patient age, multiple comorbidities (eg, coronary artery disease, deep vein thrombosis, other conditions requiring anticoagulation therapy), large lesion size in functionally or aesthetically sensitive areas, and indiscriminate borders on photodamaged skin may make surgical excision complicated or not feasible. Additionally, prior treatments to the affected area may further obscure clinical borders, complicating the diagnosis of recurrence/persistence when observed with the naked eye, dermoscopy, or Wood lamp. Because RCM can detect small amounts of melanin and has cellular resolution, it has been suggested as a great diagnostic tool to be combined with dermoscopy when evaluating lightly pigmented/amelanotic facial lesions arising on sun-damaged skin.^18,19 In this case series, we highlighted these difficulties and showed how HRCM can be useful in a variety of scenarios, both pretreatment and posttreatment in complex LM/LMM cases.

Pretreatment Evaluation

Blind mapping biopsies of LM are prone to sample bias and depend greatly on biopsy technique; however, HRCM can guide mapping biopsies by detecting features of LM in vivo with high sensitivity.¹¹ Due to the cosmetically sensitive nature of the lesions, many physicians are discouraged to do multiple mapping biopsies, making it difficult to assess the breadth of the lesion and occult invasion. Multiple studies have shown that occult invasion was not apparent until complete lesion excision was done.^15,20,21 Agarwal-Antal et al²⁰ reported 92 cases of LM, of which 16% (15/92) had unsuspected invasion on final excisional pathology. A long-standing disadvantage of treating LM with nonsurgical modalities has been the inability to detect occult invasion or multifocal invasion within the lesion. As described in patients 1, 4, and 5 in the current case series, utilizing real-time video imaging of the DEJ at the margins and within the lesion has allowed for the detection of deep atypical melanocytes suspicious for perifollicular infiltration and invasion. Knowing the depth of invasion before treatment is essential for not only counseling the patient about disease risk but also for choosing an appropriate treatment modality. Therefore, prospective studies evaluating the performance of RCM to identify invasion are crucial to improve sampling error and avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Surgical Treatment

Although surgery is the first-line treatment option for facial LM, it is not without associated morbidity, and LM is known to have histological subclinical extension, which makes margin assessment difficult. Wide surgical margins on the face are not always possible and become further complicated when trying to maintain adequate functional and cosmetic outcomes. Additionally, the margin for surgical clearance may not be straightforward for facial lesions. Hazan et al¹⁵ showed the mean total surgical margins required for excision of LM and LMM was 7.1 and 10.3 mm, respectively; of the 91 tumors initially diagnosed as LM on biopsy, 16% (15/91) had unsuspected invasion. Guitera et al² reported that the presence of atypical cells within the dermal papillae might be a sign of invasion, which occasionally is not detected histologically due to sampling bias. Handheld RCM offers the advantage of a rapid real-time assessment in areas that may not have been amenable to previous iterations of the device, and it also provides a larger field of view that would be time consuming if performed using conventional RCM. Compared to prior RCM devices that were not handheld, the use of the HRCM does not need to attach a ring to the skin and is less bulky, permitting its use at the bedside of the patient or even intraoperatively.13 In our experience, HRCM has helped to better characterize subclinical spread of LM during the initial consultation and better counsel patients about the extent of the lesion. Handheld RCM also has been used to guide the spaghetti technique in patients with LM/LMM with good correlation between HRCM and histology.²² In our case series, HRCM was used in complex LM/LMM to delineate surgical margins, though in some cases the histologic margins were too close or affected, suggesting HRCM underestimation. Lentigo maligna margin assessment with RCM uses an algorithm that evaluates confocal features in the center of the lesion.^1,2 Therefore, further studies using HRCM should evaluate minor confocal features in the margins as potential markers of positivity to accurately delineate surgical margins.

Nonsurgical Treatment Options

For patients unable or unwilling to pursue surgical treatment, therapies such as imiquimod or radiation have been suggested.^23,24 However, the lack of histological confirmation and possibility for invasive spread has limited these modalities. Lentigo malignas treated with radiation have a 5% recurrence rate, with a median follow-up time of 3 years.²³ Recurrence often can be difficult to detect clinically, as it may manifest as an amelanotic lesion, or postradiation changes can hinder detection. Handheld RCM allows for a cellular-level observation of the irradiated field and can identify radiation-induced changes in LM lesions, including superficial necrosis, apoptotic cells, dilated vessels, and increased inflammatory cells.²⁵ Handheld RCM has previously been used to assess LM treated with radiation and, as in patient 2, can help define the radiation field and detect treatment failure or recurrence.^12,25

Similarly, as described in patient 5, HRCM was utilized to monitor treatment with imiquimod. Many reports use imiquimod for treatment of LM, but application and response vary greatly. Reflectance confocal microscopy has been shown to be useful in monitoring LM treated with imiquimod,⁸ which is important because clinical findings such as inflammation and erythema do not correlate well with response to therapy. Thus, RCM is an appealing noninvasive modality to monitor response to treatment and assess the need for longer treatment duration. Moreover, similar to postradiation changes, treatment with imiquimod may cause an alteration of the clinically apparent pigment. Therefore, it is difficult to assess treatment success by clinical inspection alone. The use of RCM before, during, and after treatment provides a longitudinal assessment of the lesion and has augmented dermatologists' ability to determine treatment success or failure; however, prospective studies evaluating the usefulness of HRCM in the recurrent setting are needed to validate these results.

Limitations

Limitations of this technology include the time needed to image large areas; technology cost; and associated learning curve, which may take from 6 months to 1 year based on our experience. Others have reported the training required for accurate RCM interpretation to be less than that of dermoscopy.²⁶ It has been shown that key RCM diagnostic criteria for lesions including melanoma and basal cell carcinoma are reproducibly recognized among RCM users and that diagnostic accuracy increases with experience.²⁷ These limitations can be overcome with advances in videomosaicing that may streamline the imaging as well as an eventual decrease in cost with greater user adoption and the development of training platforms that enable a faster learning of RCM.²⁸

Conclusion

The use of HRCM can help in the diagnosis and management of facial LMs. Handheld RCM provides longitudinal assessment of LM/LMM that may help determine treatment success or failure and has proven to be useful in detecting the presence of recurrence/persistence in cases that were clinically poorly evident. Moreover, HRCM is a notable ancillary tool, as it can be performed at the bedside of the patient or even intraoperatively and provides a faster approach than conventional RCM in cases where large areas need to be mapped.

In summary, HRCM may eventually be a useful screening tool to guide scouting biopsies to diagnose de novo LM; guide surgical and nonsurgical therapies; and evaluate the presence of recurrence/persistence, especially in large, complex, amelanotic or poorly pigmented lesions. A more standardized use of HRCM in mapping surgical and nonsurgical approaches needs to be evaluated in further studies to provide a fast and reliable complement to histology in such complex cases; therefore, larger studies need to be performed to validate this technique in such complex cases.

A recent executive order by President Trump that aims to overhaul a specialized visa program for foreign workers appears to have more bark than bite, immigration experts say.

The order, published April 21 in the Federal Register, calls upon federal agencies to propose new rules, guidance, and reforms to ensure that H-1B visas are granted only to fill the most highly skilled positions. The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily employ highly skilled foreign workers in specialty occupations; foreign physicians and medical students regularly use the program to practice and train in the United States.

Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 2.0

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

A recent executive order by President Trump that aims to overhaul a specialized visa program for foreign workers appears to have more bark than bite, immigration experts say.

The order, published April 21 in the Federal Register, calls upon federal agencies to propose new rules, guidance, and reforms to ensure that H-1B visas are granted only to fill the most highly skilled positions. The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily employ highly skilled foreign workers in specialty occupations; foreign physicians and medical students regularly use the program to practice and train in the United States.

Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 2.0

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

A recent executive order by President Trump that aims to overhaul a specialized visa program for foreign workers appears to have more bark than bite, immigration experts say.

The order, published April 21 in the Federal Register, calls upon federal agencies to propose new rules, guidance, and reforms to ensure that H-1B visas are granted only to fill the most highly skilled positions. The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily employ highly skilled foreign workers in specialty occupations; foreign physicians and medical students regularly use the program to practice and train in the United States.

Gage Skidmore/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 2.0

[email protected]

On Twitter @legal_med

Sun exposure and sunburns sustained during childhood are linked to an increased risk for development of skin cancers in adulthood. In infants, the skin is particularly vulnerable and is considered to be at increased risk for UV radiation damage,¹ even as early as the first 6 months of life.² Sun-safe behaviors instituted from a young age may help reduce the risk for future skin cancers.³ To effectively teach parents proper sun-safe practices, it is essential to understand their existing perceptions and behaviors. This study sought to examine differences in infant sun-safety practices during the first 6 months of life among black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white (NHW) parents in Miami, Florida.

Methods

Parents presenting to the University of Miami general pediatrics clinic from February 2015 through April 2015 with a child younger than 5 years were administered a 15-item questionnaire that included items on demographics, sun-safety strategies, sunburns and tanning, beliefs and limitations regarding sunscreen, and primary information source regarding sun safety (eg, physician, Internet, media, instincts). Parents were approached by the investigators consecutively for participation in scheduled blocks, with the exception of those who were otherwise engaged in appointment-related tasks (eg, paperwork). The study was approved by the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine institutional review board. The primary objective of this study was to determine the sun protection behaviors that black and Hispanic parents in Miami, Florida, employ in infants younger than 6 months. Secondary objectives included determining if this patient population is at risk for infant sunburns and tanning, beliefs among parents regarding sunscreen's efficacy in the prevention of skin cancers, and limitations of sunscreen use.

All data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.3. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher exact test, and proportional-odds cumulative logit model were used to compare nonparametric data. Parents reporting on the full first 6 months of life (ie, the child was older than 6 months at the time of study completion) were included for analysis of sun-safety strategies. All survey respondents were included for analysis of secondary objectives. Responses from parents of infants of mixed racial and ethnic backgrounds were excluded from applicable subgroup analyses.

Results

Ninety-eight parents were approached for participation in the study; 97 consented to participate and 95 completed the survey. Seventy parents had children who were at least 6 months of age and were included for analysis of the primary objectives (ie, sun-protection strategies in the first 6 months of life). The cohort included 49 Hispanic parents, 26 black parents, and 9 NHW parents; 5 parents indicated their child was of mixed racial and ethnic background. Six respondents indicated another minority group (eg, Native American, Pacific Islander). Eighty-three respondents were mothers, 72 were educated beyond high school, and 14 were Spanish-speaking only. Four reported a known family history of skin cancer.

There were notable differences in application of sunscreen, belief in the efficacy of sunscreen, and primary source of information between parents (Tables 1 and 2). Hispanic parents reported applying sunscreen more consistently than black parents (odds ratio, 4.656; 95% confidence interval, 1.154-18.782; P<.01). Hispanic parents also were more likely than black parents to believe sunscreen is effective in the prevention of skin cancers (odds ratio, 7.499; 95% confidence interval, 1.535-36.620; P<.01). Hispanic parents were more likely to report receiving information regarding sun-safety practices for infants from their pediatrician, whereas NHW parents were more likely to follow their instincts regarding how and if infants should be exposed to the sun (P<.05). No significant differences were found in the reported primary source of information in black versus Hispanic parents or in black versus NHW parents. Three percent (3/95) of respondents reported a sunburn in the infant's first 6 months of life, and 12% (11/95) reported tanning of infants' skin from sun exposure. Tanning was associated with inconsistent shade (P<.01), inconsistent clothing coverage (P<.01), and consistently allowing infants to "develop tolerance to the sun's rays by slowly increasing sun exposure each day" (P<.05).

Comment

The survey results indicated suboptimal sun-protection practices among parents of black and Hispanic infants in Miami. Although the majority of respondents (83% [58/70]) reported keeping their infants in the shade, less than half of parents consistently covered their infants adequately with clothing and hats (40% [28/70] and 43% [30/70], respectively). More alarmingly, one-third of parents reported intentionally increasing their infant's level of sun exposure to develop his/her tolerance to the sun. A minority of parents reported sunburns (3%) and tanning (12%) within the first 6 months of life. Twenty-nine percent of parents (20/70) reported consistently applying sunscreen to their infants who were younger than 6 months despite limited safety data available for this age group.

Although our study included a limited sample size and represents a narrow geographic distribution, these results suggest that shortcomings in current practices in sun protection for black and Hispanic infants younger than 6 months may be a widespread problem. Black and Hispanic patients have a lower incidence of skin cancer, but the diagnosis often is delayed and the mortality is higher when skin cancer does occur.⁴ The common perception among laypeople as well as many health care providers that black and Hispanic individuals are not at risk for skin cancer may limit sun-safety counseling as well as the overall knowledge base of this patient demographic. As demonstrated by the results of this study, there is a need for counseling on sun-safe behaviors from a young age among this population.

Conclusion

This study highlights potential shortcomings in current sun-protection practices for black and Hispanic infants younger than 6 months. Sun-safe behaviors instituted from a young age may help reduce the risk for future skin cancers.³ Additional studies are needed to further define sun-safety behaviors in black and Hispanic children across the United States. Further, additional studies should focus on developing interventions that positively influence sun-safety behaviors in this patient population. 

Sun exposure and sunburns sustained during childhood are linked to an increased risk for development of skin cancers in adulthood. In infants, the skin is particularly vulnerable and is considered to be at increased risk for UV radiation damage,¹ even as early as the first 6 months of life.² Sun-safe behaviors instituted from a young age may help reduce the risk for future skin cancers.³ To effectively teach parents proper sun-safe practices, it is essential to understand their existing perceptions and behaviors. This study sought to examine differences in infant sun-safety practices during the first 6 months of life among black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white (NHW) parents in Miami, Florida.

Methods

Parents presenting to the University of Miami general pediatrics clinic from February 2015 through April 2015 with a child younger than 5 years were administered a 15-item questionnaire that included items on demographics, sun-safety strategies, sunburns and tanning, beliefs and limitations regarding sunscreen, and primary information source regarding sun safety (eg, physician, Internet, media, instincts). Parents were approached by the investigators consecutively for participation in scheduled blocks, with the exception of those who were otherwise engaged in appointment-related tasks (eg, paperwork). The study was approved by the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine institutional review board. The primary objective of this study was to determine the sun protection behaviors that black and Hispanic parents in Miami, Florida, employ in infants younger than 6 months. Secondary objectives included determining if this patient population is at risk for infant sunburns and tanning, beliefs among parents regarding sunscreen's efficacy in the prevention of skin cancers, and limitations of sunscreen use.

All data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.3. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher exact test, and proportional-odds cumulative logit model were used to compare nonparametric data. Parents reporting on the full first 6 months of life (ie, the child was older than 6 months at the time of study completion) were included for analysis of sun-safety strategies. All survey respondents were included for analysis of secondary objectives. Responses from parents of infants of mixed racial and ethnic backgrounds were excluded from applicable subgroup analyses.

Results

Ninety-eight parents were approached for participation in the study; 97 consented to participate and 95 completed the survey. Seventy parents had children who were at least 6 months of age and were included for analysis of the primary objectives (ie, sun-protection strategies in the first 6 months of life). The cohort included 49 Hispanic parents, 26 black parents, and 9 NHW parents; 5 parents indicated their child was of mixed racial and ethnic background. Six respondents indicated another minority group (eg, Native American, Pacific Islander). Eighty-three respondents were mothers, 72 were educated beyond high school, and 14 were Spanish-speaking only. Four reported a known family history of skin cancer.

There were notable differences in application of sunscreen, belief in the efficacy of sunscreen, and primary source of information between parents (Tables 1 and 2). Hispanic parents reported applying sunscreen more consistently than black parents (odds ratio, 4.656; 95% confidence interval, 1.154-18.782; P<.01). Hispanic parents also were more likely than black parents to believe sunscreen is effective in the prevention of skin cancers (odds ratio, 7.499; 95% confidence interval, 1.535-36.620; P<.01). Hispanic parents were more likely to report receiving information regarding sun-safety practices for infants from their pediatrician, whereas NHW parents were more likely to follow their instincts regarding how and if infants should be exposed to the sun (P<.05). No significant differences were found in the reported primary source of information in black versus Hispanic parents or in black versus NHW parents. Three percent (3/95) of respondents reported a sunburn in the infant's first 6 months of life, and 12% (11/95) reported tanning of infants' skin from sun exposure. Tanning was associated with inconsistent shade (P<.01), inconsistent clothing coverage (P<.01), and consistently allowing infants to "develop tolerance to the sun's rays by slowly increasing sun exposure each day" (P<.05).

Comment

The survey results indicated suboptimal sun-protection practices among parents of black and Hispanic infants in Miami. Although the majority of respondents (83% [58/70]) reported keeping their infants in the shade, less than half of parents consistently covered their infants adequately with clothing and hats (40% [28/70] and 43% [30/70], respectively). More alarmingly, one-third of parents reported intentionally increasing their infant's level of sun exposure to develop his/her tolerance to the sun. A minority of parents reported sunburns (3%) and tanning (12%) within the first 6 months of life. Twenty-nine percent of parents (20/70) reported consistently applying sunscreen to their infants who were younger than 6 months despite limited safety data available for this age group.

Although our study included a limited sample size and represents a narrow geographic distribution, these results suggest that shortcomings in current practices in sun protection for black and Hispanic infants younger than 6 months may be a widespread problem. Black and Hispanic patients have a lower incidence of skin cancer, but the diagnosis often is delayed and the mortality is higher when skin cancer does occur.⁴ The common perception among laypeople as well as many health care providers that black and Hispanic individuals are not at risk for skin cancer may limit sun-safety counseling as well as the overall knowledge base of this patient demographic. As demonstrated by the results of this study, there is a need for counseling on sun-safe behaviors from a young age among this population.

Conclusion

This study highlights potential shortcomings in current sun-protection practices for black and Hispanic infants younger than 6 months. Sun-safe behaviors instituted from a young age may help reduce the risk for future skin cancers.³ Additional studies are needed to further define sun-safety behaviors in black and Hispanic children across the United States. Further, additional studies should focus on developing interventions that positively influence sun-safety behaviors in this patient population. 

Sun exposure and sunburns sustained during childhood are linked to an increased risk for development of skin cancers in adulthood. In infants, the skin is particularly vulnerable and is considered to be at increased risk for UV radiation damage,¹ even as early as the first 6 months of life.² Sun-safe behaviors instituted from a young age may help reduce the risk for future skin cancers.³ To effectively teach parents proper sun-safe practices, it is essential to understand their existing perceptions and behaviors. This study sought to examine differences in infant sun-safety practices during the first 6 months of life among black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic white (NHW) parents in Miami, Florida.

Methods

Parents presenting to the University of Miami general pediatrics clinic from February 2015 through April 2015 with a child younger than 5 years were administered a 15-item questionnaire that included items on demographics, sun-safety strategies, sunburns and tanning, beliefs and limitations regarding sunscreen, and primary information source regarding sun safety (eg, physician, Internet, media, instincts). Parents were approached by the investigators consecutively for participation in scheduled blocks, with the exception of those who were otherwise engaged in appointment-related tasks (eg, paperwork). The study was approved by the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine institutional review board. The primary objective of this study was to determine the sun protection behaviors that black and Hispanic parents in Miami, Florida, employ in infants younger than 6 months. Secondary objectives included determining if this patient population is at risk for infant sunburns and tanning, beliefs among parents regarding sunscreen's efficacy in the prevention of skin cancers, and limitations of sunscreen use.

All data were analyzed using SAS software version 9.3. Wilcoxon signed rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Fisher exact test, and proportional-odds cumulative logit model were used to compare nonparametric data. Parents reporting on the full first 6 months of life (ie, the child was older than 6 months at the time of study completion) were included for analysis of sun-safety strategies. All survey respondents were included for analysis of secondary objectives. Responses from parents of infants of mixed racial and ethnic backgrounds were excluded from applicable subgroup analyses.

Results

Ninety-eight parents were approached for participation in the study; 97 consented to participate and 95 completed the survey. Seventy parents had children who were at least 6 months of age and were included for analysis of the primary objectives (ie, sun-protection strategies in the first 6 months of life). The cohort included 49 Hispanic parents, 26 black parents, and 9 NHW parents; 5 parents indicated their child was of mixed racial and ethnic background. Six respondents indicated another minority group (eg, Native American, Pacific Islander). Eighty-three respondents were mothers, 72 were educated beyond high school, and 14 were Spanish-speaking only. Four reported a known family history of skin cancer.

There were notable differences in application of sunscreen, belief in the efficacy of sunscreen, and primary source of information between parents (Tables 1 and 2). Hispanic parents reported applying sunscreen more consistently than black parents (odds ratio, 4.656; 95% confidence interval, 1.154-18.782; P<.01). Hispanic parents also were more likely than black parents to believe sunscreen is effective in the prevention of skin cancers (odds ratio, 7.499; 95% confidence interval, 1.535-36.620; P<.01). Hispanic parents were more likely to report receiving information regarding sun-safety practices for infants from their pediatrician, whereas NHW parents were more likely to follow their instincts regarding how and if infants should be exposed to the sun (P<.05). No significant differences were found in the reported primary source of information in black versus Hispanic parents or in black versus NHW parents. Three percent (3/95) of respondents reported a sunburn in the infant's first 6 months of life, and 12% (11/95) reported tanning of infants' skin from sun exposure. Tanning was associated with inconsistent shade (P<.01), inconsistent clothing coverage (P<.01), and consistently allowing infants to "develop tolerance to the sun's rays by slowly increasing sun exposure each day" (P<.05).

Comment

The survey results indicated suboptimal sun-protection practices among parents of black and Hispanic infants in Miami. Although the majority of respondents (83% [58/70]) reported keeping their infants in the shade, less than half of parents consistently covered their infants adequately with clothing and hats (40% [28/70] and 43% [30/70], respectively). More alarmingly, one-third of parents reported intentionally increasing their infant's level of sun exposure to develop his/her tolerance to the sun. A minority of parents reported sunburns (3%) and tanning (12%) within the first 6 months of life. Twenty-nine percent of parents (20/70) reported consistently applying sunscreen to their infants who were younger than 6 months despite limited safety data available for this age group.

Although our study included a limited sample size and represents a narrow geographic distribution, these results suggest that shortcomings in current practices in sun protection for black and Hispanic infants younger than 6 months may be a widespread problem. Black and Hispanic patients have a lower incidence of skin cancer, but the diagnosis often is delayed and the mortality is higher when skin cancer does occur.⁴ The common perception among laypeople as well as many health care providers that black and Hispanic individuals are not at risk for skin cancer may limit sun-safety counseling as well as the overall knowledge base of this patient demographic. As demonstrated by the results of this study, there is a need for counseling on sun-safe behaviors from a young age among this population.

Conclusion

This study highlights potential shortcomings in current sun-protection practices for black and Hispanic infants younger than 6 months. Sun-safe behaviors instituted from a young age may help reduce the risk for future skin cancers.³ Additional studies are needed to further define sun-safety behaviors in black and Hispanic children across the United States. Further, additional studies should focus on developing interventions that positively influence sun-safety behaviors in this patient population. 

It’s a fine line between compensated and decompensated endocrine conditions, and often, there is an underlying non–endocrine component complicating the diagnosis.

That’s according to Marilyn Tan, MD, a clinical assistant professor of medicine at Stanford (Calif.) University, where she is chief of the endocrinology clinic. She spoke about endocrinology emergencies during a case-based, rapid-fire session at HM17.

“Endocrine emergencies are usually due to an excess or a deficiency of a hormone,” Dr. Tan said, noting that these can take time to bring into balance. This is one reason Dr. Tan counseled not waiting for laboratory results before administering treatment.

To diagnose and treat diabetic ketoacidosis, combined with a hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, Dr. Tan recommended checking hypoglycemia levels, which she said are often mild, and to check anion gap, pH, and ketones. It’s also important to be generous with IV fluids, to administer insulin only if the ketoacidosis level is greater than 3.3 mEq/L, and to not take the patient off an insulin drip too early or inappropriately. To prevent readmissions, the patient on discharge should have adequate diabetes supplies, education on their condition, and timely follow-up, Dr. Tan recommended.

For patients experiencing a thyroid storm, Dr. Tan advised that thyroid function tests are a poor surrogate for predicting who will decompensate. The clinical distinction is made by documentation of acute organ dysfunction. Reducing T3 to T4 conversion means propylthiouracil is preferred over methimazole.

Ongoing management of a myxedema coma means monitoring the clinical parameters of the patient’s mental status, cardiac and pulmonary functions, while keeping the levothyroxine dose steady and checking lab values every 1-2 days to ensure the patient is progressing.

Suspect pituitary apoplexy in cases of hypertension, major surgery, trauma, anticoagulation, pregnancy, or if there is a large sellar mass. If choosing to image a patient, Dr. Tan recommended using an MRI rather than a CT scan, which she said is less sensitive. Immediate hydrocortisone treatment must be administered, she said. About 90% of cases of acute hypercalcemia are caused by hyperparathyroidism in the outpatient setting, and malignancy in the inpatient setting, Dr. Tan said. Also, these patients tend to be volume depleted, so assessment of their ability to tolerate hydration is essential.

Regarding all endocrine emergencies, Dr. Tan said, “When in doubt, be more aggressive with treatment.”

Dr. Tan had no relevant financial disclosures.

It’s a fine line between compensated and decompensated endocrine conditions, and often, there is an underlying non–endocrine component complicating the diagnosis.

That’s according to Marilyn Tan, MD, a clinical assistant professor of medicine at Stanford (Calif.) University, where she is chief of the endocrinology clinic. She spoke about endocrinology emergencies during a case-based, rapid-fire session at HM17.

“Endocrine emergencies are usually due to an excess or a deficiency of a hormone,” Dr. Tan said, noting that these can take time to bring into balance. This is one reason Dr. Tan counseled not waiting for laboratory results before administering treatment.

To diagnose and treat diabetic ketoacidosis, combined with a hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, Dr. Tan recommended checking hypoglycemia levels, which she said are often mild, and to check anion gap, pH, and ketones. It’s also important to be generous with IV fluids, to administer insulin only if the ketoacidosis level is greater than 3.3 mEq/L, and to not take the patient off an insulin drip too early or inappropriately. To prevent readmissions, the patient on discharge should have adequate diabetes supplies, education on their condition, and timely follow-up, Dr. Tan recommended.

For patients experiencing a thyroid storm, Dr. Tan advised that thyroid function tests are a poor surrogate for predicting who will decompensate. The clinical distinction is made by documentation of acute organ dysfunction. Reducing T3 to T4 conversion means propylthiouracil is preferred over methimazole.

Ongoing management of a myxedema coma means monitoring the clinical parameters of the patient’s mental status, cardiac and pulmonary functions, while keeping the levothyroxine dose steady and checking lab values every 1-2 days to ensure the patient is progressing.

Suspect pituitary apoplexy in cases of hypertension, major surgery, trauma, anticoagulation, pregnancy, or if there is a large sellar mass. If choosing to image a patient, Dr. Tan recommended using an MRI rather than a CT scan, which she said is less sensitive. Immediate hydrocortisone treatment must be administered, she said. About 90% of cases of acute hypercalcemia are caused by hyperparathyroidism in the outpatient setting, and malignancy in the inpatient setting, Dr. Tan said. Also, these patients tend to be volume depleted, so assessment of their ability to tolerate hydration is essential.

Regarding all endocrine emergencies, Dr. Tan said, “When in doubt, be more aggressive with treatment.”

Dr. Tan had no relevant financial disclosures.

It’s a fine line between compensated and decompensated endocrine conditions, and often, there is an underlying non–endocrine component complicating the diagnosis.

That’s according to Marilyn Tan, MD, a clinical assistant professor of medicine at Stanford (Calif.) University, where she is chief of the endocrinology clinic. She spoke about endocrinology emergencies during a case-based, rapid-fire session at HM17.

“Endocrine emergencies are usually due to an excess or a deficiency of a hormone,” Dr. Tan said, noting that these can take time to bring into balance. This is one reason Dr. Tan counseled not waiting for laboratory results before administering treatment.

To diagnose and treat diabetic ketoacidosis, combined with a hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state, Dr. Tan recommended checking hypoglycemia levels, which she said are often mild, and to check anion gap, pH, and ketones. It’s also important to be generous with IV fluids, to administer insulin only if the ketoacidosis level is greater than 3.3 mEq/L, and to not take the patient off an insulin drip too early or inappropriately. To prevent readmissions, the patient on discharge should have adequate diabetes supplies, education on their condition, and timely follow-up, Dr. Tan recommended.

For patients experiencing a thyroid storm, Dr. Tan advised that thyroid function tests are a poor surrogate for predicting who will decompensate. The clinical distinction is made by documentation of acute organ dysfunction. Reducing T3 to T4 conversion means propylthiouracil is preferred over methimazole.

Ongoing management of a myxedema coma means monitoring the clinical parameters of the patient’s mental status, cardiac and pulmonary functions, while keeping the levothyroxine dose steady and checking lab values every 1-2 days to ensure the patient is progressing.

Suspect pituitary apoplexy in cases of hypertension, major surgery, trauma, anticoagulation, pregnancy, or if there is a large sellar mass. If choosing to image a patient, Dr. Tan recommended using an MRI rather than a CT scan, which she said is less sensitive. Immediate hydrocortisone treatment must be administered, she said. About 90% of cases of acute hypercalcemia are caused by hyperparathyroidism in the outpatient setting, and malignancy in the inpatient setting, Dr. Tan said. Also, these patients tend to be volume depleted, so assessment of their ability to tolerate hydration is essential.

Regarding all endocrine emergencies, Dr. Tan said, “When in doubt, be more aggressive with treatment.”

Dr. Tan had no relevant financial disclosures.

In 2015, nearly 2.4 million Americans had an opioid use disorder. Close to 80% did not receive treatment. To help change those numbers, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has developed a free mobile application called MATx that supports medication-assisted treatment. The app “empowers health care practitioners to provide effective, evidence-based care for people with opioid use disorder.” Features include the following:

• Information on treatment approaches and medications approved by the FDA for use in treating opioid use disorders;
• A buprenorphine prescribing guide, including information on the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 waiver process and patient limits;
• Clinical support tools, such as treatment guidelines, ICD-10 coding, and recommendations for working with special populations;
• Access to critical helplines and SAMHSA’s treatment locators.

For more information on the app, visit http://store.samhsa.gov/apps/mat/tools/index.html?WT.ac=PEPAdSpreadWord20161018Prof.

In 2015, nearly 2.4 million Americans had an opioid use disorder. Close to 80% did not receive treatment. To help change those numbers, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has developed a free mobile application called MATx that supports medication-assisted treatment. The app “empowers health care practitioners to provide effective, evidence-based care for people with opioid use disorder.” Features include the following:

• Information on treatment approaches and medications approved by the FDA for use in treating opioid use disorders;
• A buprenorphine prescribing guide, including information on the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 waiver process and patient limits;
• Clinical support tools, such as treatment guidelines, ICD-10 coding, and recommendations for working with special populations;
• Access to critical helplines and SAMHSA’s treatment locators.

For more information on the app, visit http://store.samhsa.gov/apps/mat/tools/index.html?WT.ac=PEPAdSpreadWord20161018Prof.

In 2015, nearly 2.4 million Americans had an opioid use disorder. Close to 80% did not receive treatment. To help change those numbers, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) has developed a free mobile application called MATx that supports medication-assisted treatment. The app “empowers health care practitioners to provide effective, evidence-based care for people with opioid use disorder.” Features include the following:

• Information on treatment approaches and medications approved by the FDA for use in treating opioid use disorders;
• A buprenorphine prescribing guide, including information on the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 waiver process and patient limits;
• Clinical support tools, such as treatment guidelines, ICD-10 coding, and recommendations for working with special populations;
• Access to critical helplines and SAMHSA’s treatment locators.

For more information on the app, visit http://store.samhsa.gov/apps/mat/tools/index.html?WT.ac=PEPAdSpreadWord20161018Prof.

Sometimes the final day of a convention is nothing more than the “getaway day.”

But not at HM17. Not this year.

The finale of the 2017 annual meeting is capped off, as has become tradition, by a speech from the dean of hospital medicine: Robert Wachter, MD, MHM. The last time Dr. Wachter gave his address from a Vegas stage, it ended with him in head-to-toe Elton John regalia. While there’s no guarantee of a wardrobe reprisal, the annual address from the man who helped name the specialty promises to entertain and inform, said HM17 course director Lenny Feldman, MD, SFHM.

Sometimes the final day of a convention is nothing more than the “getaway day.”

But not at HM17. Not this year.

The finale of the 2017 annual meeting is capped off, as has become tradition, by a speech from the dean of hospital medicine: Robert Wachter, MD, MHM. The last time Dr. Wachter gave his address from a Vegas stage, it ended with him in head-to-toe Elton John regalia. While there’s no guarantee of a wardrobe reprisal, the annual address from the man who helped name the specialty promises to entertain and inform, said HM17 course director Lenny Feldman, MD, SFHM.

Sometimes the final day of a convention is nothing more than the “getaway day.”

But not at HM17. Not this year.

The finale of the 2017 annual meeting is capped off, as has become tradition, by a speech from the dean of hospital medicine: Robert Wachter, MD, MHM. The last time Dr. Wachter gave his address from a Vegas stage, it ended with him in head-to-toe Elton John regalia. While there’s no guarantee of a wardrobe reprisal, the annual address from the man who helped name the specialty promises to entertain and inform, said HM17 course director Lenny Feldman, MD, SFHM.