User login
Central centrifugal cicatricial alopecia called epidemic in skin of color
NEW YORK – For unclear reasons, the prevalence of , creating an urgent need for early diagnosis and treatment, according to an expert who described this phenomenon at the Skin of Color Update 2019.
“CCCA has reached epidemic proportions,” contended Susan Taylor, MD, director of diversity, department of dermatology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia.
Published data place prevalence rates of CCCA somewhere in the range of 3% to 6% among black women, but Dr. Taylor reported that she believes the condition is underdiagnosed. “I am seeing far more patients now than I was 30 years ago,” she maintained.
Others participating in the Skin of Color Update 2019 agreed. Heather Woolery-Lloyd, MD, director of ethnic skin care, department of dermatology and cutaneous surgery, University of Miami, also called the rising incidence of CCCA “an epidemic.” She, like Dr. Taylor, emphasized the critical importance of early diagnosis and treatment.
“I tell patients that if we can prevent hair loss over the next 10 years, this is a treatment success,” Dr. Woolery-Lloyd said. Although hair regrowth can be achieved in a minority of patients with treatments such as minoxidil, “the first goal is to prevent hair loss.”
Upon diagnosis, Dr. Woolery-Lloyd recommends treatment with intralesional triamcinolone and topical steroids immediately, adding other agents, such as oral antibiotics, if needed. Even in cases where CCCA has been identified before hair loss is visible, Dr. Woolery-Lloyd advised immediate therapy. Given that CCCA is a disease of reversible hair loss, she said, “do not take a wait-and-see approach.”
One potential obstacle for early diagnosis of CCCA, shared by other types of alopecia that are common in skin of color, is the failure of many clinicians to employ a standardized diagnosis in this patient population.
“If you do not have tightly coiled hair, it does not mean you cannot understand tightly coiled hair, but you have to learn, and you have to let patients know that you understand and have experience,” said Dr. Taylor, emphasizing the role of reassuring patients so they can be confident in the clinical recommendations.
Part of this reassurance will be derived from “interacting with patients in a culturally competent manner,” Dr. Taylor said. Clinicians must develop comfort and confidence in physically examining the hair and scalp, in asking patients to remove weaves or braids for a thorough inspection, and in avoiding comments that might be misinterpreted. Among these, she advised tactful questions about shampooing to avoid any implication that the clinician is implying inadequate hygiene.
When CCCA is suspected, a “biopsy is important” even in circumstances when the diagnosis seems straightforward. For one reason, a substantial proportion of patients may have a concomitant diagnosis. Dr. Taylor cited data from one study in which nearly 20% of CCCA patients also had traction alopecia and more than 10% had androgenic alopecia. Other coexisting problems identified on biopsy, including infection or seborrheic dermatitis, can help clinicians tailor a more effective intervention.
The initial signs of CCCA are typically hair breakage in the vertex of the scalp, which then expands in a central centrifugal pattern, according to Dr. Taylor. Although not all patients have signs of inflammation, such as itching and pustules, inhibition of inflammation represents the first line of therapy.
Relative to hair in the white population, the hair of black individuals grows more slowly and is more fragile, with greater amounts of breakage, said Dr. Taylor, citing published studies that support these differences. To improve early diagnosis of CCCA, understanding the hair in the black population is the first step for spotting problems in routine physical examinations. It may be this lack of familiarity that is contributing to underdiagnosis of CCCA.
“Almost 70% of African-American patients feel that physicians do not understand their hair,” Dr. Taylor said. “Let’s begin to change that.”
Cautioning that it is too often assumed that hairstyles and hair care, such as relaxants or hot combs, are the source of hair loss in black women, Dr. Taylor advised not to jump to conclusions. As an example, she described a case where weaves, braids, and other strategies were employed to mask alopecia after CCCA developed, not before.
“CCCA is the most important cause of scarring alopecia in African-American women,” Dr. Taylor said. Reiterating that hair loss can be prevented or modified with treatment, she added that this places the emphasis on first obtaining an accurate diagnosis.
Dr. Taylor has a financial relationship with Biersdorf; Dr. Woolery-Lloyd has financial relationships with Allergan, Galderma, Ortho Diagnostics, Pfizer, and Somabella Laboratories.
NEW YORK – For unclear reasons, the prevalence of , creating an urgent need for early diagnosis and treatment, according to an expert who described this phenomenon at the Skin of Color Update 2019.
“CCCA has reached epidemic proportions,” contended Susan Taylor, MD, director of diversity, department of dermatology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia.
Published data place prevalence rates of CCCA somewhere in the range of 3% to 6% among black women, but Dr. Taylor reported that she believes the condition is underdiagnosed. “I am seeing far more patients now than I was 30 years ago,” she maintained.
Others participating in the Skin of Color Update 2019 agreed. Heather Woolery-Lloyd, MD, director of ethnic skin care, department of dermatology and cutaneous surgery, University of Miami, also called the rising incidence of CCCA “an epidemic.” She, like Dr. Taylor, emphasized the critical importance of early diagnosis and treatment.
“I tell patients that if we can prevent hair loss over the next 10 years, this is a treatment success,” Dr. Woolery-Lloyd said. Although hair regrowth can be achieved in a minority of patients with treatments such as minoxidil, “the first goal is to prevent hair loss.”
Upon diagnosis, Dr. Woolery-Lloyd recommends treatment with intralesional triamcinolone and topical steroids immediately, adding other agents, such as oral antibiotics, if needed. Even in cases where CCCA has been identified before hair loss is visible, Dr. Woolery-Lloyd advised immediate therapy. Given that CCCA is a disease of reversible hair loss, she said, “do not take a wait-and-see approach.”
One potential obstacle for early diagnosis of CCCA, shared by other types of alopecia that are common in skin of color, is the failure of many clinicians to employ a standardized diagnosis in this patient population.
“If you do not have tightly coiled hair, it does not mean you cannot understand tightly coiled hair, but you have to learn, and you have to let patients know that you understand and have experience,” said Dr. Taylor, emphasizing the role of reassuring patients so they can be confident in the clinical recommendations.
Part of this reassurance will be derived from “interacting with patients in a culturally competent manner,” Dr. Taylor said. Clinicians must develop comfort and confidence in physically examining the hair and scalp, in asking patients to remove weaves or braids for a thorough inspection, and in avoiding comments that might be misinterpreted. Among these, she advised tactful questions about shampooing to avoid any implication that the clinician is implying inadequate hygiene.
When CCCA is suspected, a “biopsy is important” even in circumstances when the diagnosis seems straightforward. For one reason, a substantial proportion of patients may have a concomitant diagnosis. Dr. Taylor cited data from one study in which nearly 20% of CCCA patients also had traction alopecia and more than 10% had androgenic alopecia. Other coexisting problems identified on biopsy, including infection or seborrheic dermatitis, can help clinicians tailor a more effective intervention.
The initial signs of CCCA are typically hair breakage in the vertex of the scalp, which then expands in a central centrifugal pattern, according to Dr. Taylor. Although not all patients have signs of inflammation, such as itching and pustules, inhibition of inflammation represents the first line of therapy.
Relative to hair in the white population, the hair of black individuals grows more slowly and is more fragile, with greater amounts of breakage, said Dr. Taylor, citing published studies that support these differences. To improve early diagnosis of CCCA, understanding the hair in the black population is the first step for spotting problems in routine physical examinations. It may be this lack of familiarity that is contributing to underdiagnosis of CCCA.
“Almost 70% of African-American patients feel that physicians do not understand their hair,” Dr. Taylor said. “Let’s begin to change that.”
Cautioning that it is too often assumed that hairstyles and hair care, such as relaxants or hot combs, are the source of hair loss in black women, Dr. Taylor advised not to jump to conclusions. As an example, she described a case where weaves, braids, and other strategies were employed to mask alopecia after CCCA developed, not before.
“CCCA is the most important cause of scarring alopecia in African-American women,” Dr. Taylor said. Reiterating that hair loss can be prevented or modified with treatment, she added that this places the emphasis on first obtaining an accurate diagnosis.
Dr. Taylor has a financial relationship with Biersdorf; Dr. Woolery-Lloyd has financial relationships with Allergan, Galderma, Ortho Diagnostics, Pfizer, and Somabella Laboratories.
NEW YORK – For unclear reasons, the prevalence of , creating an urgent need for early diagnosis and treatment, according to an expert who described this phenomenon at the Skin of Color Update 2019.
“CCCA has reached epidemic proportions,” contended Susan Taylor, MD, director of diversity, department of dermatology, Penn Medicine, Philadelphia.
Published data place prevalence rates of CCCA somewhere in the range of 3% to 6% among black women, but Dr. Taylor reported that she believes the condition is underdiagnosed. “I am seeing far more patients now than I was 30 years ago,” she maintained.
Others participating in the Skin of Color Update 2019 agreed. Heather Woolery-Lloyd, MD, director of ethnic skin care, department of dermatology and cutaneous surgery, University of Miami, also called the rising incidence of CCCA “an epidemic.” She, like Dr. Taylor, emphasized the critical importance of early diagnosis and treatment.
“I tell patients that if we can prevent hair loss over the next 10 years, this is a treatment success,” Dr. Woolery-Lloyd said. Although hair regrowth can be achieved in a minority of patients with treatments such as minoxidil, “the first goal is to prevent hair loss.”
Upon diagnosis, Dr. Woolery-Lloyd recommends treatment with intralesional triamcinolone and topical steroids immediately, adding other agents, such as oral antibiotics, if needed. Even in cases where CCCA has been identified before hair loss is visible, Dr. Woolery-Lloyd advised immediate therapy. Given that CCCA is a disease of reversible hair loss, she said, “do not take a wait-and-see approach.”
One potential obstacle for early diagnosis of CCCA, shared by other types of alopecia that are common in skin of color, is the failure of many clinicians to employ a standardized diagnosis in this patient population.
“If you do not have tightly coiled hair, it does not mean you cannot understand tightly coiled hair, but you have to learn, and you have to let patients know that you understand and have experience,” said Dr. Taylor, emphasizing the role of reassuring patients so they can be confident in the clinical recommendations.
Part of this reassurance will be derived from “interacting with patients in a culturally competent manner,” Dr. Taylor said. Clinicians must develop comfort and confidence in physically examining the hair and scalp, in asking patients to remove weaves or braids for a thorough inspection, and in avoiding comments that might be misinterpreted. Among these, she advised tactful questions about shampooing to avoid any implication that the clinician is implying inadequate hygiene.
When CCCA is suspected, a “biopsy is important” even in circumstances when the diagnosis seems straightforward. For one reason, a substantial proportion of patients may have a concomitant diagnosis. Dr. Taylor cited data from one study in which nearly 20% of CCCA patients also had traction alopecia and more than 10% had androgenic alopecia. Other coexisting problems identified on biopsy, including infection or seborrheic dermatitis, can help clinicians tailor a more effective intervention.
The initial signs of CCCA are typically hair breakage in the vertex of the scalp, which then expands in a central centrifugal pattern, according to Dr. Taylor. Although not all patients have signs of inflammation, such as itching and pustules, inhibition of inflammation represents the first line of therapy.
Relative to hair in the white population, the hair of black individuals grows more slowly and is more fragile, with greater amounts of breakage, said Dr. Taylor, citing published studies that support these differences. To improve early diagnosis of CCCA, understanding the hair in the black population is the first step for spotting problems in routine physical examinations. It may be this lack of familiarity that is contributing to underdiagnosis of CCCA.
“Almost 70% of African-American patients feel that physicians do not understand their hair,” Dr. Taylor said. “Let’s begin to change that.”
Cautioning that it is too often assumed that hairstyles and hair care, such as relaxants or hot combs, are the source of hair loss in black women, Dr. Taylor advised not to jump to conclusions. As an example, she described a case where weaves, braids, and other strategies were employed to mask alopecia after CCCA developed, not before.
“CCCA is the most important cause of scarring alopecia in African-American women,” Dr. Taylor said. Reiterating that hair loss can be prevented or modified with treatment, she added that this places the emphasis on first obtaining an accurate diagnosis.
Dr. Taylor has a financial relationship with Biersdorf; Dr. Woolery-Lloyd has financial relationships with Allergan, Galderma, Ortho Diagnostics, Pfizer, and Somabella Laboratories.
REPORTING FROM SOC 2019
Twitter Chat: Skin Cancer
Join us on Tuesday, October 8, 2019, at 8:00 pm EST on Twitter at #MDedgeChats as we discuss skin cancer, and what’s new in sunscreen, skin of color, and melanoma.
Special guests include physicians with expertise in dermatology and skin cancer, Anthony Rossi, MD (@DrAnthonyRossi), Julie Amthor Croley, MD, 15k followers on IG (@Drskinandsmiles), and Candrice Heath, MD (@DrCandriceHeath). Background information about the chat can be found below.
What will the conversation cover?
Q1: What are the most common types of skin cancer?
Q2: What recent research findings can better inform patients about skin cancer risks?
Q3: What’s the difference between melanoma in fair skin vs. darker skin?
Q4: How does the risk of skin cancer differ in people with darker skin?
Q5: Why should sunscreen be used even in the fall and winter?
Follow us here: @MDedgeDerm | @MDedgeTweets | #MDedgeChats
About Dr. Rossi:
Dr. Anthony Rossi (@DrAnthonyRossi) is a board-certified dermatologist with fellowship training in Mohs micrographic surgery, cosmetic and laser surgery, and advanced cutaneous oncology at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College program, both in New York. He specializes in skin cancer surgery, cosmetic dermatologic surgery, and laser surgery.
His research includes quality of life in cancer survivors, the use of noninvasive imaging of the skin, and nonsurgical treatments of skin cancer. Additionally, Dr. Rossi is active in dermatologic organizations and advocacy for medicine.
Research and Publications by Dr. Rossi
About Dr. Heath:
Dr. Candrice Heath (@DrCandriceHeath) is Assistant Professor of Dermatology at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with fellowship training in pediatric dermatology at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Heath is triple board certified in pediatrics, dermatology, and pediatric dermatology. She specializes in adult and pediatric dermatology, skin of color, acne, and eczema. Dr. Heath also enjoys educating primary care physicians on the front lines of health care and delivering easy to understand information to consumers.
Research and publications by Dr. Heath
Guest host of MDedge podcast: A sunscreen update with Dr. Vincent DeLeo.
About Dr. Croley:
Dr. Julie Amthor Croley (@Drskinandsmiles) also known as “Dr. Skin and Smiles” has 15,000 followers on Instagram, and is a Chief Dermatology Resident at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas. She has a special interest in skin cancer and dermatological surgery and hopes to complete a fellowship in Mohs micrographic surgery after residency. In her free time, Dr. Croley enjoys spending time with her husband (an orthopedic surgeon), running and competing in marathons, and spending time on the beach.
Cutaneous melanoma is the most fatal form of skin cancer and is a considerable public health concern in the United States. Early detection and management of skin cancer can lead to decreased morbidity and mortality from skin cancer. As a result, the American Academy of Dermatology Association supports safe sun-protective practices and diligent self-screening for changing lesions.
Sunscreen use is an essential component of sun protection. New regulations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have left consumers concerned about the safety of sunscreens. According to a recent Cutis editorial from Vincent A. DeLeo, MD, “There is no question that, as physicians, we want to ‘first, do no harm,’ so we should all be interested in assuring our patients that our sunscreen recommendations are safe and we support the FDA proposal for additional data.”
Patients with skin of color experience disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality when diagnosed with melanoma. “Poor prognosis in patients with skin of color is multifactorial and may be due to poor use of sun protection, misconceptions about melanoma risk, atypical clinical presentation, impaired access to care, and delay in diagnosis,” according to a recent Cutis article.
Population-based skin cancer screening performed exclusively by dermatologists is not practical. Primary care physicians and other experts in melanoma and public health need to be involved in reducing melanoma mortality.
In this chat, we will provide expert recommendations on the diagnosis of skin cancer, preventive measures, and the latest research discussed among physicians.
- “Doctor, Do I Need a Skin Check?”
- Assessing the effectiveness of knowledge-based interventions in skin of color populations.
- Melanoma in US Hispanics
- Podcast: Sunscreen update from Dr. Vincent DeLeo
- Windshield and UV exposure
- Racial, ethnic minorities often don’t practice sun-protective behaviors.
- Sunscreen regulations and advice for your patients.
Join us on Tuesday, October 8, 2019, at 8:00 pm EST on Twitter at #MDedgeChats as we discuss skin cancer, and what’s new in sunscreen, skin of color, and melanoma.
Special guests include physicians with expertise in dermatology and skin cancer, Anthony Rossi, MD (@DrAnthonyRossi), Julie Amthor Croley, MD, 15k followers on IG (@Drskinandsmiles), and Candrice Heath, MD (@DrCandriceHeath). Background information about the chat can be found below.
What will the conversation cover?
Q1: What are the most common types of skin cancer?
Q2: What recent research findings can better inform patients about skin cancer risks?
Q3: What’s the difference between melanoma in fair skin vs. darker skin?
Q4: How does the risk of skin cancer differ in people with darker skin?
Q5: Why should sunscreen be used even in the fall and winter?
Follow us here: @MDedgeDerm | @MDedgeTweets | #MDedgeChats
About Dr. Rossi:
Dr. Anthony Rossi (@DrAnthonyRossi) is a board-certified dermatologist with fellowship training in Mohs micrographic surgery, cosmetic and laser surgery, and advanced cutaneous oncology at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College program, both in New York. He specializes in skin cancer surgery, cosmetic dermatologic surgery, and laser surgery.
His research includes quality of life in cancer survivors, the use of noninvasive imaging of the skin, and nonsurgical treatments of skin cancer. Additionally, Dr. Rossi is active in dermatologic organizations and advocacy for medicine.
Research and Publications by Dr. Rossi
About Dr. Heath:
Dr. Candrice Heath (@DrCandriceHeath) is Assistant Professor of Dermatology at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with fellowship training in pediatric dermatology at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Heath is triple board certified in pediatrics, dermatology, and pediatric dermatology. She specializes in adult and pediatric dermatology, skin of color, acne, and eczema. Dr. Heath also enjoys educating primary care physicians on the front lines of health care and delivering easy to understand information to consumers.
Research and publications by Dr. Heath
Guest host of MDedge podcast: A sunscreen update with Dr. Vincent DeLeo.
About Dr. Croley:
Dr. Julie Amthor Croley (@Drskinandsmiles) also known as “Dr. Skin and Smiles” has 15,000 followers on Instagram, and is a Chief Dermatology Resident at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas. She has a special interest in skin cancer and dermatological surgery and hopes to complete a fellowship in Mohs micrographic surgery after residency. In her free time, Dr. Croley enjoys spending time with her husband (an orthopedic surgeon), running and competing in marathons, and spending time on the beach.
Cutaneous melanoma is the most fatal form of skin cancer and is a considerable public health concern in the United States. Early detection and management of skin cancer can lead to decreased morbidity and mortality from skin cancer. As a result, the American Academy of Dermatology Association supports safe sun-protective practices and diligent self-screening for changing lesions.
Sunscreen use is an essential component of sun protection. New regulations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have left consumers concerned about the safety of sunscreens. According to a recent Cutis editorial from Vincent A. DeLeo, MD, “There is no question that, as physicians, we want to ‘first, do no harm,’ so we should all be interested in assuring our patients that our sunscreen recommendations are safe and we support the FDA proposal for additional data.”
Patients with skin of color experience disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality when diagnosed with melanoma. “Poor prognosis in patients with skin of color is multifactorial and may be due to poor use of sun protection, misconceptions about melanoma risk, atypical clinical presentation, impaired access to care, and delay in diagnosis,” according to a recent Cutis article.
Population-based skin cancer screening performed exclusively by dermatologists is not practical. Primary care physicians and other experts in melanoma and public health need to be involved in reducing melanoma mortality.
In this chat, we will provide expert recommendations on the diagnosis of skin cancer, preventive measures, and the latest research discussed among physicians.
- “Doctor, Do I Need a Skin Check?”
- Assessing the effectiveness of knowledge-based interventions in skin of color populations.
- Melanoma in US Hispanics
- Podcast: Sunscreen update from Dr. Vincent DeLeo
- Windshield and UV exposure
- Racial, ethnic minorities often don’t practice sun-protective behaviors.
- Sunscreen regulations and advice for your patients.
Join us on Tuesday, October 8, 2019, at 8:00 pm EST on Twitter at #MDedgeChats as we discuss skin cancer, and what’s new in sunscreen, skin of color, and melanoma.
Special guests include physicians with expertise in dermatology and skin cancer, Anthony Rossi, MD (@DrAnthonyRossi), Julie Amthor Croley, MD, 15k followers on IG (@Drskinandsmiles), and Candrice Heath, MD (@DrCandriceHeath). Background information about the chat can be found below.
What will the conversation cover?
Q1: What are the most common types of skin cancer?
Q2: What recent research findings can better inform patients about skin cancer risks?
Q3: What’s the difference between melanoma in fair skin vs. darker skin?
Q4: How does the risk of skin cancer differ in people with darker skin?
Q5: Why should sunscreen be used even in the fall and winter?
Follow us here: @MDedgeDerm | @MDedgeTweets | #MDedgeChats
About Dr. Rossi:
Dr. Anthony Rossi (@DrAnthonyRossi) is a board-certified dermatologist with fellowship training in Mohs micrographic surgery, cosmetic and laser surgery, and advanced cutaneous oncology at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College program, both in New York. He specializes in skin cancer surgery, cosmetic dermatologic surgery, and laser surgery.
His research includes quality of life in cancer survivors, the use of noninvasive imaging of the skin, and nonsurgical treatments of skin cancer. Additionally, Dr. Rossi is active in dermatologic organizations and advocacy for medicine.
Research and Publications by Dr. Rossi
About Dr. Heath:
Dr. Candrice Heath (@DrCandriceHeath) is Assistant Professor of Dermatology at the Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with fellowship training in pediatric dermatology at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Dr. Heath is triple board certified in pediatrics, dermatology, and pediatric dermatology. She specializes in adult and pediatric dermatology, skin of color, acne, and eczema. Dr. Heath also enjoys educating primary care physicians on the front lines of health care and delivering easy to understand information to consumers.
Research and publications by Dr. Heath
Guest host of MDedge podcast: A sunscreen update with Dr. Vincent DeLeo.
About Dr. Croley:
Dr. Julie Amthor Croley (@Drskinandsmiles) also known as “Dr. Skin and Smiles” has 15,000 followers on Instagram, and is a Chief Dermatology Resident at the University of Texas Medical Branch in Galveston, Texas. She has a special interest in skin cancer and dermatological surgery and hopes to complete a fellowship in Mohs micrographic surgery after residency. In her free time, Dr. Croley enjoys spending time with her husband (an orthopedic surgeon), running and competing in marathons, and spending time on the beach.
Cutaneous melanoma is the most fatal form of skin cancer and is a considerable public health concern in the United States. Early detection and management of skin cancer can lead to decreased morbidity and mortality from skin cancer. As a result, the American Academy of Dermatology Association supports safe sun-protective practices and diligent self-screening for changing lesions.
Sunscreen use is an essential component of sun protection. New regulations from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have left consumers concerned about the safety of sunscreens. According to a recent Cutis editorial from Vincent A. DeLeo, MD, “There is no question that, as physicians, we want to ‘first, do no harm,’ so we should all be interested in assuring our patients that our sunscreen recommendations are safe and we support the FDA proposal for additional data.”
Patients with skin of color experience disproportionately higher morbidity and mortality when diagnosed with melanoma. “Poor prognosis in patients with skin of color is multifactorial and may be due to poor use of sun protection, misconceptions about melanoma risk, atypical clinical presentation, impaired access to care, and delay in diagnosis,” according to a recent Cutis article.
Population-based skin cancer screening performed exclusively by dermatologists is not practical. Primary care physicians and other experts in melanoma and public health need to be involved in reducing melanoma mortality.
In this chat, we will provide expert recommendations on the diagnosis of skin cancer, preventive measures, and the latest research discussed among physicians.
- “Doctor, Do I Need a Skin Check?”
- Assessing the effectiveness of knowledge-based interventions in skin of color populations.
- Melanoma in US Hispanics
- Podcast: Sunscreen update from Dr. Vincent DeLeo
- Windshield and UV exposure
- Racial, ethnic minorities often don’t practice sun-protective behaviors.
- Sunscreen regulations and advice for your patients.
TAVR, SAVR share same infective endocarditis risk
PARIS – The risk of infective endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis proved to be the same as after surgical replacement in a French national propensity score–matched study.
This finding from what is believed to be the largest-ever study of infective endocarditis following TAVR will come as a surprise to many physicians. It’s easy to mistakenly assume the risk of this feared complication is lower – and perhaps even negligible – in TAVR patients since the procedure doesn’t involve a significant surgical wound, it’s briefer, the hospital length of stay is shorter, and recovery time is markedly less than with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Not so, Laurent Fauchier, MD, PhD, said in presenting the study findings at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
“Do not think there is a lower risk of infective endocarditis. Be aware, be careful, and provide appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, just as surgeons do in SAVR. Don’t think, as I did, that with TAVR with no pacemaker implantation there is no risk of infective endocarditis. The TAVR valve is a device, it’s a prosthesis, and the risk is very similar to that of surgery,” advised Dr. Fauchier, a cardiologist at Francois Rabelais University in Tours, France.
He presented a study of all of the nearly 108,000 patients who underwent isolated TAVR or SAVR in France during 2010-2018. The data source was the French national administrative hospital discharge record system. Since the TAVR patients were overall markedly older and sicker than the SAVR patients, especially during the first years of the study, he and his coinvestigators performed propensity score matching using 30 variables, which enabled them to narrow the field of inquiry down to a carefully selected study population of 16,291 TAVR patients and an equal number of closely similar SAVR patients.
A total of 1,070 cases of infective endocarditis occurred during a mean follow-up of just over 2 years. The rate of hospital admission for this complication was 1.89% per year in the TAVR group and similar at 1.71% per year in the SAVR cohort.
Of note, all-cause mortality in TAVR patients who developed infective endocarditis was 1.32-fold greater than it was in SAVR patients with infective endocarditis, a statistically significant difference. The explanation for the increased mortality risk in the TAVR group probably has to do at least in part with an inability on the part of the investigators to fully capture and control for the TAVR group’s greater frailty, according to the cardiologist.
Risk factors for infective endocarditis shared in common by TAVR and SAVR patients included male gender, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and a greater frailty index. The main predictors unique to the TAVR patients were atrial fibrillation, anemia, and tricuspid regurgitation. And although pacemaker and defibrillator implantation were risk factors for infective endocarditis in the SAVR patients, it wasn’t predictive of increased risk in the TAVR population. Dr. Fauchier called this finding “quite reassuring” given that roughly 20% of the TAVR group received a pacemaker.
The causative microorganisms for infective endocarditis were essentially the same in the TAVR and SAVR groups, simplifying antimicrobial prophylaxis decision making.
Dr. Fauchier reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, conducted free of commercial support. He serves as a consultant to and/or on speakers’ bureaus for Bayer, BMS Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and Novartis.
PARIS – The risk of infective endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis proved to be the same as after surgical replacement in a French national propensity score–matched study.
This finding from what is believed to be the largest-ever study of infective endocarditis following TAVR will come as a surprise to many physicians. It’s easy to mistakenly assume the risk of this feared complication is lower – and perhaps even negligible – in TAVR patients since the procedure doesn’t involve a significant surgical wound, it’s briefer, the hospital length of stay is shorter, and recovery time is markedly less than with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Not so, Laurent Fauchier, MD, PhD, said in presenting the study findings at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
“Do not think there is a lower risk of infective endocarditis. Be aware, be careful, and provide appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, just as surgeons do in SAVR. Don’t think, as I did, that with TAVR with no pacemaker implantation there is no risk of infective endocarditis. The TAVR valve is a device, it’s a prosthesis, and the risk is very similar to that of surgery,” advised Dr. Fauchier, a cardiologist at Francois Rabelais University in Tours, France.
He presented a study of all of the nearly 108,000 patients who underwent isolated TAVR or SAVR in France during 2010-2018. The data source was the French national administrative hospital discharge record system. Since the TAVR patients were overall markedly older and sicker than the SAVR patients, especially during the first years of the study, he and his coinvestigators performed propensity score matching using 30 variables, which enabled them to narrow the field of inquiry down to a carefully selected study population of 16,291 TAVR patients and an equal number of closely similar SAVR patients.
A total of 1,070 cases of infective endocarditis occurred during a mean follow-up of just over 2 years. The rate of hospital admission for this complication was 1.89% per year in the TAVR group and similar at 1.71% per year in the SAVR cohort.
Of note, all-cause mortality in TAVR patients who developed infective endocarditis was 1.32-fold greater than it was in SAVR patients with infective endocarditis, a statistically significant difference. The explanation for the increased mortality risk in the TAVR group probably has to do at least in part with an inability on the part of the investigators to fully capture and control for the TAVR group’s greater frailty, according to the cardiologist.
Risk factors for infective endocarditis shared in common by TAVR and SAVR patients included male gender, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and a greater frailty index. The main predictors unique to the TAVR patients were atrial fibrillation, anemia, and tricuspid regurgitation. And although pacemaker and defibrillator implantation were risk factors for infective endocarditis in the SAVR patients, it wasn’t predictive of increased risk in the TAVR population. Dr. Fauchier called this finding “quite reassuring” given that roughly 20% of the TAVR group received a pacemaker.
The causative microorganisms for infective endocarditis were essentially the same in the TAVR and SAVR groups, simplifying antimicrobial prophylaxis decision making.
Dr. Fauchier reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, conducted free of commercial support. He serves as a consultant to and/or on speakers’ bureaus for Bayer, BMS Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and Novartis.
PARIS – The risk of infective endocarditis following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis proved to be the same as after surgical replacement in a French national propensity score–matched study.
This finding from what is believed to be the largest-ever study of infective endocarditis following TAVR will come as a surprise to many physicians. It’s easy to mistakenly assume the risk of this feared complication is lower – and perhaps even negligible – in TAVR patients since the procedure doesn’t involve a significant surgical wound, it’s briefer, the hospital length of stay is shorter, and recovery time is markedly less than with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Not so, Laurent Fauchier, MD, PhD, said in presenting the study findings at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
“Do not think there is a lower risk of infective endocarditis. Be aware, be careful, and provide appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis, just as surgeons do in SAVR. Don’t think, as I did, that with TAVR with no pacemaker implantation there is no risk of infective endocarditis. The TAVR valve is a device, it’s a prosthesis, and the risk is very similar to that of surgery,” advised Dr. Fauchier, a cardiologist at Francois Rabelais University in Tours, France.
He presented a study of all of the nearly 108,000 patients who underwent isolated TAVR or SAVR in France during 2010-2018. The data source was the French national administrative hospital discharge record system. Since the TAVR patients were overall markedly older and sicker than the SAVR patients, especially during the first years of the study, he and his coinvestigators performed propensity score matching using 30 variables, which enabled them to narrow the field of inquiry down to a carefully selected study population of 16,291 TAVR patients and an equal number of closely similar SAVR patients.
A total of 1,070 cases of infective endocarditis occurred during a mean follow-up of just over 2 years. The rate of hospital admission for this complication was 1.89% per year in the TAVR group and similar at 1.71% per year in the SAVR cohort.
Of note, all-cause mortality in TAVR patients who developed infective endocarditis was 1.32-fold greater than it was in SAVR patients with infective endocarditis, a statistically significant difference. The explanation for the increased mortality risk in the TAVR group probably has to do at least in part with an inability on the part of the investigators to fully capture and control for the TAVR group’s greater frailty, according to the cardiologist.
Risk factors for infective endocarditis shared in common by TAVR and SAVR patients included male gender, a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and a greater frailty index. The main predictors unique to the TAVR patients were atrial fibrillation, anemia, and tricuspid regurgitation. And although pacemaker and defibrillator implantation were risk factors for infective endocarditis in the SAVR patients, it wasn’t predictive of increased risk in the TAVR population. Dr. Fauchier called this finding “quite reassuring” given that roughly 20% of the TAVR group received a pacemaker.
The causative microorganisms for infective endocarditis were essentially the same in the TAVR and SAVR groups, simplifying antimicrobial prophylaxis decision making.
Dr. Fauchier reported having no financial conflicts regarding the study, conducted free of commercial support. He serves as a consultant to and/or on speakers’ bureaus for Bayer, BMS Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and Novartis.
REPORTING FROM THE ESC CONGRESS 2019
Scars and color changes on face
The FP recognized the scarring, skin atrophy, erythema and hyperpigmentation in the malar distribution as discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). Upon examination, the FP noted similar patterns (with the addition of hypopigmentation) in the conchal bowls of both pinna. This was confirmatory for the DLE diagnosis (AKA chronic cutaneous lupus). (If in doubt, a 4-mm punch biopsy could be performed on the lesions of the face.) Without the lesions in the ears, sarcoidosis might have been considered as part of the differential diagnosis.
DLE lesions are characterized by discrete, erythematous, slightly infiltrated papules or plaques. Hypopigmentation develops in the central area and hyperpigmentation develops at the active border. Resolution of the active lesion results in atrophy and scarring.
In this case, the FP explained the diagnosis of DLE to the patient and ordered testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), a complete blood count, and comprehensive metabolic panel. All the labs were normal, and the ANA was negative, which confirmed that this was not a case of systemic lupus erythematosus. Patients with only DLE generally have negative or low-titer ANA titers.
DLE therapy includes corticosteroids (topical or intralesional) and oral antimalarials, such as hydroxychloroquine. The FP in this case started the patient on hydroxychloroquine 200 mg bid and topical triamcinolone 0.1% applied twice daily to the erythematous portions of the cheeks for 2 weeks. At the 2-week follow-up, the patient’s skin looked less red and inflamed and she was happy with the improved appearance of her skin. Patients on hydroxychloroquine need a baseline eye exam by an ophthalmologist and then yearly exams after 5 years of therapy to detect any retinal or visual field problems.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Pye A, Mayeaux, EJ, Mishra V, et al. Lupus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. eds. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019:1183-1193.
To learn more about the newest 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine, see: https://www.amazon.com/Color-Atlas-Synopsis-Family-Medicine/dp/1259862046/
You can get the 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: https://usatinemedia.com/app/color-atlas-of-family-medicine/
The FP recognized the scarring, skin atrophy, erythema and hyperpigmentation in the malar distribution as discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). Upon examination, the FP noted similar patterns (with the addition of hypopigmentation) in the conchal bowls of both pinna. This was confirmatory for the DLE diagnosis (AKA chronic cutaneous lupus). (If in doubt, a 4-mm punch biopsy could be performed on the lesions of the face.) Without the lesions in the ears, sarcoidosis might have been considered as part of the differential diagnosis.
DLE lesions are characterized by discrete, erythematous, slightly infiltrated papules or plaques. Hypopigmentation develops in the central area and hyperpigmentation develops at the active border. Resolution of the active lesion results in atrophy and scarring.
In this case, the FP explained the diagnosis of DLE to the patient and ordered testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), a complete blood count, and comprehensive metabolic panel. All the labs were normal, and the ANA was negative, which confirmed that this was not a case of systemic lupus erythematosus. Patients with only DLE generally have negative or low-titer ANA titers.
DLE therapy includes corticosteroids (topical or intralesional) and oral antimalarials, such as hydroxychloroquine. The FP in this case started the patient on hydroxychloroquine 200 mg bid and topical triamcinolone 0.1% applied twice daily to the erythematous portions of the cheeks for 2 weeks. At the 2-week follow-up, the patient’s skin looked less red and inflamed and she was happy with the improved appearance of her skin. Patients on hydroxychloroquine need a baseline eye exam by an ophthalmologist and then yearly exams after 5 years of therapy to detect any retinal or visual field problems.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Pye A, Mayeaux, EJ, Mishra V, et al. Lupus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. eds. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019:1183-1193.
To learn more about the newest 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine, see: https://www.amazon.com/Color-Atlas-Synopsis-Family-Medicine/dp/1259862046/
You can get the 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: https://usatinemedia.com/app/color-atlas-of-family-medicine/
The FP recognized the scarring, skin atrophy, erythema and hyperpigmentation in the malar distribution as discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE). Upon examination, the FP noted similar patterns (with the addition of hypopigmentation) in the conchal bowls of both pinna. This was confirmatory for the DLE diagnosis (AKA chronic cutaneous lupus). (If in doubt, a 4-mm punch biopsy could be performed on the lesions of the face.) Without the lesions in the ears, sarcoidosis might have been considered as part of the differential diagnosis.
DLE lesions are characterized by discrete, erythematous, slightly infiltrated papules or plaques. Hypopigmentation develops in the central area and hyperpigmentation develops at the active border. Resolution of the active lesion results in atrophy and scarring.
In this case, the FP explained the diagnosis of DLE to the patient and ordered testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA), a complete blood count, and comprehensive metabolic panel. All the labs were normal, and the ANA was negative, which confirmed that this was not a case of systemic lupus erythematosus. Patients with only DLE generally have negative or low-titer ANA titers.
DLE therapy includes corticosteroids (topical or intralesional) and oral antimalarials, such as hydroxychloroquine. The FP in this case started the patient on hydroxychloroquine 200 mg bid and topical triamcinolone 0.1% applied twice daily to the erythematous portions of the cheeks for 2 weeks. At the 2-week follow-up, the patient’s skin looked less red and inflamed and she was happy with the improved appearance of her skin. Patients on hydroxychloroquine need a baseline eye exam by an ophthalmologist and then yearly exams after 5 years of therapy to detect any retinal or visual field problems.
Photos and text for Photo Rounds Friday courtesy of Richard P. Usatine, MD. This case was adapted from: Pye A, Mayeaux, EJ, Mishra V, et al. Lupus. In: Usatine R, Smith M, Mayeaux EJ, et al. eds. Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2019:1183-1193.
To learn more about the newest 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine, see: https://www.amazon.com/Color-Atlas-Synopsis-Family-Medicine/dp/1259862046/
You can get the 3rd edition of the Color Atlas and Synopsis of Family Medicine as an app by clicking on this link: https://usatinemedia.com/app/color-atlas-of-family-medicine/
IPD in children may be a signal of immunodeficiency
according to a systematic review published in JAMA Pediatrics.
Coen Butters, BMed, DCH, of the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, and coauthors wrote that, even with optimal vaccine coverage, there is still a group of children with increased susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), and this could be a potential marker of primary immunodeficiency.
They conducted a systematic review of 17 studies of 6,002 children to examine the evidence on the incidence of primary immunodeficiency in children who presented with IPD but without any other risk factors or predisposing conditions.
Overall, the frequency of primary immunodeficiency in children presenting with IPD who did not have any other predisposing condition ranged from 1% to 26%.
One study of 162 children with IPD, which had an overall frequency of primary immunodeficiency of 10%, found that children older than 2 years were significantly more likely to have primary immunodeficiency than those aged under 2 years (26% vs. 3%; P less than .001).
Primary antibody deficiency was the most commonly diagnosed immunodeficiency in these children with IPD, accounting for 71% of cases. These deficiencies presented as hypogammaglobulinemia, specific pneumococcal antibody deficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and IgG2 deficiency.
The review also included four studies that looked at the frequency of mannose-binding lectin deficiency in 1,493 children with primary IPD. Two of these studies reported a prevalence of mannose-binding lectin deficiency ranging from 31% in children aged younger than 2 years to 41% in children younger than 1 year.
Five studies looked at the rate of primary immunodeficiency in children presenting with recurrent IPD. In addition to other predisposing conditions such as sickle cell disease, cancer, and anatomical breach in the blood-brain barrier, the three studies that screened for primary immunodeficiency found rates ranging from 10% to 67%. The most common conditions were complement deficiency, pneumococcal antibody deficiency, and a single case of TLR-signaling defect.
In a study of 162 children with primary IPD, screening for asplenia identified a single case of congenital asplenia. In another study of 2,498 cases of IPD, 22 patients had asplenia at presentation, half of whom died at presentation.
Dr. Butters and associates concluded that “this review’s findings suggests that existing data support the immune evaluation of children older than 2 years without a known predisposing condition who present with their first episode of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, pneumonia, or recurrent IPD. Immune evaluation should include assessment for immunoglobulin deficiency, pneumococcal antibody deficiency, complement disorders, and asplenia.”
In an accompanying editorial, Stephen I. Pelton, MD, of the Maxwell Finland Laboratory for Infectious Diseases at Boston Medical Center, and coauthors wrote that in children with recurrent episodes of IPD caused by nonvaccine serotypes – particularly those aged over 5 years – evaluation for primary immunodeficiencies could uncover immune defects.
“Once identified, direct and indirect protection, penicillin prophylaxis, or a combination of these offers great potential for disease prevention and reduction of mortality and morbidity in children with [primary immunodeficiency],” they wrote.
No funding or conflicts of interest were declared for the study. Two of the editorialists declared research funding or honoraria from the pharmaceutical sector.
SOURCES: Butters C et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3203; Pelton SI et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3185.
according to a systematic review published in JAMA Pediatrics.
Coen Butters, BMed, DCH, of the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, and coauthors wrote that, even with optimal vaccine coverage, there is still a group of children with increased susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), and this could be a potential marker of primary immunodeficiency.
They conducted a systematic review of 17 studies of 6,002 children to examine the evidence on the incidence of primary immunodeficiency in children who presented with IPD but without any other risk factors or predisposing conditions.
Overall, the frequency of primary immunodeficiency in children presenting with IPD who did not have any other predisposing condition ranged from 1% to 26%.
One study of 162 children with IPD, which had an overall frequency of primary immunodeficiency of 10%, found that children older than 2 years were significantly more likely to have primary immunodeficiency than those aged under 2 years (26% vs. 3%; P less than .001).
Primary antibody deficiency was the most commonly diagnosed immunodeficiency in these children with IPD, accounting for 71% of cases. These deficiencies presented as hypogammaglobulinemia, specific pneumococcal antibody deficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and IgG2 deficiency.
The review also included four studies that looked at the frequency of mannose-binding lectin deficiency in 1,493 children with primary IPD. Two of these studies reported a prevalence of mannose-binding lectin deficiency ranging from 31% in children aged younger than 2 years to 41% in children younger than 1 year.
Five studies looked at the rate of primary immunodeficiency in children presenting with recurrent IPD. In addition to other predisposing conditions such as sickle cell disease, cancer, and anatomical breach in the blood-brain barrier, the three studies that screened for primary immunodeficiency found rates ranging from 10% to 67%. The most common conditions were complement deficiency, pneumococcal antibody deficiency, and a single case of TLR-signaling defect.
In a study of 162 children with primary IPD, screening for asplenia identified a single case of congenital asplenia. In another study of 2,498 cases of IPD, 22 patients had asplenia at presentation, half of whom died at presentation.
Dr. Butters and associates concluded that “this review’s findings suggests that existing data support the immune evaluation of children older than 2 years without a known predisposing condition who present with their first episode of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, pneumonia, or recurrent IPD. Immune evaluation should include assessment for immunoglobulin deficiency, pneumococcal antibody deficiency, complement disorders, and asplenia.”
In an accompanying editorial, Stephen I. Pelton, MD, of the Maxwell Finland Laboratory for Infectious Diseases at Boston Medical Center, and coauthors wrote that in children with recurrent episodes of IPD caused by nonvaccine serotypes – particularly those aged over 5 years – evaluation for primary immunodeficiencies could uncover immune defects.
“Once identified, direct and indirect protection, penicillin prophylaxis, or a combination of these offers great potential for disease prevention and reduction of mortality and morbidity in children with [primary immunodeficiency],” they wrote.
No funding or conflicts of interest were declared for the study. Two of the editorialists declared research funding or honoraria from the pharmaceutical sector.
SOURCES: Butters C et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3203; Pelton SI et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3185.
according to a systematic review published in JAMA Pediatrics.
Coen Butters, BMed, DCH, of the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne, and coauthors wrote that, even with optimal vaccine coverage, there is still a group of children with increased susceptibility to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD), and this could be a potential marker of primary immunodeficiency.
They conducted a systematic review of 17 studies of 6,002 children to examine the evidence on the incidence of primary immunodeficiency in children who presented with IPD but without any other risk factors or predisposing conditions.
Overall, the frequency of primary immunodeficiency in children presenting with IPD who did not have any other predisposing condition ranged from 1% to 26%.
One study of 162 children with IPD, which had an overall frequency of primary immunodeficiency of 10%, found that children older than 2 years were significantly more likely to have primary immunodeficiency than those aged under 2 years (26% vs. 3%; P less than .001).
Primary antibody deficiency was the most commonly diagnosed immunodeficiency in these children with IPD, accounting for 71% of cases. These deficiencies presented as hypogammaglobulinemia, specific pneumococcal antibody deficiency, X-linked agammaglobulinemia, and IgG2 deficiency.
The review also included four studies that looked at the frequency of mannose-binding lectin deficiency in 1,493 children with primary IPD. Two of these studies reported a prevalence of mannose-binding lectin deficiency ranging from 31% in children aged younger than 2 years to 41% in children younger than 1 year.
Five studies looked at the rate of primary immunodeficiency in children presenting with recurrent IPD. In addition to other predisposing conditions such as sickle cell disease, cancer, and anatomical breach in the blood-brain barrier, the three studies that screened for primary immunodeficiency found rates ranging from 10% to 67%. The most common conditions were complement deficiency, pneumococcal antibody deficiency, and a single case of TLR-signaling defect.
In a study of 162 children with primary IPD, screening for asplenia identified a single case of congenital asplenia. In another study of 2,498 cases of IPD, 22 patients had asplenia at presentation, half of whom died at presentation.
Dr. Butters and associates concluded that “this review’s findings suggests that existing data support the immune evaluation of children older than 2 years without a known predisposing condition who present with their first episode of Streptococcus pneumoniae meningitis, pneumonia, or recurrent IPD. Immune evaluation should include assessment for immunoglobulin deficiency, pneumococcal antibody deficiency, complement disorders, and asplenia.”
In an accompanying editorial, Stephen I. Pelton, MD, of the Maxwell Finland Laboratory for Infectious Diseases at Boston Medical Center, and coauthors wrote that in children with recurrent episodes of IPD caused by nonvaccine serotypes – particularly those aged over 5 years – evaluation for primary immunodeficiencies could uncover immune defects.
“Once identified, direct and indirect protection, penicillin prophylaxis, or a combination of these offers great potential for disease prevention and reduction of mortality and morbidity in children with [primary immunodeficiency],” they wrote.
No funding or conflicts of interest were declared for the study. Two of the editorialists declared research funding or honoraria from the pharmaceutical sector.
SOURCES: Butters C et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3203; Pelton SI et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2019 Sep 30. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.3185.
FROM JAMA PEDIATRICS
Targeted agents vs. chemoimmunotherapy as first-line treatment of CLL
SAN FRANCISCO – Should targeted agents replace chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)? A recent debate suggests there’s no consensus. 
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, debated the topic at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.
Dr. Wierda argued that CLL patients should receive a BTK inhibitor or BCL2 inhibitor, with or without obinutuzumab, as first-line therapy because these targeted agents have been shown to provide better progression-free survival (PFS) than CIT, and the targeted therapies may prolong overall survival (OS) as well.
Dr. Brown countered that targeted agents don’t improve PFS for all CLL patients, improved PFS doesn’t always translate to improved OS, and targeted agents cost more than CIT.
No role for CIT as first-line treatment
“We have two approaches right now, with nonchemoimmunotherapy-based treatment,” Dr. Wierda said. “One approach, with small-molecule inhibitors, is to have a sustained and durable period of disease control, particularly with BTK inhibitors. The other strategy that has emerged is deep remissions with fixed-duration treatment with BCL2 small-molecule inhibitor-based therapy, which, I would argue, is better than being exposed to genotoxic chemoimmunotherapy.”
Dr. Wierda went on to explain that the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been shown to improve PFS, compared with CIT, in phase 3 trials.
In the iLLUMINATE trial, researchers compared ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab as first-line treatment in CLL. At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, the median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 19 months in the chlorambucil arm (P less than .0001; Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20[1]:43-56).
In the A041202 study, researchers compared ibrutinib alone (Ib) or in combination with rituximab (Ib-R) to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in untreated, older patients with CLL. The 2-year PFS estimates were 74% in the BR arm, 87% in the Ib arm, and 88% in the Ib-R arm (P less than .001 for BR vs. Ib or Ib-R; N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28).
In the E1912 trial, researchers compared Ib-R to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in younger, untreated CLL patients. The 3-year PFS was 89.4% with Ib-R and 72.9% with FCR (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43).
Dr. Wierda noted that the E1912 trial also showed superior OS with Ib-R. The 3-year OS rate was 98.8% with Ib-R and 91.5% with FCR (P less than .001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the treatment arms in the A041202 trial or the iLLUMINATE trial.
“But I would argue that is, in part, because of short follow-up,” Dr. Wierda said. “The trials were all designed to look at progression-free survival, not overall survival. With longer follow-up, we may see differences in overall survival emerging.”
Dr. Wierda went on to say that fixed‐duration treatment with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax can improve PFS over CIT.
In the phase 3 CLL14 trial, researchers compared fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL patients with comorbidities. The estimated PFS at 2 years was 88.2% in the venetoclax group and 64.1% in the chlorambucil group (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
“[There was] no difference in overall survival,” Dr. Wierda noted. “But, again, I would argue ... that follow-up is relatively limited. We may ultimately see a difference in overall survival.”
Based on these findings, Dr. Wierda made the following treatment recommendations:
- Any CLL patient with del(17p) or TP53 mutation, and older, unfit patients with unmutated IGHV should receive a BTK inhibitor, with or without obinutuzumab.
- All young, fit patients, and older, unfit patients with mutated IGHV should receive a BCL2 inhibitor plus obinutuzumab.
Dr. Wierda also noted that ibrutinib and venetoclax in combination have shown early promise for patients with previously untreated CLL (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2095-2103).
CIT still has a role as first-line treatment
Dr. Brown suggested that a PFS benefit may not be enough to recommend targeted agents over CIT. For one thing, the PFS benefit doesn’t apply to all patients, as the IGHV-mutated subgroup does equally well with CIT and targeted agents.
In the IGHV-mutated group from the E1912 trial, the 3-year PFS was 88% for patients who received Ib-R and those who received FCR (N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43). In the A041202 study, the 2-year PFS among IGHV-mutated patients was 87% in the BR arm, 86% in the Ib arm, and 88% in the Ib-R arm (N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28).
In the CLL14 trial, PFS rates were similar among IGHV-mutated patients who received chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab and IGHV-mutated or unmutated patients who received venetoclax and obinutuzumab (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
Dr. Brown also noted that the overall improvement in PFS observed with ibrutinib and venetoclax doesn’t always translate to improved OS.
In the A041202 study, there was no significant difference in OS between the Ib, Ib-R, and BR arms (N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28). There was no significant difference in OS between the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms in the iLLUMINATE trial (Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20[1]:43-56). And there was no significant difference in OS between the venetoclax and chlorambucil arms in the CLL14 trial (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
However, in the RESONATE-2 trial, ibrutinib provided an OS benefit over chlorambucil. The 2-year OS was 95% and 84%, respectively (P = .0145; Haematologica. Sept 2018;103:1502-10). Dr. Brown said the OS advantage in this study was due to the “very poor comparator of chlorambucil and very limited crossover.”
As Dr. Wierda mentioned, the OS rate was higher with Ib-R than with FCR in the E1912 trial. The 3-year OS rate was 98.8% and 91.5%, respectively (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43). Dr. Brown noted, however, that there were few deaths in this study, and many of them “were not clearly related to the disease or its treatment.”
Dr. Brown also pointed out that FCR has been shown to have curative potential in IGHV-mutated CLL in both the FCR300 trial (Blood. 2016 127:303-9) and the CLL8 trial (Blood. 2016 127:208-15).
Another factor to consider is the greater cost of targeted agents. One analysis suggested the per-patient lifetime cost of CLL treatment in the United States will increase from $147,000 to $604,000 as targeted therapies overtake CIT as first-line treatment (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35[2]:166-174).
“Given all of the above, chemoimmunotherapy is going to remain part of the treatment repertoire for CLL,” Dr. Brown said. “It’s our only known potential cure for the fit, mutated patients ... and can also result in prolonged treatment-free intervals for patients who are older. As we manage CLL as a chronic disease over a lifetime, we need to continue to have this in our armamentarium.”
Specifically, Dr. Brown said CIT is appropriate for patients who don’t have del(17p) or mutated TP53. FCR should be given to young, fit patients with IGHV-mutated CLL, and FCR or BR should be given to older patients and young, fit patients with IGHV-unmutated CLL.
Dr. Brown and Dr. Wierda reported financial ties to multiple pharmaceutical companies, including makers of CLL treatments.
SAN FRANCISCO – Should targeted agents replace chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)? A recent debate suggests there’s no consensus.
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, debated the topic at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.
Dr. Wierda argued that CLL patients should receive a BTK inhibitor or BCL2 inhibitor, with or without obinutuzumab, as first-line therapy because these targeted agents have been shown to provide better progression-free survival (PFS) than CIT, and the targeted therapies may prolong overall survival (OS) as well.
Dr. Brown countered that targeted agents don’t improve PFS for all CLL patients, improved PFS doesn’t always translate to improved OS, and targeted agents cost more than CIT.
No role for CIT as first-line treatment
“We have two approaches right now, with nonchemoimmunotherapy-based treatment,” Dr. Wierda said. “One approach, with small-molecule inhibitors, is to have a sustained and durable period of disease control, particularly with BTK inhibitors. The other strategy that has emerged is deep remissions with fixed-duration treatment with BCL2 small-molecule inhibitor-based therapy, which, I would argue, is better than being exposed to genotoxic chemoimmunotherapy.”
Dr. Wierda went on to explain that the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been shown to improve PFS, compared with CIT, in phase 3 trials.
In the iLLUMINATE trial, researchers compared ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab as first-line treatment in CLL. At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, the median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 19 months in the chlorambucil arm (P less than .0001; Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20[1]:43-56).
In the A041202 study, researchers compared ibrutinib alone (Ib) or in combination with rituximab (Ib-R) to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in untreated, older patients with CLL. The 2-year PFS estimates were 74% in the BR arm, 87% in the Ib arm, and 88% in the Ib-R arm (P less than .001 for BR vs. Ib or Ib-R; N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28).
In the E1912 trial, researchers compared Ib-R to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in younger, untreated CLL patients. The 3-year PFS was 89.4% with Ib-R and 72.9% with FCR (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43).
Dr. Wierda noted that the E1912 trial also showed superior OS with Ib-R. The 3-year OS rate was 98.8% with Ib-R and 91.5% with FCR (P less than .001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the treatment arms in the A041202 trial or the iLLUMINATE trial.
“But I would argue that is, in part, because of short follow-up,” Dr. Wierda said. “The trials were all designed to look at progression-free survival, not overall survival. With longer follow-up, we may see differences in overall survival emerging.”
Dr. Wierda went on to say that fixed‐duration treatment with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax can improve PFS over CIT.
In the phase 3 CLL14 trial, researchers compared fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL patients with comorbidities. The estimated PFS at 2 years was 88.2% in the venetoclax group and 64.1% in the chlorambucil group (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
“[There was] no difference in overall survival,” Dr. Wierda noted. “But, again, I would argue ... that follow-up is relatively limited. We may ultimately see a difference in overall survival.”
Based on these findings, Dr. Wierda made the following treatment recommendations:
- Any CLL patient with del(17p) or TP53 mutation, and older, unfit patients with unmutated IGHV should receive a BTK inhibitor, with or without obinutuzumab.
- All young, fit patients, and older, unfit patients with mutated IGHV should receive a BCL2 inhibitor plus obinutuzumab.
Dr. Wierda also noted that ibrutinib and venetoclax in combination have shown early promise for patients with previously untreated CLL (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2095-2103).
CIT still has a role as first-line treatment
Dr. Brown suggested that a PFS benefit may not be enough to recommend targeted agents over CIT. For one thing, the PFS benefit doesn’t apply to all patients, as the IGHV-mutated subgroup does equally well with CIT and targeted agents.
In the IGHV-mutated group from the E1912 trial, the 3-year PFS was 88% for patients who received Ib-R and those who received FCR (N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43). In the A041202 study, the 2-year PFS among IGHV-mutated patients was 87% in the BR arm, 86% in the Ib arm, and 88% in the Ib-R arm (N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28).
In the CLL14 trial, PFS rates were similar among IGHV-mutated patients who received chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab and IGHV-mutated or unmutated patients who received venetoclax and obinutuzumab (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
Dr. Brown also noted that the overall improvement in PFS observed with ibrutinib and venetoclax doesn’t always translate to improved OS.
In the A041202 study, there was no significant difference in OS between the Ib, Ib-R, and BR arms (N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28). There was no significant difference in OS between the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms in the iLLUMINATE trial (Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20[1]:43-56). And there was no significant difference in OS between the venetoclax and chlorambucil arms in the CLL14 trial (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
However, in the RESONATE-2 trial, ibrutinib provided an OS benefit over chlorambucil. The 2-year OS was 95% and 84%, respectively (P = .0145; Haematologica. Sept 2018;103:1502-10). Dr. Brown said the OS advantage in this study was due to the “very poor comparator of chlorambucil and very limited crossover.”
As Dr. Wierda mentioned, the OS rate was higher with Ib-R than with FCR in the E1912 trial. The 3-year OS rate was 98.8% and 91.5%, respectively (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43). Dr. Brown noted, however, that there were few deaths in this study, and many of them “were not clearly related to the disease or its treatment.”
Dr. Brown also pointed out that FCR has been shown to have curative potential in IGHV-mutated CLL in both the FCR300 trial (Blood. 2016 127:303-9) and the CLL8 trial (Blood. 2016 127:208-15).
Another factor to consider is the greater cost of targeted agents. One analysis suggested the per-patient lifetime cost of CLL treatment in the United States will increase from $147,000 to $604,000 as targeted therapies overtake CIT as first-line treatment (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35[2]:166-174).
“Given all of the above, chemoimmunotherapy is going to remain part of the treatment repertoire for CLL,” Dr. Brown said. “It’s our only known potential cure for the fit, mutated patients ... and can also result in prolonged treatment-free intervals for patients who are older. As we manage CLL as a chronic disease over a lifetime, we need to continue to have this in our armamentarium.”
Specifically, Dr. Brown said CIT is appropriate for patients who don’t have del(17p) or mutated TP53. FCR should be given to young, fit patients with IGHV-mutated CLL, and FCR or BR should be given to older patients and young, fit patients with IGHV-unmutated CLL.
Dr. Brown and Dr. Wierda reported financial ties to multiple pharmaceutical companies, including makers of CLL treatments.
SAN FRANCISCO – Should targeted agents replace chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) as first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)? A recent debate suggests there’s no consensus.
William G. Wierda, MD, PhD, of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and Jennifer R. Brown, MD, PhD, of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston, debated the topic at the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Hematologic Malignancies Annual Congress.
Dr. Wierda argued that CLL patients should receive a BTK inhibitor or BCL2 inhibitor, with or without obinutuzumab, as first-line therapy because these targeted agents have been shown to provide better progression-free survival (PFS) than CIT, and the targeted therapies may prolong overall survival (OS) as well.
Dr. Brown countered that targeted agents don’t improve PFS for all CLL patients, improved PFS doesn’t always translate to improved OS, and targeted agents cost more than CIT.
No role for CIT as first-line treatment
“We have two approaches right now, with nonchemoimmunotherapy-based treatment,” Dr. Wierda said. “One approach, with small-molecule inhibitors, is to have a sustained and durable period of disease control, particularly with BTK inhibitors. The other strategy that has emerged is deep remissions with fixed-duration treatment with BCL2 small-molecule inhibitor-based therapy, which, I would argue, is better than being exposed to genotoxic chemoimmunotherapy.”
Dr. Wierda went on to explain that the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has been shown to improve PFS, compared with CIT, in phase 3 trials.
In the iLLUMINATE trial, researchers compared ibrutinib plus obinutuzumab to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab as first-line treatment in CLL. At a median follow-up of 31.3 months, the median PFS was not reached in the ibrutinib arm and was 19 months in the chlorambucil arm (P less than .0001; Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20[1]:43-56).
In the A041202 study, researchers compared ibrutinib alone (Ib) or in combination with rituximab (Ib-R) to bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in untreated, older patients with CLL. The 2-year PFS estimates were 74% in the BR arm, 87% in the Ib arm, and 88% in the Ib-R arm (P less than .001 for BR vs. Ib or Ib-R; N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28).
In the E1912 trial, researchers compared Ib-R to fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab (FCR) in younger, untreated CLL patients. The 3-year PFS was 89.4% with Ib-R and 72.9% with FCR (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43).
Dr. Wierda noted that the E1912 trial also showed superior OS with Ib-R. The 3-year OS rate was 98.8% with Ib-R and 91.5% with FCR (P less than .001). However, there was no significant difference in OS between the treatment arms in the A041202 trial or the iLLUMINATE trial.
“But I would argue that is, in part, because of short follow-up,” Dr. Wierda said. “The trials were all designed to look at progression-free survival, not overall survival. With longer follow-up, we may see differences in overall survival emerging.”
Dr. Wierda went on to say that fixed‐duration treatment with the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax can improve PFS over CIT.
In the phase 3 CLL14 trial, researchers compared fixed-duration treatment with venetoclax plus obinutuzumab to chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in previously untreated CLL patients with comorbidities. The estimated PFS at 2 years was 88.2% in the venetoclax group and 64.1% in the chlorambucil group (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
“[There was] no difference in overall survival,” Dr. Wierda noted. “But, again, I would argue ... that follow-up is relatively limited. We may ultimately see a difference in overall survival.”
Based on these findings, Dr. Wierda made the following treatment recommendations:
- Any CLL patient with del(17p) or TP53 mutation, and older, unfit patients with unmutated IGHV should receive a BTK inhibitor, with or without obinutuzumab.
- All young, fit patients, and older, unfit patients with mutated IGHV should receive a BCL2 inhibitor plus obinutuzumab.
Dr. Wierda also noted that ibrutinib and venetoclax in combination have shown early promise for patients with previously untreated CLL (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2095-2103).
CIT still has a role as first-line treatment
Dr. Brown suggested that a PFS benefit may not be enough to recommend targeted agents over CIT. For one thing, the PFS benefit doesn’t apply to all patients, as the IGHV-mutated subgroup does equally well with CIT and targeted agents.
In the IGHV-mutated group from the E1912 trial, the 3-year PFS was 88% for patients who received Ib-R and those who received FCR (N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43). In the A041202 study, the 2-year PFS among IGHV-mutated patients was 87% in the BR arm, 86% in the Ib arm, and 88% in the Ib-R arm (N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28).
In the CLL14 trial, PFS rates were similar among IGHV-mutated patients who received chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab and IGHV-mutated or unmutated patients who received venetoclax and obinutuzumab (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
Dr. Brown also noted that the overall improvement in PFS observed with ibrutinib and venetoclax doesn’t always translate to improved OS.
In the A041202 study, there was no significant difference in OS between the Ib, Ib-R, and BR arms (N Engl J Med. 2018; 379:2517-28). There was no significant difference in OS between the ibrutinib and chlorambucil arms in the iLLUMINATE trial (Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20[1]:43-56). And there was no significant difference in OS between the venetoclax and chlorambucil arms in the CLL14 trial (N Engl J Med. 2019; 380:2225-36).
However, in the RESONATE-2 trial, ibrutinib provided an OS benefit over chlorambucil. The 2-year OS was 95% and 84%, respectively (P = .0145; Haematologica. Sept 2018;103:1502-10). Dr. Brown said the OS advantage in this study was due to the “very poor comparator of chlorambucil and very limited crossover.”
As Dr. Wierda mentioned, the OS rate was higher with Ib-R than with FCR in the E1912 trial. The 3-year OS rate was 98.8% and 91.5%, respectively (P less than .001; N Engl J Med. 2019 Aug 1;381:432-43). Dr. Brown noted, however, that there were few deaths in this study, and many of them “were not clearly related to the disease or its treatment.”
Dr. Brown also pointed out that FCR has been shown to have curative potential in IGHV-mutated CLL in both the FCR300 trial (Blood. 2016 127:303-9) and the CLL8 trial (Blood. 2016 127:208-15).
Another factor to consider is the greater cost of targeted agents. One analysis suggested the per-patient lifetime cost of CLL treatment in the United States will increase from $147,000 to $604,000 as targeted therapies overtake CIT as first-line treatment (J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jan 10;35[2]:166-174).
“Given all of the above, chemoimmunotherapy is going to remain part of the treatment repertoire for CLL,” Dr. Brown said. “It’s our only known potential cure for the fit, mutated patients ... and can also result in prolonged treatment-free intervals for patients who are older. As we manage CLL as a chronic disease over a lifetime, we need to continue to have this in our armamentarium.”
Specifically, Dr. Brown said CIT is appropriate for patients who don’t have del(17p) or mutated TP53. FCR should be given to young, fit patients with IGHV-mutated CLL, and FCR or BR should be given to older patients and young, fit patients with IGHV-unmutated CLL.
Dr. Brown and Dr. Wierda reported financial ties to multiple pharmaceutical companies, including makers of CLL treatments.
REPORTING FROM NCCN HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
Novel cardiac troponin protocol rapidly rules out MI
PARIS – An accelerated rule-out pathway, reliant upon a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test upon presentation to the ED with suspected acute coronary syndrome, reduced length of stay and hospital admission rates without increasing cardiac events at 30 days or 1 year in a major Scottish study.
“We conclude that implementation of this early rule-out pathway is both effective and safe, and adoption of this pathway will have major benefits for patients and health care systems,” Nicholas L. Mills, MBChB, PhD, said in presenting the results of the HiSTORIC (High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin at Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction) trial at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
Indeed, in the Unites States, where more than 20 million people per year present to EDs with suspected ACS, the 3.3-hour reduction in length of stay achieved in the HiSTORIC trial by implementing the accelerated rule-out pathway would add up to a $3.6 billion annual savings in bed occupancy alone, according to Dr. Mills, who is chair of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh.
The HiSTORIC pathway incorporates separate thresholds for risk stratification and diagnosis. This strategy is based on an accumulation of persuasive evidence that the major advantage of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is to rule out MI, rather than to rule it in, Dr. Mills explained.
HiSTORIC was a 2-year, prospective, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial including 31,492 consecutive patients with suspected ACS who presented to seven participating hospitals in Scotland. Patients were randomized, at the hospital level, to one of two management pathways. The control group got a standard guideline-recommended strategy involving high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing upon presentation and again 6-12 hours later, with MI being ruled out if the troponin levels were not above the 99th percentile.
In contrast, the novel early rule-out strategy worked as follows: If the patient presented with at least 2 hours of symptoms and the initial troponin I level was below 5 ng/L, then MI was ruled out and the patient was triaged straightaway for outpatient management. If the level was above the 99th percentile, the patient was admitted for serial testing to be done 6-12 hours after symptom onset. And for an intermediate test result – that is, a troponin level between 5 ng/L and the 99th percentile – patients remained in the ED for retesting 3 hours from the time of presentation, and were subsequently admitted only if their troponin level was rising.
Using the accelerated rule-out strategy, two-thirds of patients were quickly discharged from the ED on the basis of a troponin level below 5 ng/mL, and another 7% were ruled out for MI and discharged from the ED after a 3-hour stay on the basis of their second test.
The primary efficacy outcome was length of stay from initial presentation to the ED to discharge. The duration was 10.1 hours with the guideline-recommended pathway and 6.8 hours with the accelerated rule-out pathway, for a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 3.3-hour difference. Moreover, the proportion of patients discharged directly from the ED without hospital admission increased from 53% to 74%, a 57% jump.
The primary safety outcome was the rate of MI or cardiac death post discharge. The rates at 30 days and 1 year were 0.4% and 2.6%, respectively, in the standard-pathway group, compared with 0.3% and 1.8% with the early rule-out pathway. Those between-group differences favoring the accelerated rule-out pathway weren’t statistically significant, but they provided reassurance that the novel pathway was safe.
Of note, this was the first-ever randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an early rule-out pathway. Other rapid diagnostic pathways are largely based on observational experience and expert opinion, Dr. Mills said.
The assay utilized in the HiSTORIC trial was the Abbott Diagnostics Architect high sensitivity assay. The 5-ng/L threshold for early rule-out was chosen for the trial because an earlier study by Dr. Mills and coinvestigators showed that a level below that cutoff had a 99.6% negative predictive value for MI (Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386[10012]:2481-8)
The early rule-out pathway was deliberately designed to be simple and pragmatic, according to the cardiologist. “One of the most remarkable observations in this trial was the adherence to the pathway. We prespecified three criteria to evaluate this and demonstrated adherence rates of 86%-92% for each of these criteria. This was despite the pathway being implemented in all consecutive patients at seven different hospitals and used by many hundreds of different clinicians.”
Discussant Hugo A. Katus, MD, called the HiSTORIC study “a really urgently needed and very well-conducted trial.”
“There were very consistently low MI and cardiac death rates at 30 days and 1 year. So this really works,” commented Dr. Katus, who is chief of internal medicine and director of the department of cardiovascular medicine at Heidelberg (Germany) University.
“Accelerated rule-out high-sensitivity cardiac troponin protocols are here to stay,” he declared.
However, Dr. Katus voiced a concern: “By early discharge as rule out, are other life-threatening conditions ignored?”
He raised this issue because of what he views as the substantial 1-year all-cause mortality and return-to-hospital rates of 5.8% and 39.2% in the standard-pathway group and 5.2% and 38.9% in the accelerated rule-out patients in HiSTORIC. An accelerated rule-out strategy should not prohibit a careful clinical work-up, he emphasized.
Dr. Mills discussed the results in a video interview.
The HiSTORIC trial was funded by the British Heart Foundation. Dr. Mills reported receiving research grants from Abbott Diagnostics and Siemens.
Simultaneous with Dr. Mills’ presentation of the HiSTORIC trial results at the ESC congress, an earlier study that formed the scientific basis for the investigators’ decision to employ distinct risk stratification and diagnostic thresholds for cardiac troponin testing was published online (Circulation. 2019 Sep 1. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042866). The actual HiSTORIC trial results will be published later.
Dr. Katus reported holding a patent for a cardiac troponin T test and serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk.
PARIS – An accelerated rule-out pathway, reliant upon a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test upon presentation to the ED with suspected acute coronary syndrome, reduced length of stay and hospital admission rates without increasing cardiac events at 30 days or 1 year in a major Scottish study.
“We conclude that implementation of this early rule-out pathway is both effective and safe, and adoption of this pathway will have major benefits for patients and health care systems,” Nicholas L. Mills, MBChB, PhD, said in presenting the results of the HiSTORIC (High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin at Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction) trial at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
Indeed, in the Unites States, where more than 20 million people per year present to EDs with suspected ACS, the 3.3-hour reduction in length of stay achieved in the HiSTORIC trial by implementing the accelerated rule-out pathway would add up to a $3.6 billion annual savings in bed occupancy alone, according to Dr. Mills, who is chair of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh.
The HiSTORIC pathway incorporates separate thresholds for risk stratification and diagnosis. This strategy is based on an accumulation of persuasive evidence that the major advantage of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is to rule out MI, rather than to rule it in, Dr. Mills explained.
HiSTORIC was a 2-year, prospective, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial including 31,492 consecutive patients with suspected ACS who presented to seven participating hospitals in Scotland. Patients were randomized, at the hospital level, to one of two management pathways. The control group got a standard guideline-recommended strategy involving high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing upon presentation and again 6-12 hours later, with MI being ruled out if the troponin levels were not above the 99th percentile.
In contrast, the novel early rule-out strategy worked as follows: If the patient presented with at least 2 hours of symptoms and the initial troponin I level was below 5 ng/L, then MI was ruled out and the patient was triaged straightaway for outpatient management. If the level was above the 99th percentile, the patient was admitted for serial testing to be done 6-12 hours after symptom onset. And for an intermediate test result – that is, a troponin level between 5 ng/L and the 99th percentile – patients remained in the ED for retesting 3 hours from the time of presentation, and were subsequently admitted only if their troponin level was rising.
Using the accelerated rule-out strategy, two-thirds of patients were quickly discharged from the ED on the basis of a troponin level below 5 ng/mL, and another 7% were ruled out for MI and discharged from the ED after a 3-hour stay on the basis of their second test.
The primary efficacy outcome was length of stay from initial presentation to the ED to discharge. The duration was 10.1 hours with the guideline-recommended pathway and 6.8 hours with the accelerated rule-out pathway, for a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 3.3-hour difference. Moreover, the proportion of patients discharged directly from the ED without hospital admission increased from 53% to 74%, a 57% jump.
The primary safety outcome was the rate of MI or cardiac death post discharge. The rates at 30 days and 1 year were 0.4% and 2.6%, respectively, in the standard-pathway group, compared with 0.3% and 1.8% with the early rule-out pathway. Those between-group differences favoring the accelerated rule-out pathway weren’t statistically significant, but they provided reassurance that the novel pathway was safe.
Of note, this was the first-ever randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an early rule-out pathway. Other rapid diagnostic pathways are largely based on observational experience and expert opinion, Dr. Mills said.
The assay utilized in the HiSTORIC trial was the Abbott Diagnostics Architect high sensitivity assay. The 5-ng/L threshold for early rule-out was chosen for the trial because an earlier study by Dr. Mills and coinvestigators showed that a level below that cutoff had a 99.6% negative predictive value for MI (Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386[10012]:2481-8)
The early rule-out pathway was deliberately designed to be simple and pragmatic, according to the cardiologist. “One of the most remarkable observations in this trial was the adherence to the pathway. We prespecified three criteria to evaluate this and demonstrated adherence rates of 86%-92% for each of these criteria. This was despite the pathway being implemented in all consecutive patients at seven different hospitals and used by many hundreds of different clinicians.”
Discussant Hugo A. Katus, MD, called the HiSTORIC study “a really urgently needed and very well-conducted trial.”
“There were very consistently low MI and cardiac death rates at 30 days and 1 year. So this really works,” commented Dr. Katus, who is chief of internal medicine and director of the department of cardiovascular medicine at Heidelberg (Germany) University.
“Accelerated rule-out high-sensitivity cardiac troponin protocols are here to stay,” he declared.
However, Dr. Katus voiced a concern: “By early discharge as rule out, are other life-threatening conditions ignored?”
He raised this issue because of what he views as the substantial 1-year all-cause mortality and return-to-hospital rates of 5.8% and 39.2% in the standard-pathway group and 5.2% and 38.9% in the accelerated rule-out patients in HiSTORIC. An accelerated rule-out strategy should not prohibit a careful clinical work-up, he emphasized.
Dr. Mills discussed the results in a video interview.
The HiSTORIC trial was funded by the British Heart Foundation. Dr. Mills reported receiving research grants from Abbott Diagnostics and Siemens.
Simultaneous with Dr. Mills’ presentation of the HiSTORIC trial results at the ESC congress, an earlier study that formed the scientific basis for the investigators’ decision to employ distinct risk stratification and diagnostic thresholds for cardiac troponin testing was published online (Circulation. 2019 Sep 1. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042866). The actual HiSTORIC trial results will be published later.
Dr. Katus reported holding a patent for a cardiac troponin T test and serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk.
PARIS – An accelerated rule-out pathway, reliant upon a single high-sensitivity cardiac troponin test upon presentation to the ED with suspected acute coronary syndrome, reduced length of stay and hospital admission rates without increasing cardiac events at 30 days or 1 year in a major Scottish study.
“We conclude that implementation of this early rule-out pathway is both effective and safe, and adoption of this pathway will have major benefits for patients and health care systems,” Nicholas L. Mills, MBChB, PhD, said in presenting the results of the HiSTORIC (High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin at Presentation to Rule Out Myocardial Infarction) trial at the annual congress of the European Society of Cardiology.
Indeed, in the Unites States, where more than 20 million people per year present to EDs with suspected ACS, the 3.3-hour reduction in length of stay achieved in the HiSTORIC trial by implementing the accelerated rule-out pathway would add up to a $3.6 billion annual savings in bed occupancy alone, according to Dr. Mills, who is chair of cardiology at the University of Edinburgh.
The HiSTORIC pathway incorporates separate thresholds for risk stratification and diagnosis. This strategy is based on an accumulation of persuasive evidence that the major advantage of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin testing is to rule out MI, rather than to rule it in, Dr. Mills explained.
HiSTORIC was a 2-year, prospective, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized, controlled trial including 31,492 consecutive patients with suspected ACS who presented to seven participating hospitals in Scotland. Patients were randomized, at the hospital level, to one of two management pathways. The control group got a standard guideline-recommended strategy involving high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I testing upon presentation and again 6-12 hours later, with MI being ruled out if the troponin levels were not above the 99th percentile.
In contrast, the novel early rule-out strategy worked as follows: If the patient presented with at least 2 hours of symptoms and the initial troponin I level was below 5 ng/L, then MI was ruled out and the patient was triaged straightaway for outpatient management. If the level was above the 99th percentile, the patient was admitted for serial testing to be done 6-12 hours after symptom onset. And for an intermediate test result – that is, a troponin level between 5 ng/L and the 99th percentile – patients remained in the ED for retesting 3 hours from the time of presentation, and were subsequently admitted only if their troponin level was rising.
Using the accelerated rule-out strategy, two-thirds of patients were quickly discharged from the ED on the basis of a troponin level below 5 ng/mL, and another 7% were ruled out for MI and discharged from the ED after a 3-hour stay on the basis of their second test.
The primary efficacy outcome was length of stay from initial presentation to the ED to discharge. The duration was 10.1 hours with the guideline-recommended pathway and 6.8 hours with the accelerated rule-out pathway, for a statistically significant and clinically meaningful 3.3-hour difference. Moreover, the proportion of patients discharged directly from the ED without hospital admission increased from 53% to 74%, a 57% jump.
The primary safety outcome was the rate of MI or cardiac death post discharge. The rates at 30 days and 1 year were 0.4% and 2.6%, respectively, in the standard-pathway group, compared with 0.3% and 1.8% with the early rule-out pathway. Those between-group differences favoring the accelerated rule-out pathway weren’t statistically significant, but they provided reassurance that the novel pathway was safe.
Of note, this was the first-ever randomized trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an early rule-out pathway. Other rapid diagnostic pathways are largely based on observational experience and expert opinion, Dr. Mills said.
The assay utilized in the HiSTORIC trial was the Abbott Diagnostics Architect high sensitivity assay. The 5-ng/L threshold for early rule-out was chosen for the trial because an earlier study by Dr. Mills and coinvestigators showed that a level below that cutoff had a 99.6% negative predictive value for MI (Lancet. 2015 Dec 19;386[10012]:2481-8)
The early rule-out pathway was deliberately designed to be simple and pragmatic, according to the cardiologist. “One of the most remarkable observations in this trial was the adherence to the pathway. We prespecified three criteria to evaluate this and demonstrated adherence rates of 86%-92% for each of these criteria. This was despite the pathway being implemented in all consecutive patients at seven different hospitals and used by many hundreds of different clinicians.”
Discussant Hugo A. Katus, MD, called the HiSTORIC study “a really urgently needed and very well-conducted trial.”
“There were very consistently low MI and cardiac death rates at 30 days and 1 year. So this really works,” commented Dr. Katus, who is chief of internal medicine and director of the department of cardiovascular medicine at Heidelberg (Germany) University.
“Accelerated rule-out high-sensitivity cardiac troponin protocols are here to stay,” he declared.
However, Dr. Katus voiced a concern: “By early discharge as rule out, are other life-threatening conditions ignored?”
He raised this issue because of what he views as the substantial 1-year all-cause mortality and return-to-hospital rates of 5.8% and 39.2% in the standard-pathway group and 5.2% and 38.9% in the accelerated rule-out patients in HiSTORIC. An accelerated rule-out strategy should not prohibit a careful clinical work-up, he emphasized.
Dr. Mills discussed the results in a video interview.
The HiSTORIC trial was funded by the British Heart Foundation. Dr. Mills reported receiving research grants from Abbott Diagnostics and Siemens.
Simultaneous with Dr. Mills’ presentation of the HiSTORIC trial results at the ESC congress, an earlier study that formed the scientific basis for the investigators’ decision to employ distinct risk stratification and diagnostic thresholds for cardiac troponin testing was published online (Circulation. 2019 Sep 1. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042866). The actual HiSTORIC trial results will be published later.
Dr. Katus reported holding a patent for a cardiac troponin T test and serving as a consultant to AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk.
REPORTING FROM THE ESC CONGRESS 2019
Clinical Pharmacists Improve Patient Outcomes and Expand Access to Care
The US is in the midst of a chronic disease crisis. According to the latest published data available, 60% of Americans have at least 1 chronic condition, and 42% have ≥ 2 chronic conditions.1 Estimates by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) indicate a current shortfall of 13 800 primary care physicians and a projected escalation of that shortage to be between 14 800 and 49 300 physicians by the year 2030.2
The US Public Health Service (USPHS) has used pharmacists since 1930 to provide direct patient care to underserved and vulnerable populations. Clinical pharmacists currently serve in direct patient care roles within the Indian Health Service (IHS), Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the United States Coast Guard (USCG) in many states (Figure). These pharmacists play a vital role in improving access to care and delivering quality care by managing acute and chronic diseases in collaborative practice settings and pharmacist-managed clinics.
It has previously been reported that in the face of physician shortages and growing demand for primary health care providers, pharmacists are well-equipped and motivated to meet this demand.3 A review of the previous 2 years of outcomes reported by clinical pharmacists certified through the USPHS National Clinical Pharmacy Specialist (NCPS) Committee are presented to demonstrate the impact of pharmacists in advancing the health of the populations they serve and to showcase a model for ameliorating the ongoing physician shortage.
Background
The USPHS NCPS Committee serves to promote uniform competency among clinical pharmacists by establishing national standards for protocols, collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), credentialing and privileging of pharmacists, and by collecting, reviewing, and publishing health care outcomes. The committee, whose constituents include pharmacist and physician subject matter experts from across USPHS agencies, reviews applications and protocols and certifies pharmacists (civilian and uniformed) to recognize an advanced scope of practice in managing various diseases and optimizing medication therapy. NCPScertified pharmacists manage a wide spectrum of diseases, including coagulopathy, asthma, diabetes mellitus (DM), hepatitis C, HIV, hypertension, pain, seizure disorders, and tobacco use disorders.
Clinical pharmacists practicing chronic disease management establish a clinical service in collaboration with 1 or more physicians, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners. In this collaborative practice, the health care practitioner(s) refer patients to be managed by a pharmacist for specific medical needs, such as anticoagulation management, or for holistic medication- focused care (eg, cardiovascular risk reduction, DM management, HIV, hepatitis, or mental health). The pharmacist may order and interpret laboratory tests, check vital signs, perform a limited physical examination, and gather other pertinent information from the patient and the medical record in order to provide the best possible care to the patient.
Medications may be started, stopped, or adjusted, education is provided, and therapeutic lifestyle interventions may be recommended. The pharmacist-run clinic provides the patient more frequent interaction with a health care professional (pharmacist) and focused disease management. As a result, pharmacists increase access to care and allow the medical team to handle a larger panel of patients as the practitioner delegates specified diseases to the pharmacist- managed clinic(s). The number of NCPS-certified pharmacists grew 46% from 2012 (n = 230) to 2017 (n = 336), reflecting an evolution of pharmacists’ practice to better meet the need of patients across the nation.
Methods
The NCPS Committee requires NCPS pharmacists to report data annually from all patients referred for pharmacist management for specific diseases in which they have been certified. The data reflect the patient’s clinical outcome goal status at the time of referral as well as the same status at the end of the reporting period or on release from the pharmacist-run clinic. These data describe the impact prescribing pharmacists have on patients reaching clinical outcome goals acting as the team member specializing in the medication selection and dosing aspect of care.
These records were reviewed for the fiscal year (FY) periods of October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 (FY 2016) and October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 (FY 2017). A systematic review of submitted reports resulted in 181 reports that included all requested data points for the disease as published here for FYs 2016 and 2017. These include 66 reports from FY 2016 and 115 reports from FY 2017; they cover 76 BOP and IHS facilities located across 24 states. Table 1 shows the number of outcome reports collected from 104 075 patient visits in pharmacist-run clinics in FYs 2016 and 2017.
Results
The following tables represent the standardized outcomes collected by NCPS-certified pharmacists providing direct patient care. Patients on anticoagulants (eg, warfarin) require special monitoring and education for drug interactions and adverse effects. NCPS-certified pharmacists were able to achieve a mean patient time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 67.6% (regardless of indication) over the 2 years (calculated per each facility by Rosendaal method of linear interpolation then combined in a weighted average per visit). The TTR produced by NCPS-certified pharmacists are consistent with Chest Guidelines and Expert Panel Report suggesting that TTR should be between 65% and 70%.4 Table 2 shows data from 100 reports with 68 255 patient visits for anticoagulation management.
DM management can be complex and time-intensive. NCPS data indicate pharmacist intervention resulted in a mean decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 1.8% from a baseline of 10.2% (decrease calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average per visit). Table 3 shows data from 30 reports with 16 518 patient visits for DM care.
In addition to diet and exercise, medication management plays a vital role in managing hypertension. Patients managed by an NCPS-certified pharmacist experienced a mean decrease in blood pressure from 144/83 to 133/77, putting them in goal for both systolic and diastolic ranges (decrease calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average per visit). Table 4 shows data from 16 reports and 7997 patient visits for treatment of hypertension.
HIV viral suppression is vital in order to best manage patients with HIV and reduce the risk of transmission. Pharmacistled clinics have shown a 32.9% absolute improvement in patients at goal (viral load < 50 copies/mL), from a mean baseline of 46.0% to a mean final assessment of 71.6% of patients at goal (combined by weighted average visits). Table 5 shows data from 6 reports covering 1532 patient encounters for management of HIV.
Nicotine dependence includes the use of cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, and vaping products containing nicotine. NCPS-certified pharmacists have successfully helped patients improve their chance of quitting, with a 6-month quit rate of 22.2% (quit rate calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average by visits), which is higher than the national average of 9.4% as reported by the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention. 5 Table 6 shows 29 reports covering 9773 patient visits for treatment of nicotine dependence.
Discussion
These data demonstrate the ability of advanced practice pharmacists in multiple locations within the federal sector to improve targeted clinical outcomes in patients with varying diseases. These results are strengthened by their varied origins as well as the improvements observed across the board. Limitations include the general lack of a comparable dataset, manual method of selfreporting by the individual facilities, and the relatively limited array of diseases reported. Although NCPS-certified pharmacists are currently providing care for patients with hepatitis C, asthma, seizure, pain and other diseases not reported here, there are insufficient data collected for FYs 2016 and 2017 to merit inclusion within this report.
Pharmacists are trusted, readily available medication experts. In a clinical role, NCPS-certified pharmacists have increased access to primary care services and demonstrated beneficial impact on important health outcomes as exhibited by the data reported above. Clinical pharmacy is a growing field, and NCPS has displayed continual growth in both the number of NCPS-certified pharmacists and the number of patient encounters performed by these providers. As more pharmacists in all settings collaborate with medical providers to offer high-quality clinical care, these providers will have more opportunity to delegate disease management. Continued reporting of clinical pharmacy outcomes is expected to increase confidence in pharmacists as primary care providers, increase utilization of pharmacy clinical services, and assist in easing the burden of primary care provider shortages across our nation.
Although these outcomes indicate demonstrable benefit in patient-centered outcomes, the need for ongoing assessment and continued improvement is not obviated. Future efforts may benefit from a comparison of alternative approaches to better facilitate the establishment of best practices. Alignment of clinical outcomes with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Clinical Quality Measures, where applicable, also may prove beneficial by automating the reporting process and thereby decreasing the burden of reporting as well as providing an avenue for standard comparison across multiple populations. Clinical pharmacy interventions have positive outcomes based on the NCPS model, and the NCPS Committee invites other clinical settings to report outcomes data with which to compare.
Conclusion
The NCPS Committee has documented positive outcomes of clinical pharmacy intervention and anticipates growth of the pharmacy profession as additional states and health systems recognize the capacity of the pharmacist to provide high-quality, multidisciplinary patient care. Clinical pharmacists are prepared to address critical health care needs as the US continues to face a PCP shortage.2 The NCPS Committee challenges those participating in clinical pharmacy practice to report outcomes to amplify this body of evidence.
Acknowledgments
NCPS-certified pharmacists provided the outcomes detailed in this report. For document review and edits: Federal Bureau of Prison Publication Review Workgroup; RADM Ty Bingham, USPHS; CAPT Cindy Gunderson, USPHS; CAPT Kevin Brooks, USPHS.
1. Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp; 2017.
2. Dall T, West T, Chakrabarti R, Reynolds R, Iacobucci W. The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2016 to 2030, 2018 update. Association of American Medical Colleges. March 2018.
3. Giberson S, Yoder S, Lee MP. Improving patient and health system outcomes through advanced pharmacy practice. A report to the U.S. Surgeon General 2011. https://www .accp.com/docs/positions/misc/improving_patient_and _health_system_outcomes.pdf. Updated December 2011. Accessed September 11, 2019.
4. Lip G, Banerjee A, Boriani G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation. CHEST guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2018;154(5):1121-1201.
5. Babb S, Marlarcher A, Schauer G, Asman K, Jamal A. Quitting smoking among adults—United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;65(52):1457-1464.
The US is in the midst of a chronic disease crisis. According to the latest published data available, 60% of Americans have at least 1 chronic condition, and 42% have ≥ 2 chronic conditions.1 Estimates by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) indicate a current shortfall of 13 800 primary care physicians and a projected escalation of that shortage to be between 14 800 and 49 300 physicians by the year 2030.2
The US Public Health Service (USPHS) has used pharmacists since 1930 to provide direct patient care to underserved and vulnerable populations. Clinical pharmacists currently serve in direct patient care roles within the Indian Health Service (IHS), Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the United States Coast Guard (USCG) in many states (Figure). These pharmacists play a vital role in improving access to care and delivering quality care by managing acute and chronic diseases in collaborative practice settings and pharmacist-managed clinics.
It has previously been reported that in the face of physician shortages and growing demand for primary health care providers, pharmacists are well-equipped and motivated to meet this demand.3 A review of the previous 2 years of outcomes reported by clinical pharmacists certified through the USPHS National Clinical Pharmacy Specialist (NCPS) Committee are presented to demonstrate the impact of pharmacists in advancing the health of the populations they serve and to showcase a model for ameliorating the ongoing physician shortage.
Background
The USPHS NCPS Committee serves to promote uniform competency among clinical pharmacists by establishing national standards for protocols, collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), credentialing and privileging of pharmacists, and by collecting, reviewing, and publishing health care outcomes. The committee, whose constituents include pharmacist and physician subject matter experts from across USPHS agencies, reviews applications and protocols and certifies pharmacists (civilian and uniformed) to recognize an advanced scope of practice in managing various diseases and optimizing medication therapy. NCPScertified pharmacists manage a wide spectrum of diseases, including coagulopathy, asthma, diabetes mellitus (DM), hepatitis C, HIV, hypertension, pain, seizure disorders, and tobacco use disorders.
Clinical pharmacists practicing chronic disease management establish a clinical service in collaboration with 1 or more physicians, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners. In this collaborative practice, the health care practitioner(s) refer patients to be managed by a pharmacist for specific medical needs, such as anticoagulation management, or for holistic medication- focused care (eg, cardiovascular risk reduction, DM management, HIV, hepatitis, or mental health). The pharmacist may order and interpret laboratory tests, check vital signs, perform a limited physical examination, and gather other pertinent information from the patient and the medical record in order to provide the best possible care to the patient.
Medications may be started, stopped, or adjusted, education is provided, and therapeutic lifestyle interventions may be recommended. The pharmacist-run clinic provides the patient more frequent interaction with a health care professional (pharmacist) and focused disease management. As a result, pharmacists increase access to care and allow the medical team to handle a larger panel of patients as the practitioner delegates specified diseases to the pharmacist- managed clinic(s). The number of NCPS-certified pharmacists grew 46% from 2012 (n = 230) to 2017 (n = 336), reflecting an evolution of pharmacists’ practice to better meet the need of patients across the nation.
Methods
The NCPS Committee requires NCPS pharmacists to report data annually from all patients referred for pharmacist management for specific diseases in which they have been certified. The data reflect the patient’s clinical outcome goal status at the time of referral as well as the same status at the end of the reporting period or on release from the pharmacist-run clinic. These data describe the impact prescribing pharmacists have on patients reaching clinical outcome goals acting as the team member specializing in the medication selection and dosing aspect of care.
These records were reviewed for the fiscal year (FY) periods of October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 (FY 2016) and October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 (FY 2017). A systematic review of submitted reports resulted in 181 reports that included all requested data points for the disease as published here for FYs 2016 and 2017. These include 66 reports from FY 2016 and 115 reports from FY 2017; they cover 76 BOP and IHS facilities located across 24 states. Table 1 shows the number of outcome reports collected from 104 075 patient visits in pharmacist-run clinics in FYs 2016 and 2017.
Results
The following tables represent the standardized outcomes collected by NCPS-certified pharmacists providing direct patient care. Patients on anticoagulants (eg, warfarin) require special monitoring and education for drug interactions and adverse effects. NCPS-certified pharmacists were able to achieve a mean patient time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 67.6% (regardless of indication) over the 2 years (calculated per each facility by Rosendaal method of linear interpolation then combined in a weighted average per visit). The TTR produced by NCPS-certified pharmacists are consistent with Chest Guidelines and Expert Panel Report suggesting that TTR should be between 65% and 70%.4 Table 2 shows data from 100 reports with 68 255 patient visits for anticoagulation management.
DM management can be complex and time-intensive. NCPS data indicate pharmacist intervention resulted in a mean decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 1.8% from a baseline of 10.2% (decrease calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average per visit). Table 3 shows data from 30 reports with 16 518 patient visits for DM care.
In addition to diet and exercise, medication management plays a vital role in managing hypertension. Patients managed by an NCPS-certified pharmacist experienced a mean decrease in blood pressure from 144/83 to 133/77, putting them in goal for both systolic and diastolic ranges (decrease calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average per visit). Table 4 shows data from 16 reports and 7997 patient visits for treatment of hypertension.
HIV viral suppression is vital in order to best manage patients with HIV and reduce the risk of transmission. Pharmacistled clinics have shown a 32.9% absolute improvement in patients at goal (viral load < 50 copies/mL), from a mean baseline of 46.0% to a mean final assessment of 71.6% of patients at goal (combined by weighted average visits). Table 5 shows data from 6 reports covering 1532 patient encounters for management of HIV.
Nicotine dependence includes the use of cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, and vaping products containing nicotine. NCPS-certified pharmacists have successfully helped patients improve their chance of quitting, with a 6-month quit rate of 22.2% (quit rate calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average by visits), which is higher than the national average of 9.4% as reported by the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention. 5 Table 6 shows 29 reports covering 9773 patient visits for treatment of nicotine dependence.
Discussion
These data demonstrate the ability of advanced practice pharmacists in multiple locations within the federal sector to improve targeted clinical outcomes in patients with varying diseases. These results are strengthened by their varied origins as well as the improvements observed across the board. Limitations include the general lack of a comparable dataset, manual method of selfreporting by the individual facilities, and the relatively limited array of diseases reported. Although NCPS-certified pharmacists are currently providing care for patients with hepatitis C, asthma, seizure, pain and other diseases not reported here, there are insufficient data collected for FYs 2016 and 2017 to merit inclusion within this report.
Pharmacists are trusted, readily available medication experts. In a clinical role, NCPS-certified pharmacists have increased access to primary care services and demonstrated beneficial impact on important health outcomes as exhibited by the data reported above. Clinical pharmacy is a growing field, and NCPS has displayed continual growth in both the number of NCPS-certified pharmacists and the number of patient encounters performed by these providers. As more pharmacists in all settings collaborate with medical providers to offer high-quality clinical care, these providers will have more opportunity to delegate disease management. Continued reporting of clinical pharmacy outcomes is expected to increase confidence in pharmacists as primary care providers, increase utilization of pharmacy clinical services, and assist in easing the burden of primary care provider shortages across our nation.
Although these outcomes indicate demonstrable benefit in patient-centered outcomes, the need for ongoing assessment and continued improvement is not obviated. Future efforts may benefit from a comparison of alternative approaches to better facilitate the establishment of best practices. Alignment of clinical outcomes with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Clinical Quality Measures, where applicable, also may prove beneficial by automating the reporting process and thereby decreasing the burden of reporting as well as providing an avenue for standard comparison across multiple populations. Clinical pharmacy interventions have positive outcomes based on the NCPS model, and the NCPS Committee invites other clinical settings to report outcomes data with which to compare.
Conclusion
The NCPS Committee has documented positive outcomes of clinical pharmacy intervention and anticipates growth of the pharmacy profession as additional states and health systems recognize the capacity of the pharmacist to provide high-quality, multidisciplinary patient care. Clinical pharmacists are prepared to address critical health care needs as the US continues to face a PCP shortage.2 The NCPS Committee challenges those participating in clinical pharmacy practice to report outcomes to amplify this body of evidence.
Acknowledgments
NCPS-certified pharmacists provided the outcomes detailed in this report. For document review and edits: Federal Bureau of Prison Publication Review Workgroup; RADM Ty Bingham, USPHS; CAPT Cindy Gunderson, USPHS; CAPT Kevin Brooks, USPHS.
The US is in the midst of a chronic disease crisis. According to the latest published data available, 60% of Americans have at least 1 chronic condition, and 42% have ≥ 2 chronic conditions.1 Estimates by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) indicate a current shortfall of 13 800 primary care physicians and a projected escalation of that shortage to be between 14 800 and 49 300 physicians by the year 2030.2
The US Public Health Service (USPHS) has used pharmacists since 1930 to provide direct patient care to underserved and vulnerable populations. Clinical pharmacists currently serve in direct patient care roles within the Indian Health Service (IHS), Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and the United States Coast Guard (USCG) in many states (Figure). These pharmacists play a vital role in improving access to care and delivering quality care by managing acute and chronic diseases in collaborative practice settings and pharmacist-managed clinics.
It has previously been reported that in the face of physician shortages and growing demand for primary health care providers, pharmacists are well-equipped and motivated to meet this demand.3 A review of the previous 2 years of outcomes reported by clinical pharmacists certified through the USPHS National Clinical Pharmacy Specialist (NCPS) Committee are presented to demonstrate the impact of pharmacists in advancing the health of the populations they serve and to showcase a model for ameliorating the ongoing physician shortage.
Background
The USPHS NCPS Committee serves to promote uniform competency among clinical pharmacists by establishing national standards for protocols, collaborative practice agreements (CPAs), credentialing and privileging of pharmacists, and by collecting, reviewing, and publishing health care outcomes. The committee, whose constituents include pharmacist and physician subject matter experts from across USPHS agencies, reviews applications and protocols and certifies pharmacists (civilian and uniformed) to recognize an advanced scope of practice in managing various diseases and optimizing medication therapy. NCPScertified pharmacists manage a wide spectrum of diseases, including coagulopathy, asthma, diabetes mellitus (DM), hepatitis C, HIV, hypertension, pain, seizure disorders, and tobacco use disorders.
Clinical pharmacists practicing chronic disease management establish a clinical service in collaboration with 1 or more physicians, physician assistants, or nurse practitioners. In this collaborative practice, the health care practitioner(s) refer patients to be managed by a pharmacist for specific medical needs, such as anticoagulation management, or for holistic medication- focused care (eg, cardiovascular risk reduction, DM management, HIV, hepatitis, or mental health). The pharmacist may order and interpret laboratory tests, check vital signs, perform a limited physical examination, and gather other pertinent information from the patient and the medical record in order to provide the best possible care to the patient.
Medications may be started, stopped, or adjusted, education is provided, and therapeutic lifestyle interventions may be recommended. The pharmacist-run clinic provides the patient more frequent interaction with a health care professional (pharmacist) and focused disease management. As a result, pharmacists increase access to care and allow the medical team to handle a larger panel of patients as the practitioner delegates specified diseases to the pharmacist- managed clinic(s). The number of NCPS-certified pharmacists grew 46% from 2012 (n = 230) to 2017 (n = 336), reflecting an evolution of pharmacists’ practice to better meet the need of patients across the nation.
Methods
The NCPS Committee requires NCPS pharmacists to report data annually from all patients referred for pharmacist management for specific diseases in which they have been certified. The data reflect the patient’s clinical outcome goal status at the time of referral as well as the same status at the end of the reporting period or on release from the pharmacist-run clinic. These data describe the impact prescribing pharmacists have on patients reaching clinical outcome goals acting as the team member specializing in the medication selection and dosing aspect of care.
These records were reviewed for the fiscal year (FY) periods of October 1, 2015 to September 30, 2016 (FY 2016) and October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017 (FY 2017). A systematic review of submitted reports resulted in 181 reports that included all requested data points for the disease as published here for FYs 2016 and 2017. These include 66 reports from FY 2016 and 115 reports from FY 2017; they cover 76 BOP and IHS facilities located across 24 states. Table 1 shows the number of outcome reports collected from 104 075 patient visits in pharmacist-run clinics in FYs 2016 and 2017.
Results
The following tables represent the standardized outcomes collected by NCPS-certified pharmacists providing direct patient care. Patients on anticoagulants (eg, warfarin) require special monitoring and education for drug interactions and adverse effects. NCPS-certified pharmacists were able to achieve a mean patient time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 67.6% (regardless of indication) over the 2 years (calculated per each facility by Rosendaal method of linear interpolation then combined in a weighted average per visit). The TTR produced by NCPS-certified pharmacists are consistent with Chest Guidelines and Expert Panel Report suggesting that TTR should be between 65% and 70%.4 Table 2 shows data from 100 reports with 68 255 patient visits for anticoagulation management.
DM management can be complex and time-intensive. NCPS data indicate pharmacist intervention resulted in a mean decrease in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 1.8% from a baseline of 10.2% (decrease calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average per visit). Table 3 shows data from 30 reports with 16 518 patient visits for DM care.
In addition to diet and exercise, medication management plays a vital role in managing hypertension. Patients managed by an NCPS-certified pharmacist experienced a mean decrease in blood pressure from 144/83 to 133/77, putting them in goal for both systolic and diastolic ranges (decrease calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average per visit). Table 4 shows data from 16 reports and 7997 patient visits for treatment of hypertension.
HIV viral suppression is vital in order to best manage patients with HIV and reduce the risk of transmission. Pharmacistled clinics have shown a 32.9% absolute improvement in patients at goal (viral load < 50 copies/mL), from a mean baseline of 46.0% to a mean final assessment of 71.6% of patients at goal (combined by weighted average visits). Table 5 shows data from 6 reports covering 1532 patient encounters for management of HIV.
Nicotine dependence includes the use of cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco, chewing tobacco, and vaping products containing nicotine. NCPS-certified pharmacists have successfully helped patients improve their chance of quitting, with a 6-month quit rate of 22.2% (quit rate calculated per each facility then combined by weighted average by visits), which is higher than the national average of 9.4% as reported by the Centers for Disease and Control and Prevention. 5 Table 6 shows 29 reports covering 9773 patient visits for treatment of nicotine dependence.
Discussion
These data demonstrate the ability of advanced practice pharmacists in multiple locations within the federal sector to improve targeted clinical outcomes in patients with varying diseases. These results are strengthened by their varied origins as well as the improvements observed across the board. Limitations include the general lack of a comparable dataset, manual method of selfreporting by the individual facilities, and the relatively limited array of diseases reported. Although NCPS-certified pharmacists are currently providing care for patients with hepatitis C, asthma, seizure, pain and other diseases not reported here, there are insufficient data collected for FYs 2016 and 2017 to merit inclusion within this report.
Pharmacists are trusted, readily available medication experts. In a clinical role, NCPS-certified pharmacists have increased access to primary care services and demonstrated beneficial impact on important health outcomes as exhibited by the data reported above. Clinical pharmacy is a growing field, and NCPS has displayed continual growth in both the number of NCPS-certified pharmacists and the number of patient encounters performed by these providers. As more pharmacists in all settings collaborate with medical providers to offer high-quality clinical care, these providers will have more opportunity to delegate disease management. Continued reporting of clinical pharmacy outcomes is expected to increase confidence in pharmacists as primary care providers, increase utilization of pharmacy clinical services, and assist in easing the burden of primary care provider shortages across our nation.
Although these outcomes indicate demonstrable benefit in patient-centered outcomes, the need for ongoing assessment and continued improvement is not obviated. Future efforts may benefit from a comparison of alternative approaches to better facilitate the establishment of best practices. Alignment of clinical outcomes with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Clinical Quality Measures, where applicable, also may prove beneficial by automating the reporting process and thereby decreasing the burden of reporting as well as providing an avenue for standard comparison across multiple populations. Clinical pharmacy interventions have positive outcomes based on the NCPS model, and the NCPS Committee invites other clinical settings to report outcomes data with which to compare.
Conclusion
The NCPS Committee has documented positive outcomes of clinical pharmacy intervention and anticipates growth of the pharmacy profession as additional states and health systems recognize the capacity of the pharmacist to provide high-quality, multidisciplinary patient care. Clinical pharmacists are prepared to address critical health care needs as the US continues to face a PCP shortage.2 The NCPS Committee challenges those participating in clinical pharmacy practice to report outcomes to amplify this body of evidence.
Acknowledgments
NCPS-certified pharmacists provided the outcomes detailed in this report. For document review and edits: Federal Bureau of Prison Publication Review Workgroup; RADM Ty Bingham, USPHS; CAPT Cindy Gunderson, USPHS; CAPT Kevin Brooks, USPHS.
1. Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp; 2017.
2. Dall T, West T, Chakrabarti R, Reynolds R, Iacobucci W. The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2016 to 2030, 2018 update. Association of American Medical Colleges. March 2018.
3. Giberson S, Yoder S, Lee MP. Improving patient and health system outcomes through advanced pharmacy practice. A report to the U.S. Surgeon General 2011. https://www .accp.com/docs/positions/misc/improving_patient_and _health_system_outcomes.pdf. Updated December 2011. Accessed September 11, 2019.
4. Lip G, Banerjee A, Boriani G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation. CHEST guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2018;154(5):1121-1201.
5. Babb S, Marlarcher A, Schauer G, Asman K, Jamal A. Quitting smoking among adults—United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;65(52):1457-1464.
1. Buttorff C, Ruder T, Bauman M. Multiple Chronic Conditions in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp; 2017.
2. Dall T, West T, Chakrabarti R, Reynolds R, Iacobucci W. The complexities of physician supply and demand: projections from 2016 to 2030, 2018 update. Association of American Medical Colleges. March 2018.
3. Giberson S, Yoder S, Lee MP. Improving patient and health system outcomes through advanced pharmacy practice. A report to the U.S. Surgeon General 2011. https://www .accp.com/docs/positions/misc/improving_patient_and _health_system_outcomes.pdf. Updated December 2011. Accessed September 11, 2019.
4. Lip G, Banerjee A, Boriani G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation. CHEST guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2018;154(5):1121-1201.
5. Babb S, Marlarcher A, Schauer G, Asman K, Jamal A. Quitting smoking among adults—United States, 2000-2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017;65(52):1457-1464.
Osteoporosis remains a costly burden to older U.S. adults
ORLANDO – The burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the United States remains high, particularly in older women and minorities, according to a speaker at the annual meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
For non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic white, and Hispanic patients of various ethnic groups, as well as in women and older patients, osteoporosis and fragility fractures continue to be a problem, said Nicole C. Wright, PhD, MPH, of the department of epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
“It remains costly; it remains associated with more health care utilization,” Dr. Wright said. “We may be seeing some declines in some fragility fractures, but [we] are seeing increases in hip fractures.”
As part of the fourth edition of the U.S. Bone and Joint Initiative publication, “The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States,” Dr. Wright and colleagues examined the changes in osteoporosis burden between the third and fourth editions of the publication. They used data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in 2013 and 2014 as well as the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) of national ED visits regardless of hospital admission status. In both databases, researchers analyzed data from adults aged 50 years or older where the primary discharge ICD-9 or ICD-10 code was a diagnosis of fracture.
Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, the researchers estimated an 11.0% osteoporosis prevalence for adults aged 50 years or older overall, a 16.5% prevalence in women, and a 5.1% prevalence in men as assessed by femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density. Osteoporosis was most prevalent in Asian women (40.0%) and Asian men (7.5%), while there was a difference in prevalence in patients of Hispanic race depending on their origin; for example, Puerto Rican men had a higher prevalence of osteoporosis at 8.6%, compared with Hispanic men (2.3%) and non-Hispanic white men of other races (3.9%).
Of 19.5 million hospitalizations in the NIS database between 2013 and 2014, there were approximately 540,000 fragility fractures (2.8%), of which about 300,000 were hip fractures and about 100,000 discharges were for spine fractures, Dr. Wright said. In the NEDS database, the estimate of fragility fracture prevalence was 0.9% of 46.7 million ED visits between 2013 and 2014. Fracture prevalence was increased in women and in older age, with patients aged 80 years or older and those of non-Hispanic white race having the highest prevalence of hip fracture. However, she noted that NEDS data also showed higher prevalences of wrist and humerus fractures, which are not normally fractures that a patient visits the hospital as an inpatient for. “We need both data sets to ascertain fractures in the United States,” she said.
When examining fracture site trends over time, Dr. Wright and colleagues found hip fracture prevalence increased by 3.5% between 2010 and 2014, while there was a decrease of 11.9% in the prevalence of spine fractures over the same time period.
According to data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, the direct cost of osteoporosis in aggregate was $73.6 billion between 2012 and 2014, which was 118% higher than between 1998 and 2000 when the costs were $28.1 billion. The costs were spread across ambulatory care, inpatient, and prescription costs equally, the researchers said.
Although the study was limited by examining fracture prevalence rather than incidence, the potential for missing some fractures based on methodology, and limited patient characteristics and follow-up information, the goal of the presentation was to highlight the new osteoporosis prevalence data and the continued burden of the disease.
“We hope that these new prevalence estimates continue to increase the awareness of osteoporosis and prevention,” she said.
Dr. Wright reported receiving grants from Amgen and serving as an expert witness for the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright and Pfizer.
SOURCE: Wright NC et al. ASBMR 2019, Abstract 1079.
ORLANDO – The burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the United States remains high, particularly in older women and minorities, according to a speaker at the annual meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
For non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic white, and Hispanic patients of various ethnic groups, as well as in women and older patients, osteoporosis and fragility fractures continue to be a problem, said Nicole C. Wright, PhD, MPH, of the department of epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
“It remains costly; it remains associated with more health care utilization,” Dr. Wright said. “We may be seeing some declines in some fragility fractures, but [we] are seeing increases in hip fractures.”
As part of the fourth edition of the U.S. Bone and Joint Initiative publication, “The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States,” Dr. Wright and colleagues examined the changes in osteoporosis burden between the third and fourth editions of the publication. They used data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in 2013 and 2014 as well as the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) of national ED visits regardless of hospital admission status. In both databases, researchers analyzed data from adults aged 50 years or older where the primary discharge ICD-9 or ICD-10 code was a diagnosis of fracture.
Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, the researchers estimated an 11.0% osteoporosis prevalence for adults aged 50 years or older overall, a 16.5% prevalence in women, and a 5.1% prevalence in men as assessed by femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density. Osteoporosis was most prevalent in Asian women (40.0%) and Asian men (7.5%), while there was a difference in prevalence in patients of Hispanic race depending on their origin; for example, Puerto Rican men had a higher prevalence of osteoporosis at 8.6%, compared with Hispanic men (2.3%) and non-Hispanic white men of other races (3.9%).
Of 19.5 million hospitalizations in the NIS database between 2013 and 2014, there were approximately 540,000 fragility fractures (2.8%), of which about 300,000 were hip fractures and about 100,000 discharges were for spine fractures, Dr. Wright said. In the NEDS database, the estimate of fragility fracture prevalence was 0.9% of 46.7 million ED visits between 2013 and 2014. Fracture prevalence was increased in women and in older age, with patients aged 80 years or older and those of non-Hispanic white race having the highest prevalence of hip fracture. However, she noted that NEDS data also showed higher prevalences of wrist and humerus fractures, which are not normally fractures that a patient visits the hospital as an inpatient for. “We need both data sets to ascertain fractures in the United States,” she said.
When examining fracture site trends over time, Dr. Wright and colleagues found hip fracture prevalence increased by 3.5% between 2010 and 2014, while there was a decrease of 11.9% in the prevalence of spine fractures over the same time period.
According to data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, the direct cost of osteoporosis in aggregate was $73.6 billion between 2012 and 2014, which was 118% higher than between 1998 and 2000 when the costs were $28.1 billion. The costs were spread across ambulatory care, inpatient, and prescription costs equally, the researchers said.
Although the study was limited by examining fracture prevalence rather than incidence, the potential for missing some fractures based on methodology, and limited patient characteristics and follow-up information, the goal of the presentation was to highlight the new osteoporosis prevalence data and the continued burden of the disease.
“We hope that these new prevalence estimates continue to increase the awareness of osteoporosis and prevention,” she said.
Dr. Wright reported receiving grants from Amgen and serving as an expert witness for the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright and Pfizer.
SOURCE: Wright NC et al. ASBMR 2019, Abstract 1079.
ORLANDO – The burden of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in the United States remains high, particularly in older women and minorities, according to a speaker at the annual meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
For non-Hispanic Asian, non-Hispanic white, and Hispanic patients of various ethnic groups, as well as in women and older patients, osteoporosis and fragility fractures continue to be a problem, said Nicole C. Wright, PhD, MPH, of the department of epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
“It remains costly; it remains associated with more health care utilization,” Dr. Wright said. “We may be seeing some declines in some fragility fractures, but [we] are seeing increases in hip fractures.”
As part of the fourth edition of the U.S. Bone and Joint Initiative publication, “The Burden of Musculoskeletal Diseases in the United States,” Dr. Wright and colleagues examined the changes in osteoporosis burden between the third and fourth editions of the publication. They used data from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in 2013 and 2014 as well as the National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) of national ED visits regardless of hospital admission status. In both databases, researchers analyzed data from adults aged 50 years or older where the primary discharge ICD-9 or ICD-10 code was a diagnosis of fracture.
Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, the researchers estimated an 11.0% osteoporosis prevalence for adults aged 50 years or older overall, a 16.5% prevalence in women, and a 5.1% prevalence in men as assessed by femoral neck and lumbar spine bone mineral density. Osteoporosis was most prevalent in Asian women (40.0%) and Asian men (7.5%), while there was a difference in prevalence in patients of Hispanic race depending on their origin; for example, Puerto Rican men had a higher prevalence of osteoporosis at 8.6%, compared with Hispanic men (2.3%) and non-Hispanic white men of other races (3.9%).
Of 19.5 million hospitalizations in the NIS database between 2013 and 2014, there were approximately 540,000 fragility fractures (2.8%), of which about 300,000 were hip fractures and about 100,000 discharges were for spine fractures, Dr. Wright said. In the NEDS database, the estimate of fragility fracture prevalence was 0.9% of 46.7 million ED visits between 2013 and 2014. Fracture prevalence was increased in women and in older age, with patients aged 80 years or older and those of non-Hispanic white race having the highest prevalence of hip fracture. However, she noted that NEDS data also showed higher prevalences of wrist and humerus fractures, which are not normally fractures that a patient visits the hospital as an inpatient for. “We need both data sets to ascertain fractures in the United States,” she said.
When examining fracture site trends over time, Dr. Wright and colleagues found hip fracture prevalence increased by 3.5% between 2010 and 2014, while there was a decrease of 11.9% in the prevalence of spine fractures over the same time period.
According to data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey, the direct cost of osteoporosis in aggregate was $73.6 billion between 2012 and 2014, which was 118% higher than between 1998 and 2000 when the costs were $28.1 billion. The costs were spread across ambulatory care, inpatient, and prescription costs equally, the researchers said.
Although the study was limited by examining fracture prevalence rather than incidence, the potential for missing some fractures based on methodology, and limited patient characteristics and follow-up information, the goal of the presentation was to highlight the new osteoporosis prevalence data and the continued burden of the disease.
“We hope that these new prevalence estimates continue to increase the awareness of osteoporosis and prevention,” she said.
Dr. Wright reported receiving grants from Amgen and serving as an expert witness for the law firm Norton Rose Fulbright and Pfizer.
SOURCE: Wright NC et al. ASBMR 2019, Abstract 1079.
REPORTING FROM ASBMR 2019
Guttate Psoriasis Following Presumed Coxsackievirus A
There are 4 variants of psoriasis: plaque, guttate, pustular, and erythroderma (in order of prevalence).2 Guttate psoriasis is characterized by small, 2- to 10-mm, raindroplike lesions on the skin.1 It accounts for approximately 2% of total psoriasis cases and is commonly triggered by group A streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis.3,4
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is an illness most commonly caused by a coxsackievirus A infection but also can be caused by other enteroviruses.5,6 Coxsackievirus is a serotype of the Enterovirus species within the Picornaviridae family.7 Hand-foot-and-mouth disease is characterized by a brief fever and vesicular rashes on the palms, soles, or buttocks, as well as oropharyngeal ulcers.8 Typically, the rash is benign and short-lived.9 In rare cases, neurologic complications develop. There have been no reported cases of guttate psoriasis following a coxsackievirus A infection.
The involvement of coxsackievirus B in the etiopathogenesis of psoriasis has been previously reported.10 We report the case of guttate psoriasis following presumed coxsackievirus A HFMD.
Case Report
A 56-year-old woman presented with a vesicular rash on the hands, feet, and lips. The patient reported having a sore throat that started around the same time that the rash developed. The severity of the sore throat was rated as moderate. No fever was reported. One day prior, the patient’s primary care physician prescribed a tapered course of prednisone for the rash. The patient reported a medical history of herpes zoster virus, sunburn, and genital herpes. She was taking clonazepam and had a known allergy to penicillin.
Physical examination revealed erythematous vesicular and papular lesions on the extensor surfaces of the hands and feet. Vesicles also were noted on the vermilion border of the lip. Examination of the patient’s mouth showed blisters and shallow ulcerations in the oral cavity. A clinical diagnosis of coxsackievirus A HFMD was made, and the treatment plan included triamcinolone acetonide ointment 0.025% applied twice daily for 2 weeks and oral valacyclovir hydrochloride 1 g taken 3 times daily for 7 days. A topical emollient also was recommended for the lips when necessary. The lesions all resolved within a 2-week period with no sequela.
The patient returned 1 month later, citing newer red abdominal skin lesions. Fever was denied. She reported that both prescribed treatments had not been helping for the newer lesions. She noticed similar lesions on the groin and brought them to the attention of her gynecologist. Physical examination revealed salmon pink papules and plaques with silvery scaling involving the abdomen, bilateral upper extremities and ears, and scalp. The patient was then clinically diagnosed with guttate psoriasis. A shave biopsy of a representative lesion on the abdomen was performed. The treatment plan included betamethasone dipropionate cream 0.05% applied twice daily for 2 weeks, clobetasol propionate solution 0.05% applied twice daily for 14 days (for the scalp), and hydrocortisone valerate cream 0.2% applied twice daily for 14 days (for the groin).
The skin biopsy shown in the Figure was received in 10% buffered formalin, measuring 5×4×1 mm of skin. Sections showed an acanthotic epidermis with foci of spongiosis and hypergranulosis covered by mounds of parakeratosis infiltrated by neutrophils. Superficial perivascular and interstitial lymphocytic inflammation was present. Tortuous blood vessels within the papillary dermis also were present. Results showed psoriasiform dermatitis with mild spongiosis. Periodic acid–Schiff stain did not reveal any fungal organisms. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of guttate psoriasis.
The patient then returned 1 month later mentioning continued flare-ups of the scalp as well as newer patches on the arms and hands that were less eruptive and faded more quickly. The plaques in the groin area had resolved. Physical examination showed fewer pink papules and plaques with silvery scaling on the abdomen, bilateral upper extremities and ears, and scalp. Topical medications were continued, and possible apremilast therapy for the psoriasis was discussed.
Comment
Enterovirus-derived HFMD likely is caused by coxsackie-virus A. Current evidence supports the theory that guttate psoriasis can be environmentally triggered in genetically susceptible individuals, often but not exclusively by a streptococcal infection. The causative agent elicits a T-cell–mediated reaction leading to increased type 1 helper T cells, IFN-γ, and IL-2 cytokine levels. HLA-Cw∗0602–positive patients are considered genetically susceptible and more likely to develop guttate psoriasis following an environmental trigger. Based on the coincidence in timing of both diagnoses, this reported case of guttate psoriasis may have been triggered by a coxsackievirus A infection.
- Langley RG, Krueger GG, Griffiths CE. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(suppl 2):ii18-ii23.
- Sarac G, Koca TT, Baglan T. A brief summary of clinical types of psoriasis. North Clin Istanb. 2016;1:79-82.
- Prinz JC. Psoriasis vulgaris—a sterile antibacterial skin reaction mediated by cross-reactive T cells? an immunological view of the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:326-332.
- Telfer N, Chalmers RJ, Whale K, et al. The role of streptococcal infection in the initiation of guttate psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:39-42.
- Cabrerizo M, Tarragó D, Muñoz-Almagro C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of enterovirus 71, coxsackievirus A16 and A6 associated with hand, foot and mouth disease in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O150-O156.
- Li Y, Chang Z, Wu P, et al. Emerging enteroviruses causing hand, foot and mouth disease, China, 2010-2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1902-1906.
- Seitsonen J, Shakeel S, Susi P, et al. Structural analysis of coxsackievirus A7 reveals conformational changes associated with uncoating. J Virol. 2012;86:7207-7215.
- Wu Y, Yeo A, Phoon M, et al. The largest outbreak of hand; foot and mouth disease in Singapore in 2008: the role of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A strains. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E1076-E1081.
- Tesini BL. Hand-foot-and-mouth-disease (HFMD). May 2018. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/enteroviruses/hand-foot-and-mouth-disease-hfmd. Accessed September 25, 2019.
- Korzhova TP, Shyrobokov VP, Koliadenko VH, et al. Coxsackie B viral infection in the etiology and clinical pathogenesis of psoriasis [in Ukrainian]. Lik Sprava. 2001:54-58.
There are 4 variants of psoriasis: plaque, guttate, pustular, and erythroderma (in order of prevalence).2 Guttate psoriasis is characterized by small, 2- to 10-mm, raindroplike lesions on the skin.1 It accounts for approximately 2% of total psoriasis cases and is commonly triggered by group A streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis.3,4
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is an illness most commonly caused by a coxsackievirus A infection but also can be caused by other enteroviruses.5,6 Coxsackievirus is a serotype of the Enterovirus species within the Picornaviridae family.7 Hand-foot-and-mouth disease is characterized by a brief fever and vesicular rashes on the palms, soles, or buttocks, as well as oropharyngeal ulcers.8 Typically, the rash is benign and short-lived.9 In rare cases, neurologic complications develop. There have been no reported cases of guttate psoriasis following a coxsackievirus A infection.
The involvement of coxsackievirus B in the etiopathogenesis of psoriasis has been previously reported.10 We report the case of guttate psoriasis following presumed coxsackievirus A HFMD.
Case Report
A 56-year-old woman presented with a vesicular rash on the hands, feet, and lips. The patient reported having a sore throat that started around the same time that the rash developed. The severity of the sore throat was rated as moderate. No fever was reported. One day prior, the patient’s primary care physician prescribed a tapered course of prednisone for the rash. The patient reported a medical history of herpes zoster virus, sunburn, and genital herpes. She was taking clonazepam and had a known allergy to penicillin.
Physical examination revealed erythematous vesicular and papular lesions on the extensor surfaces of the hands and feet. Vesicles also were noted on the vermilion border of the lip. Examination of the patient’s mouth showed blisters and shallow ulcerations in the oral cavity. A clinical diagnosis of coxsackievirus A HFMD was made, and the treatment plan included triamcinolone acetonide ointment 0.025% applied twice daily for 2 weeks and oral valacyclovir hydrochloride 1 g taken 3 times daily for 7 days. A topical emollient also was recommended for the lips when necessary. The lesions all resolved within a 2-week period with no sequela.
The patient returned 1 month later, citing newer red abdominal skin lesions. Fever was denied. She reported that both prescribed treatments had not been helping for the newer lesions. She noticed similar lesions on the groin and brought them to the attention of her gynecologist. Physical examination revealed salmon pink papules and plaques with silvery scaling involving the abdomen, bilateral upper extremities and ears, and scalp. The patient was then clinically diagnosed with guttate psoriasis. A shave biopsy of a representative lesion on the abdomen was performed. The treatment plan included betamethasone dipropionate cream 0.05% applied twice daily for 2 weeks, clobetasol propionate solution 0.05% applied twice daily for 14 days (for the scalp), and hydrocortisone valerate cream 0.2% applied twice daily for 14 days (for the groin).
The skin biopsy shown in the Figure was received in 10% buffered formalin, measuring 5×4×1 mm of skin. Sections showed an acanthotic epidermis with foci of spongiosis and hypergranulosis covered by mounds of parakeratosis infiltrated by neutrophils. Superficial perivascular and interstitial lymphocytic inflammation was present. Tortuous blood vessels within the papillary dermis also were present. Results showed psoriasiform dermatitis with mild spongiosis. Periodic acid–Schiff stain did not reveal any fungal organisms. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of guttate psoriasis.
The patient then returned 1 month later mentioning continued flare-ups of the scalp as well as newer patches on the arms and hands that were less eruptive and faded more quickly. The plaques in the groin area had resolved. Physical examination showed fewer pink papules and plaques with silvery scaling on the abdomen, bilateral upper extremities and ears, and scalp. Topical medications were continued, and possible apremilast therapy for the psoriasis was discussed.
Comment
Enterovirus-derived HFMD likely is caused by coxsackie-virus A. Current evidence supports the theory that guttate psoriasis can be environmentally triggered in genetically susceptible individuals, often but not exclusively by a streptococcal infection. The causative agent elicits a T-cell–mediated reaction leading to increased type 1 helper T cells, IFN-γ, and IL-2 cytokine levels. HLA-Cw∗0602–positive patients are considered genetically susceptible and more likely to develop guttate psoriasis following an environmental trigger. Based on the coincidence in timing of both diagnoses, this reported case of guttate psoriasis may have been triggered by a coxsackievirus A infection.
There are 4 variants of psoriasis: plaque, guttate, pustular, and erythroderma (in order of prevalence).2 Guttate psoriasis is characterized by small, 2- to 10-mm, raindroplike lesions on the skin.1 It accounts for approximately 2% of total psoriasis cases and is commonly triggered by group A streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis.3,4
Hand-foot-and-mouth disease (HFMD) is an illness most commonly caused by a coxsackievirus A infection but also can be caused by other enteroviruses.5,6 Coxsackievirus is a serotype of the Enterovirus species within the Picornaviridae family.7 Hand-foot-and-mouth disease is characterized by a brief fever and vesicular rashes on the palms, soles, or buttocks, as well as oropharyngeal ulcers.8 Typically, the rash is benign and short-lived.9 In rare cases, neurologic complications develop. There have been no reported cases of guttate psoriasis following a coxsackievirus A infection.
The involvement of coxsackievirus B in the etiopathogenesis of psoriasis has been previously reported.10 We report the case of guttate psoriasis following presumed coxsackievirus A HFMD.
Case Report
A 56-year-old woman presented with a vesicular rash on the hands, feet, and lips. The patient reported having a sore throat that started around the same time that the rash developed. The severity of the sore throat was rated as moderate. No fever was reported. One day prior, the patient’s primary care physician prescribed a tapered course of prednisone for the rash. The patient reported a medical history of herpes zoster virus, sunburn, and genital herpes. She was taking clonazepam and had a known allergy to penicillin.
Physical examination revealed erythematous vesicular and papular lesions on the extensor surfaces of the hands and feet. Vesicles also were noted on the vermilion border of the lip. Examination of the patient’s mouth showed blisters and shallow ulcerations in the oral cavity. A clinical diagnosis of coxsackievirus A HFMD was made, and the treatment plan included triamcinolone acetonide ointment 0.025% applied twice daily for 2 weeks and oral valacyclovir hydrochloride 1 g taken 3 times daily for 7 days. A topical emollient also was recommended for the lips when necessary. The lesions all resolved within a 2-week period with no sequela.
The patient returned 1 month later, citing newer red abdominal skin lesions. Fever was denied. She reported that both prescribed treatments had not been helping for the newer lesions. She noticed similar lesions on the groin and brought them to the attention of her gynecologist. Physical examination revealed salmon pink papules and plaques with silvery scaling involving the abdomen, bilateral upper extremities and ears, and scalp. The patient was then clinically diagnosed with guttate psoriasis. A shave biopsy of a representative lesion on the abdomen was performed. The treatment plan included betamethasone dipropionate cream 0.05% applied twice daily for 2 weeks, clobetasol propionate solution 0.05% applied twice daily for 14 days (for the scalp), and hydrocortisone valerate cream 0.2% applied twice daily for 14 days (for the groin).
The skin biopsy shown in the Figure was received in 10% buffered formalin, measuring 5×4×1 mm of skin. Sections showed an acanthotic epidermis with foci of spongiosis and hypergranulosis covered by mounds of parakeratosis infiltrated by neutrophils. Superficial perivascular and interstitial lymphocytic inflammation was present. Tortuous blood vessels within the papillary dermis also were present. Results showed psoriasiform dermatitis with mild spongiosis. Periodic acid–Schiff stain did not reveal any fungal organisms. These findings were consistent with a diagnosis of guttate psoriasis.
The patient then returned 1 month later mentioning continued flare-ups of the scalp as well as newer patches on the arms and hands that were less eruptive and faded more quickly. The plaques in the groin area had resolved. Physical examination showed fewer pink papules and plaques with silvery scaling on the abdomen, bilateral upper extremities and ears, and scalp. Topical medications were continued, and possible apremilast therapy for the psoriasis was discussed.
Comment
Enterovirus-derived HFMD likely is caused by coxsackie-virus A. Current evidence supports the theory that guttate psoriasis can be environmentally triggered in genetically susceptible individuals, often but not exclusively by a streptococcal infection. The causative agent elicits a T-cell–mediated reaction leading to increased type 1 helper T cells, IFN-γ, and IL-2 cytokine levels. HLA-Cw∗0602–positive patients are considered genetically susceptible and more likely to develop guttate psoriasis following an environmental trigger. Based on the coincidence in timing of both diagnoses, this reported case of guttate psoriasis may have been triggered by a coxsackievirus A infection.
- Langley RG, Krueger GG, Griffiths CE. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(suppl 2):ii18-ii23.
- Sarac G, Koca TT, Baglan T. A brief summary of clinical types of psoriasis. North Clin Istanb. 2016;1:79-82.
- Prinz JC. Psoriasis vulgaris—a sterile antibacterial skin reaction mediated by cross-reactive T cells? an immunological view of the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:326-332.
- Telfer N, Chalmers RJ, Whale K, et al. The role of streptococcal infection in the initiation of guttate psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:39-42.
- Cabrerizo M, Tarragó D, Muñoz-Almagro C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of enterovirus 71, coxsackievirus A16 and A6 associated with hand, foot and mouth disease in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O150-O156.
- Li Y, Chang Z, Wu P, et al. Emerging enteroviruses causing hand, foot and mouth disease, China, 2010-2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1902-1906.
- Seitsonen J, Shakeel S, Susi P, et al. Structural analysis of coxsackievirus A7 reveals conformational changes associated with uncoating. J Virol. 2012;86:7207-7215.
- Wu Y, Yeo A, Phoon M, et al. The largest outbreak of hand; foot and mouth disease in Singapore in 2008: the role of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A strains. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E1076-E1081.
- Tesini BL. Hand-foot-and-mouth-disease (HFMD). May 2018. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/enteroviruses/hand-foot-and-mouth-disease-hfmd. Accessed September 25, 2019.
- Korzhova TP, Shyrobokov VP, Koliadenko VH, et al. Coxsackie B viral infection in the etiology and clinical pathogenesis of psoriasis [in Ukrainian]. Lik Sprava. 2001:54-58.
- Langley RG, Krueger GG, Griffiths CE. Psoriasis: epidemiology, clinical features, and quality of life. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(suppl 2):ii18-ii23.
- Sarac G, Koca TT, Baglan T. A brief summary of clinical types of psoriasis. North Clin Istanb. 2016;1:79-82.
- Prinz JC. Psoriasis vulgaris—a sterile antibacterial skin reaction mediated by cross-reactive T cells? an immunological view of the pathophysiology of psoriasis. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001;26:326-332.
- Telfer N, Chalmers RJ, Whale K, et al. The role of streptococcal infection in the initiation of guttate psoriasis. Arch Dermatol. 1992;128:39-42.
- Cabrerizo M, Tarragó D, Muñoz-Almagro C, et al. Molecular epidemiology of enterovirus 71, coxsackievirus A16 and A6 associated with hand, foot and mouth disease in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O150-O156.
- Li Y, Chang Z, Wu P, et al. Emerging enteroviruses causing hand, foot and mouth disease, China, 2010-2016. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:1902-1906.
- Seitsonen J, Shakeel S, Susi P, et al. Structural analysis of coxsackievirus A7 reveals conformational changes associated with uncoating. J Virol. 2012;86:7207-7215.
- Wu Y, Yeo A, Phoon M, et al. The largest outbreak of hand; foot and mouth disease in Singapore in 2008: the role of enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A strains. Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14:E1076-E1081.
- Tesini BL. Hand-foot-and-mouth-disease (HFMD). May 2018. https://www.msdmanuals.com/professional/infectious-diseases/enteroviruses/hand-foot-and-mouth-disease-hfmd. Accessed September 25, 2019.
- Korzhova TP, Shyrobokov VP, Koliadenko VH, et al. Coxsackie B viral infection in the etiology and clinical pathogenesis of psoriasis [in Ukrainian]. Lik Sprava. 2001:54-58.
Practice Points
- Inquire about any illnesses preceding derma-tologic diseases.
- There may be additional microbial triggers for dermatologic diseases.
